News

Apple beats Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 in benchmark tests

Before Qualcomm can even put a smartphone out

Published

on

When a new processor comes out, the common strategy is to hype the chipset as the next leader of the market. However, hype can only speak so much for performance. As the foil to Apple’s A16 Bionic, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, finally makes its debut, benchmark tests have chomped at the bit for an opportunity to pit one against the other.

Unfortunately, though both have touted leading performance against the other, one is clearly victorious in preliminary benchmark tests. Of course, a smartphone with the new Qualcomm chipset hasn’t come out yet. However, an unannounced device recently made its way to Geekbench (via MacRumors and DealNTech).

According to the test, the Qualcomm chipset scored 1483 using one core and 4709 in multi-core tests. In contrast, the A16 Bionic scored 1874 in the single-core test and 5372 in the multi-core one. Further, the previous A15 Bionic topped the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 with 1709 in the single-core test.

On paper, Apple’s latest chipset beats the latest from Qualcomm. However, benchmark tests are only one side of the equation. It still depends on how a smartphone uses the chipset in real life conditions, especially since a good chunk of users don’t buy smartphones depending on benchmark scores.

Still, if you’re invested in the clash of benchmark scores, Apple just put a feather in its cap before Qualcomm could even out their chipset in a smartphone.

SEE ALSO: Qualcomm launches the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2

News

A new iMessage feature alerts you of any government spies

Anyone can use it

Published

on

Do you have an irrational fear of government hackers spying on your text messages? If you do, Apple has a new feature to help alleviate your phobia. Starting today, users can opt into the new iMessage Contact Key Verification feature, a security measure designed to prevent any unwanted snooping on your messages.

If it sounds too specific, it’s because Apple designed the feature for those who face “extraordinary digital threats,” like journalists and politicians. Naturally, this subset of the population can benefit from keeping their conversations away from snoopers (which includes, according to Apple, state-sponsored attackers). However, there’s no denying that the feature is also a boon to users who want an extra layer of protection for their messaging needs.

To use the feature, both the sender and the receiver need to have the option turned on while using their device. On a more basic level, the device will alert both users if an unexpected party suddenly crashes and enters the encrypted conversation. A more advanced level even allows iMessage users to compare verification codes, ensuring that both parties are indeed talking to whomever they intend to talk to.

While most users might not find a lot of use for an exorbitant amount of protection against hackers, it’s a step in the right direction for total message encryption. Despite some significant hiccups, Apple remains focused on bringing encryption to its users.

SEE ALSO: Apple is tracking users even with settings turned off

Continue Reading

Gaming

Microsoft is being prevented from buying Activision Blizzard

Sued by the FTC

Published

on

The year started off with a bang. Microsoft, already a respectable name in the gaming industry by itself, announced the impending acquisition of Activision Blizzard for US$ 68.7 billion. Perhaps it’s fitting that the year will end right back where it started. The FTC is officially suing Microsoft to block the monumental purchase from going through.

Announced today, the United States’ FTC (or Federal Trade Commission) has filed a legal claim against Microsoft, stating that the acquisition will allow the company to suppress competition between its rivals in the gaming industry. The commission believes that it has enough to effectively block the purchase. Allowing Microsoft to go through with the purchase will supposedly enable the company to prevent Activision Blizzard’s titles — including the Call of Duty franchise — from coming out easily on other platforms.

Since the announcement of the acquisition, Activision Blizzard has gone through a rocky year. The company had its dirty laundry aired out: a plethora of disagreeable practices from within the company. Exacerbated by the rocky launches of Diablo Immortal and Overwatch 2, it’s not exactly a stellar year for the company.

In fact, it’s not a good year for monopolistic practices either. Recently, Ticketmaster found itself under the microscope after a massive kerfuffle preventing Taylor Swift fans from purchasing tickets to the star’s upcoming concert.

While the deal between Microsoft and Activision Blizzard is still up in the air, it seems company acquisitions aren’t as easy as this year has made them out to be.

SEE ALSO: Microsoft announces a modular Adaptive Mouse

Continue Reading

Apps

Google is merging Waze with Google Maps

Apps will remain separate

Published

on

It’s not a secret. Google owns both Google Maps and Waze. Though both certainly come with their own pros and cons, using either app can boil down to a matter of preference, especially in driving cities. Starting soon, the two might even look more alike. Google is merging the teams of Google Maps and Waze together.

Since acquiring Waze in 2013, Google has kept the app’s development separate from Google Maps. Even knowing this face, it’s hard to draw comparisons between the two. They felt like separate products, and they were.

Now, as announced today (via Wall Street Journal), Google will merge Waze’s team (which consists of over 500 employees) with the larger team that oversees Maps, Earth, and Street View. While there are no plans to lay off any employees, incumbent Waze CEO Neha Parikh is expected to leave the company after the merger.

Though a merger might spell the end for Waze, Google remains committed to keeping its own services separate from each other. However, by merging the teams, the company can reduce a lot of redundant work that the two teams have in common.

From a more generalized standpoint, Google Maps and Waze are incredibly distinct apps. While the latter focuses more of directions for drivers, Google Maps offers a grander sweep of directions for all travelers including those who prefer to walk or take public transportation.

SEE ALSO: Google Maps introduces a new way to be a tourist

Continue Reading

Trending