News
Amazon is testing a feature that can ‘resurrect’ a loved one
The ethics are arguable
The pain of grief stings. Losing someone means losing everything you know about them. You won’t see or hear a departed loved one anymore. Technology, however, has progressed enough to create new ways to preserve human beings. Unfortunately, some of those methods are less than savory for some people. Amazon, for example, is experimenting on a way to “resurrect” a dead relative by mimicking their voice through Alexa.
The experiment is as freaky as the premise sounds. Using only one minute of recorded audio, Alexa can supposedly replicate a person’s voice, as revealed in an experiment during Amazon’s re:MARS conference.
As the presentation clearly indicates, Amazon explicitly advocates for the feature’s applications to deal with grief. The clearest example is using the feature to replicate a kid’s grandma’s voice to read a story.
It’s an odd way to use artificial intelligence. While it can certainly preserve someone, one can argue that it can disrupt the grieving process. Others might argue that it can help. And, even if someone argues for the technology, the conversation can go deeper. For example, would you allow a third-party company to use the voice of a loved one for what is essentially a digital butler?
Going beyond the realm of the dead, the feature can also replicate the voices of alive persons. While it might be easy to get a loved one’s permission to use their voice, what are the ethics of using a celebrity, a politician, or a local crush as a voice without their consent?
Currently, the feature is still experimental. With a lot of questions still up in the air, it might stay that way before (or if) the technology makes its way to the general public.
News
The iPhone 18 might sell out for an unexpected reason
The ongoing shortage might play a part in the phone selling out earlier than expected.
An iPhone selling out is not news. Because of how popular the phones are, it’s within the realm of probability that Apple runs out of stock at some point. According to a new report, this year won’t be any different… but it’s for an entirely different reason.
First reported by analyst Tim Culpan, Apple is reportedly struggling to meet its demand for semiconductors for the iPhone 18 and the foldable iPhone. The ongoing memory shortage is cutting off Apple’s ability to deliver the required supply of smartphones in a timely fashion. The report even claims that TSMC, which helps produce the iPhone, is sitting on a shipment of processors, worth US$ 1 billion, that don’t have memory chips.
Now, Apple is still confident that it can weather the launch. However, if the shortage persists, the iPhone 18 generation will likely sell out much more quickly than expected.
It’s an interesting time for Apple to experience such a shortage. It’s been heavily rumored that the company will launch its very first foldable phone next month, creating a new market for the brand. Apple definitely wants this attempt to succeed after the tepid response to its last new product, the Vision Pro.
SEE ALSO: Did Tim Cook just confirm that iPhone prices are going up?
News
These “smart” glasses just sold out in under a week
DuckDuckGo touts that these glasses have zero AI, zero cameras, and an infinite battery life.
Smart glasses are in a weird place right now. While a chunk of the population views them as cool and innovative, another significant chunk sees them as a privacy nightmare. If you’re in the latter group but want to see what life is like on the former, DuckDuckGo has a new product: a pair of anti-surveillance glasses with no camera or AI, otherwise known as just normal sunglasses.
If it’s not obvious, yes, it’s a troll product. DuckDuckGo is a search engine famously known for pushing privacy as a priority, opposing Google’s penchant for advertising and AI. Now, the search engine is taking on the smart glasses market.
Partnering with Knockaround, DuckDuckGo released the Paso Robles, a pair of sunglasses touted as having zero cameras, an always-offline mode, and a battery life of infinity.
It’s a statement piece. The rims have a logo mark, similar to the Meta’s glasses. The packaging also states that the glasses are “designed to block the sun, not send data to the cloud.”
Now, if you want a pair, they cost only US$ 35, as opposed to Meta’s US$ 299 price tag, but they are already sold out.
Which says quite a bit about today’s sentiment against AI and for privacy. Of course, to be fair, DuckDuckGo’s supply is certainly less than Meta’s stock for their smart glasses. It does, however, prove that the sentiment is there.
As of now, the world is slowly realizing that unimpeded smart glasses aren’t such a good idea, leading to people concerned about their privacy. In fact, some states have already started banning the technology in certain public spaces.
News
Google will force Android users to use Gemini next month
Google Assistant will be retired as well.
What is Google’s voice assistant called? Technically, there are two possible answers: Google Assistant and Gemini. Despite Google’s push for Gemini, the ubiquitous Google Assistant is still a common option for most users. However, the company will soon take that choice away as the voice assistant will retire in favor of Gemini.
First reported by 9to5Google, Google has sent emails to users, declaring that Google Assistant will no longer be an option for Android users starting September 4. On that date, the company will slowly roll out an update to get rid of the assistant’s availability on device.
Google also makes it clear that Gemini will be “the assistant experience on Android” moving forward. If you’re used to Google Assistant to help you with handsfree use, you’ll have only one option soon. This also affects other peripherals including smartwatches and audio accessories.
Of course, there are a few exceptions. Devices that can’t support an AI-powered assistant like Gemini are mercifully spared of the forced transition. Likewise, devices in countries that don’t support the AI assistant are also saved.
Despite the tepid reception of AI today, Google remains adamant about pushing Gemini to more users, regardless of whether they want it or not. In fact, a forced move like this will likely inflate the numbers that more devices are using Google’s AI software than ever before, while conveniently hiding the fact that most users never really had much of a choice.
SEE ALSO: Apple gives up on making AI, inks a deal with Gemini to power Siri
-
Automotive4 days agoVinFast debuts two-wheeler models, opens 21 e-motorcycle showrooms
-
Computers1 week agoAMD launches Radeon RX 9050 graphics card
-
Computers2 weeks agoAORUS MASTER 16 Gen 2 2026 AI gaming laptop launches
-
Gaming2 weeks agoGod of War Laufey finally confirms its highly anticipated launch date
-
Automotive7 days agoXiaomi debuts SkyNomad Series featuring new Kunlun platform
-
News3 days agoOnePlus officially leaves the United States and Canada
-
Gaming1 week agoNBA 2K27 gameplay trailer showcases new dunk mechanics, Rucker Park, and more
-
Gaming6 days agoCall of Duty: Modern Warfare 4 clip shows Losing Ground 1st look
