Features

Why you should care about the Apple-FBI legal fight

Published

on

By now, you’ve probably heard of the San Bernardino shooting. If you haven’t, then let me refresh your memory. On December 2, 2015, 14 people were killed and 22 were seriously injured in an apparent terrorist attack at the Inland Regional Center in San Bernardino, California.

It’s one of the more prominent acts of terrorism that have hit the U.S. because of one important evidence: the Apple iPhone 5c used by one of the shooters that was found on the scene. It may or may not contain information, but the significance of that piece of technology is not about what it holds but what it represents.

Setting a bad precedent

A few weeks ago, the Federal Bureau of Investigation announced that they couldn’t unlock the iPhone 5c through sheer brute force, i.e., constantly guessing the 4-digit passcode until they get it right. The agency said they couldn’t risk wiping the data with more tries, a security feature built into the device by Apple.

And because the data on the 5c wasn’t synced with iCloud, the FBI had to find alternative methods of accessing it. Their idea — a radical one — was to ask Apple to create a special tool that:

  • allows the FBI to guess as many passwords as they like without the data on the phone being wiped; and
  • lets the iPhone connect to an external device, such as a desktop or laptop, where the FBI can run a script that guesses passwords quickly.

With the advancement of technology, it was only a matter of time before information security became a national security issue. The problem here is that Apple no longer has the ability to access encrypted data on iDevices running iOS 8 or higher.

Even if they could, Apple firmly believes they shouldn’t, as explicitly stated on their website via an open letter penned by CEO Tim Cook:

In today’s digital world, the ‘key’ to an encrypted system is a piece of information that unlocks the data, and it is only as secure as the protections around it. Once the information is known, or a way to bypass the code is revealed, the encryption can be defeated by anyone with that knowledge.

The government suggests this tool could only be used once, on one phone. But that’s simply not true. Once created, the technique could be used over and over again, on any number of devices. In the physical world, it would be the equivalent of a master key, capable of opening hundreds of millions of locks — from restaurants and banks to stores and homes. No reasonable person would find that acceptable.

The government is asking Apple to hack our own users and undermine decades of security advancements that protect our customers — including tens of millions of American citizens — from sophisticated hackers and cybercriminals. The same engineers who built strong encryption into the iPhone to protect our users would, ironically, be ordered to weaken those protections and make our users less safe.

The FBI invoked the All Writs Act of 1789 — a century-old U.S. federal statute that has been used to practically force technology companies to cooperate with the government — to get a court order.

Personal data in the wrong hands

Our phones hold an unbelievable amount of information. They have become windows to our lives. Our location, our messages, our pictures, bank records, statements, emails, and everything else in between? Chances are, all of them can be found on our phones.

In the wrong hands, that data could destroy our lives. Which is why the biggest smartphone OS developers — namely Google, Apple, and Microsoft — have made data security a big, if not the biggest, part of their respective feature lists.

With the FBI asking Apple to create a special system to bypass the tech company’s security setup, that system will be out there. That’s partly why Apple is afraid; even if they could create one, it would undermine everything they worked hard for. Once the system is created, nothing is stopping the FBI — or anybody who gets their hands on the software — to use it for personal or criminal reasons.

The FBI suggested solutions to the problem:

  • there will be a custom ID, i.e., each custom OS can only be installed on a specific phone;
  • operation of the software will be done only at Apple’s HQ in Cupertino, California; and
  • any software update needs Apple’s approval to install.

But most security experts agree this isn’t just going to be about one phone. From the Verge:

That’s a nervous-making thought for security professionals, since no single system is ever thought to be entirely impenetrable. New vulnerabilities pop up in software all the time, and for the iPhone, they can sell for as much as $1 million. iPhone security expert Jonathan Zdziarski says there’s a real concern that an undisclosed vulnerability or existing exploit could be used in a way that Apple and the FBI can’t predict. Even if the signature system isn’t broken outright, the same tricks used by the FBI’s tool could be repurposed to give malware a stronger foothold on a targeted iPhone. ‘It’s not about just stealing one tool,’ says Zdziarski. ‘There’s a lot going on in software like this, and having a direct tap into how Apple can disable functions moves [attackers] along at light speed.’

But more than the system going into the wrong hands, it’s about that system ever existing in the first place. Because once the FBI wins the legal battle, it will set a terrible precedent for all tech companies. It tells them that the government, in their infinite benevolence, will be able to ask for the court order again and again. Once that’s possible, no matter what the FBI, the Central Intelligence Agency, or the National Security Agency says, they’ll have the power to lord over everyone’s privacy just because they’re the government.

And remember Edward Snowden, the former CIA contractor who leaked evidence of the U.S. government practically spying on everybody? Yeah.

That’s why you should care. If the court order holds and Apple can’t fight it back legally, then say goodbye to actual privacy, at least whatever is left of it anyway.

Whether you’re here in the Philippines or not, your privacy will be compromised. Whether it’s the government or some crooks who are spying on you, it won’t matter. Unless you stop using smartphones or any other devices that connect to the Internet, your privacy and your personal life will not be your own.

So pray that Apple wins this injunction and hope that you still hold control over your life after all of this is said and done. Because if they don’t, hackers will be the least of your worries.

[irp posts=”4932″ name=”Unhappy customer walks into Apple Store, destroys Apple products”]

Features

Spotlight: HUAWEI WATCH GT Runner 2 Racing Legend Edition

A marathon coaching system wrapped in the lightest titanium running smartwatch.

Published

on

 

@gadgetmatchEliud Kipchoge, the world’s greatest marathon runner, helped design this watch. The HUAWEI WATCH GT Runner 2 Racing Legend Edition is the lightest titanium smartwatch built for runners, featuring the most accurate GPS in its class. It packs an AI-powered marathon coaching system alongside comprehensive health and fitness tracking built right into your wrist. #HUAWEIWATCHGTRunner2RacingLegendEdition HUAWEI Online Store – https://tinyurl.com/479ee4zk Shopee – https://tinyurl.com/yex4dvp9 Lazada – https://tinyurl.com/yu47bktt TikTok – https://tinyurl.com/yxsjsyhw♬ original sound – GadgetMatch


Eliud Kipchoge ran a marathon in under two hours. That’s not a marketing line. It’s one of the most significant feats in the history of human endurance.

So when Huawei says the HUAWEI WATCH GT Runner 2 Racing Legend Edition was designed with his input, that detail deserves more than a passing mention. It shapes what this watch actually is, and more importantly, what it’s trying to do.

The GT Runner 2 isn’t a smartwatch that happens to track runs. It’s a running tool built from the ground up, wrapped in titanium, and finished in a colorway that carries Kipchoge’s energy in its gradient and clean lines.

Lightest titanium watch

The first thing you notice when you put the GT Runner 2 on is how little you notice it.

At 43.5 grams for the watch body, it’s Huawei’s lightest metal running watch to date. For reference, that’s roughly the weight of a small packet of sugar.

On paper that sounds like a marketing metric. On a long run, it’s the kind of thing you actually feel — or more accurately, the kind of thing you stop feeling, which is the point.

The case is aerospace-grade titanium alloy, the same material used in aircraft construction. It’s strong without adding bulk, and at 10.7mm thick, it slides under a long sleeve without a second thought.

The display is a 1.43-inch AMOLED panel with 3,000 nits of peak brightness, enough to read clearly under direct sunlight mid-run, which is where it needs to perform.

The Racing Legend Edition colorway is the visual anchor of the whole package. It doesn’t read as a sports watch in the traditional chunky sense.

The strap situation is thoughtful, too. The in-box AirDry woven strap is designed to breathe.

There’s also a Fluororubber quick-release strap included for race days when you want something more locked in against your wrist.

Accurate GPS

This is the centerpiece of the GT Runner 2, and Huawei has invested the most engineering effort here.

To understand why the GPS on this watch is different, you need to understand a basic problem with how most GPS watches work.

Satellites broadcast signals in a circular, spiral pattern. Most smartwatches are built to receive signals linearly, meaning they’re only catching part of what’s being sent. The result is data loss, and data loss means inaccurate tracking.

The GT Runner 2 addresses this at the hardware level with what Huawei calls a 3D Floating Antenna Architecture. The titanium bezel and metal middle frame of the watch itself function as external receivers, which expands the antenna surface area significantly.

More of the watch is actively listening for satellite signals, which means it captures more of those spiral broadcasts. Huawei positions this as a 50% improvement in antenna performance.

Then there’s the software layer, which is arguably more interesting for anyone running in an urban environment.

Anyone who’s tracked a city run knows the problem: you go under an overpass, cut through a tunnel, or run between towers, and your GPS trace goes straight. The watch gives up and draws a line where your route should be.

The GT Runner 2 has an AI system — Huawei calls it the XDR Inertial Navigation AI Algorithm — that fills that gap intelligently.

It learns your movement patterns: your stride length, your arm swing, your pace. When satellite signal drops out, it uses that accumulated knowledge to estimate your route accurately. When the signal returns, it stitches the two together seamlessly.

Marathon mode

The Marathon Mode on the GT Runner 2 was co-developed with Eliud Kipchoge’s team. That partnership matters because it means the feature set was shaped by people who actually race at the highest level, not just engineers working from data.

The system covers the full race cycle. Before your event, the watch builds you a personalized training plan and tracks your lactate threshold in real time, the point at which your body starts accumulating fatigue faster than it can clear it.

Knowing where that threshold sits is how serious runners train in the right zones and avoid hitting the wall during a race. The GT Runner 2 brings that metric to your wrist without requiring a lab visit or a coach.

During a race, the pace guidance isn’t a static target you set and follow. It adjusts in real time based on how you’re actually performing. The watch also sends smart refueling alerts — not based on a generic timer, but on your personal health data and international nutrition guidelines. So when it tells you to eat or drink, it’s working from your numbers, not a one-size-fits-all schedule.

After the race, it gives you dynamic recovery guidance and exports your full session automatically to Strava and Komoot.

Health tracking that actually goes beyond the basics

The GT Runner 2 tracks your health around the clock, and a few of its features stand apart from what most smartwatches offer.

Heart rate accuracy is rated at 98%. For a wrist-worn device, that’s a serious number. The watch achieves this through Huawei’s TruSense system, which uses an upgraded NPU and advanced algorithms to pull more precise readings from the sensor.

The ECG monitoring is CE-certified, which means it meets the regulatory standard for detecting early signs of irregular heart rhythms.

More importantly, the GT Runner 2 does this in the background — passively, while you’re awake or asleep — without requiring you to manually activate a check.

Sleep tracking includes breathing awareness to flag potential signs of sleep apnea.

HRV — heart rate variability, one of the most reliable indicators of how recovered your body actually is — gets tracked across 24 hours.

There’s also a stress and emotional wellbeing tracker that categorizes your state in real time. When you’re deep in a training block and everything feels harder than it should, this is the kind of data that tells you something concrete rather than just confirming that you’re tired.

Battery life that doesn’t ask you to compromise

Running watches live or die by their battery, and the GT Runner 2 doesn’t disappoint here.

Continuous GPS tracking lasts 32 hours. To put that in running terms, that’s enough to cover five to six full marathons without stopping to charge. Enable Trail Run mode and that extends to 35 hours. Under normal daily use, you’re looking at up to 14 days on a single charge. When it does need power, it charges wirelessly.

Storage comes in at 64GB, which holds thousands of offline songs and heavy map data simultaneously. You can leave your phone behind on a long run and still have music and navigation on your wrist. It works with both Android and iOS, and syncs automatically to Strava and Komoot after every session.

For users in the Philippines, there’s one more practical addition worth calling out: GCash Watch Pay. You can pay at any GCash QR terminal directly from your wrist. For anyone who stops mid-run to refuel, this removes the friction of digging through a bag or pocket to complete a transaction.

Is the HUAWEI WATCH GT Runner 2 Racing Legend Edition your GadgetMatch?

The HUAWEI WATCH GT Runner 2 Racing Legend Edition was built around one clear premise: give runners access to the kind of data and guidance that previously lived inside expensive coaching programs and professional setups, and put it on a wrist that doesn’t feel like it’s carrying anything.

The titanium build, the GPS architecture, the Marathon Mode co-developed with the world’s greatest marathon runner — none of these are incidental features. They’re the point. And the way the watch surfaces all of that information keeps it accessible.

Every purchase comes with a complimentary three-month HUAWEI Health+ membership, which unlocks professional coaching videos, custom sleep music, and personalized nutrition and training plans.

The HUAWEI WATCH GT Runner 2 is available at HUAWEI Experience Stores nationwide, the HUAWEI Online Store, and Huawei’s official stores on Shopee, Lazada, and TikTok Shop.

Purchases made from June 30 onwards come with an exclusive bundle worth up to PhP 11,384 — including a free fluoroelastomer strap, a free pair of HUAWEI FreeArc earphones (on a first-come, first-served basis), the three-month Health+ membership, and a two-year warranty with accidental damage protection.

There’s also a PhP 2,000 trade-in token for buyers coming from an older device.


This feature is a collaboration between GadgetMatch and Huawei Philippines.

Continue Reading

Explainers

Everyone’s angry at PlayStation’s new no-disc policy, and this is why

It’s a tragedy for nostalgia, ownership, and preservation.

Published

on

Check in with your gamer friends today. Today, a lot of gamers are up in arms over Sony’s decision to kill the physical game disc starting in 2028. But, if you’re a digital-only gamer or just not a gamer yourself, you might not understand the anger. If you want to understand the ire or just want to relate with your gamer friends, here’s a primer for you.

Ending the era of the physical media

Last year, Nintendo launched the Switch 2. Though the console still has a slot for physical cartridges, the Switch 2 also introduced the Virtual Game Card as a way to digitize your library of games.

Of course, the feature wasn’t positioned as a way to eliminate physical cartridges. In fact, Nintendo just wanted to add the flexibility of physical cartridges to the digital world. In the end, the feature strangely coincided with less cartridges. For example, Pokémon Pokopia, one of the most popular games this year, does not come with a cartridge even if you buy a “physical” copy in a brick-and-mortar store. It was a portent of things to come.

Fast forward to today, Sony has made the monumental decision to stop producing physical game discs starting in 2028. The PlayStation’s future is completely digital.

On a similar note, Microsoft is also experimenting with a disc-to-digital feature. Much like the Nintendo Virtual Game Card, the experiment will digitize libraries and attaches the digital copy to the physical game disc. It sounds awfully like a prelude to killing off the game disc.

Why this matters

The physical disc is synonymous with a simpler time. It represents a time when gamers camped out stores to anticipate midnight releases, when gamers can learn more about their games through an in-box manual, and when gamers can show off their fandom through a beautifully stocked shelf of games.

And yes, that’s part of why this situation sucks, but it’s not the only reason.

If you’re an outsider looking in, this nostalgia factor is the easiest to see. Then again, it’s also the most difficult to relate with, especially if you’ve never had the history of buying physical games.

The more crucial reason — and the one that most people will relate with — is media ownership. By not having a physical copy, you will no longer have ownership of what you bought digitally.

And it’s not an imaginary issue. In 2024, Steam amended its policies to reflect that players do not own the games they buy. Rather, they simply own a license to play the game.

In the same year, Ubisoft delisted The Crew, a sure sign that the new policy means business. Though Steam itself has a relatively good track record of prioritizing its customers, publishers and developers can get rid of games if they choose to.

That limitation doesn’t exist with a physical copy. As long as you have a working disc drive, you can install a game whenever you want, even if the publisher decides to pull it from stores.

Therein lies how much this is a touchy topic. Should you own digital goods in the same way as you own physical ones? If the answer is yes, then selling only the license for the good doesn’t make sense. But if it’s a no, we shouldn’t pay full price for something we don’t own anyway.

Will PlayStation actually delete games?

Now, just because they can, does it mean that they will?

Right now, it’s hard to say. You can certainly go by the optimistic hope that PlayStation would never do something as anti-consumer as that. And yes, there are times when you’d be right.

Plus, there is a good chance that governments, especially those in the European Union, will protect consumers if PlayStation even thinks about deleting a game that others have paid for. Governments have been known to intervene in the past, such as when the EU forced Apple to adopt USB-C as a standard. There are checks and balances available.

Then again, Sony has had recent history of deleting media from a user’s library.

Only a few days ago, PlayStation made headlines for deleting over 500 titles from their library. Starting September 1, users can no longer access movies distributed by Studio Canal, due to licensing agreements. Sony was unapologetic about unceremoniously deleting this content. No refunds, no apologies; just 500 movies, which you thought you bought, gone for good.

No matter how you angle it, Sony’s recent decisions just don’t bode well for media ownership.

You can argue that this is the price we’re paying for not buying enough physical games. Still, losing PlayStation discs, even as an option, is tragic for nostalgia, ownership, and preservation.

The world we live in

Unfortunately, this all comes with precedent. Unless you buy physical games and movies, we already don’t own anything in today’s world.

Outside games, Netflix and Disney+ remove the ownership of movies and shows from us. It’s already common practice for these platforms to remove titles regularly. Some platforms even give you a last chance to catch these titles before they go away. Moreover, they can even restrict access, like with Disney+, if you travel abroad.

In exchange for convenience, subscription services and digital storefronts have made it all too comfortable to not own media. With a rental service like Netflix, that’s all expected, but we’re now at the inevitable stage when even bought games and movies are at the behest of our corporate overlords.

This is where the fury comes from. Companies are getting more brazen about taking more options from us. Between this and the increasing prices of RAM, it’s getting harder and harder to live as a tech-savvy citizen in today’s age.

Continue Reading

Features

Why I stopped chasing grid-worthy and started eating peso-worthy food

Grab’s 5-Star Eats saved me, and I’ve been ordering smarter ever since

Published

on

La Union has always held a complicated kind of real estate in my chest. I wrote about it early, before the bagnet boom and before I’m Drunk, I Love You made it a pilgrimage site for broken hearts.

The piece went viral and tourism spiked. I’ve quietly felt a little responsible for that ever since.

Three years ago, I went back to reconcile with someone who had broken mine. We rebuilt things the only way I know how: through food and sunsets, slowly and without any real plan.

It didn’t work out. He was gone two years later. And this year, I drove up again with my friends who’ve seen all fourteen years of me, specifically to replace those memories with better ones.

What I didn’t expect was to need saving from the food. The coffee I used to swear by tasted like warm brown water. A restaurant I’d always loved wouldn’t extend basic hospitality on a quiet, off-peak afternoon.

One of our watermelon shakes had a fly in it, and we genuinely spent a minute debating whether it was tapioca. Even my go-to dish from the place I’d been hyping for years landed completely flat, and I ate it quietly thinking I could cook better than this at home.

It stings when a place you loved starts coasting on its own legend.

When the ratings know better

Halfway through the trip, I gave up on memory and opened Grab. I let the star ratings decide where we’d eat, because I was tired of being let down by places I’d been vouching for.

That’s how we found Grab’s 5-Star Eats, a curated list that runs on real diner reviews, not sponsored placement or algorithm luck. To make the list, a restaurant has to prove itself at volume — a handful of glowing testimonials won’t move the needle.

Service gets weighted too: prep time, order accuracy, whether what arrived actually matched what was ordered. And food quality is measured the most practical way possible, where what the photo promises, the plate has to deliver.

We dined in at one place and ordered delivery to our stay from another. None of them were photogenic, and they certainly weren’t the posh spots making rounds on TikTok and Instagram.

They looked like roadside canteens and family-run eateries, the kind you’d drive past on the way to the beach without a second glance. Every single one was excellent.

After the trip, I reached out to a former mentor who, like me, had spent enough summers in La Union to feel like it belonged to us a little. He said the best restaurants there have always been away from the beach and the hype, and away from the content.

The list I didn’t know I was already following

When I got home to Kapitolyo, I had a quiet revelation that I probably should’ve had a lot sooner. The neighborhood is a well-known food hub, and I’ve been ordering and dining out here on instinct.

When I pulled up the 5-Star Eats list after La Union, I realized that many of the places I already rotate through were already on it. I’d been eating well by accident, and the list had been validating my choices the whole time.

BAC’s Sisig Express, where I get my silog fix on mornings I can’t be bothered to cook, turns out to be one of the top-ranked spots on the local list.

I found that out during the busiest week I’ve had this year, when a sudden shift at work sent everything sideways and I ordered the sisig, the Shanghai rolls, and the tocilog to get through the day. It delivered, as it always does.

And Lao Tai Pei in Kapitolyo, my go-to for dinner dates with the people I actually want to spend time with, the place I’ve been half-gatekeeping because it feels too good to share — it’s on the list too. Ranked exactly where it deserves to be.

I wasn’t surprised. I was glad that more people would finally find their way there through something more reliable than a viral reel.

Peso-worthy over grid-worthy, every time

Here’s what I’ve come to understand about food content: it’s beautiful, and it’s largely useless.

Social media gave small restaurants a real shot at finding an audience, and that part is genuinely good. Somewhere along the way, though, people confused visibility for quality.

Now, every café has a grid, a vibe, and a color palette. You can’t actually tell what’s worth your money until you’re already sitting there, 300 pesos poorer, eating something that looks stunning in natural light and tastes like nothing.

I spent years chasing the aesthetic: the plating and the whole production of a well-styled meal. I still eat with my eyes, but I’ve gotten older, and I’ve learned that the experience has to match what I paid for. That’s not a small thing to ask for.

What I appreciate most about Grab’s 5-Star Eats is that it doesn’t trade in aesthetics. It trades in accountability.

The ratings reflect what diners actually experienced, from the accuracy of the order to the quality of what landed on the table, and the list only holds restaurants that can sustain that standard over time.

Grid-worthy is easy to manufacture. Peso-worthy has to be earned.

Continue Reading

Trending