News

Xiaomi’s 200W fast charging tech severely degrades battery capacity

But there’s nothing to worry about

Published

June 14, 2021

Shivam Vahia

Recently, Xiaomi showed off its new fast-charging solution that leverages a whopping 200W of power. While the battery is charged within no time, the ultra-fast solution severely degrades battery capacity within a short period of time.

The Chinese phone maker did a Q&A on Weibo, China’s leading social media site, and revealed that the technology has adverse side effects on the phone’s battery. The battery loses 20 percent of its capacity within 800 cycles, enough to last an average user two years.

In simpler terms, it means that a Mi 11 Ultra with a 5000mAh battery will only retain 4000mAh after two years of usage. The Chinese regulatory authority requires at least 60 percent of capacity retention with 400 cycles, making it acceptable for the market.

In defense, Xiaomi says that its 200W solution only depletes a battery as much as any regular 5W charger would do over the course of two years. And that’s correct. Whether you charge your phone via 5W for four hours or 200W for 15 minutes, the heat generated in the process is bound to have long-term effects on the battery itself.

What are charging cycles?

Most smartphone batteries have an average life of 1000 cycles, which is more than sufficient to last you more than two years. The ability of lithium-ion batteries to store charge depends on the extent of their degradation, and each recharge technically degrades it.

One cycle count is completed only when the phone completely depletes 100 percent of the battery. So, even if you charge the phone mid-way through the battery drain, a cycle will only be completed when it depletes its charge completely.

The aging process continues at the same rate as before so that a cell whose capacity had fallen to 80 percent after 1000 cycles will probably continue working to perhaps 2000 cycles when its effective capacity will have fallen to 60 percent of its original capacity.

Enterprise

Google illegally destroys 250,000 trees for a single AI data center

This is what we stand to lose with data centers.

Published

October 22, 2026

Luigi Leonardo

In the Philippines, it’s illegal to cut down a single tree without a permit. It’s a constant reminder that the preservation of nature should be a civil, besides being a moral, obligation. And yet, corporations are seemingly immune from obligations and morals. Google, the company that used to stand for “Don’t be evil,” shows off its true colors by illegally cutting down 250,000 trees in Finland for a datacenter.

As first reported by The Guardian, Finland is now staring at 330 hectares of land suddenly denuded of around 250,000 valuable trees, all thanks to Google. A local ecologist has also said that the company killed a further 150,000 trees at a separate site.

The environmental desecration is part of Google’s multibillion-dollar push to build data centers all over the world for artificial intelligence. Google has since been ordered to stop the development in the country after Finland found that the company acted without securing the needed assessments and permits to clear the area.

Google brushed away the report by saying that they acted “on the best understanding we had of the legislation at the time.” The company also said that they are protecting the water quality at the affected sites and committed to replanting trees across 130 hectares, a pale comparison to the total area affected.

Other AI companies are also trying to weasel their way into other countries to build data centers. An example is the controversial Pax Silica in the Philippines. Finland now stands as a cautionary tale against the unimpeded and unsupervised growth of data centers for a service that no one asked for.

Don’t be evil, my ass.

Accessories

Bose acquires Skullcandy

But both are still separate brands.

Published

October 22, 2026

Luigi Leonardo

As one of the wisest sages of the 2000s once said, “He was a punk, she did ballet. What more can I say?” Sometimes, opposites attract. Now, two of those opposites in the audio space are coming together: the punk Skullcandy and the ballet-loving Bose.

Today, Bose has announced its acquisition of Skullcandy. The latter will continue to operate as a separate brand but now officially under the Bose umbrella. Although, it’s not a new collaboration as the two brands have previously worked together on devices before. Skullcandy will just have more access to Bose’s technologies moving forward.

Alternatively, Bose will now have access to Skullcandy’s more varied audience. Compared to Bose’s focus on premium products, Skullcandy caters to more alternative lifestyles. Though the brand has since mellowed from its more radical roots, it is still known as one of the alternative brands.

Bose, on the other hand, is still a household name for home audio and noise-cancelling headphones. The new relationship between two polar opposites might be seen as a weird one, but it’s ultimately beneficial to both parties. Besides, both brands were very strong in the 2010s. Keeping both brands going is a boon to audiophiles of the past decade.

Gaming

Next Xbox might cost double the price of an Xbox today

The most expensive Xbox Series X costs $900. The next Xbox’s price might double that.

Published

October 22, 2026

Luigi Leonardo

Buying a new gaming setup must be one of the most torturous things you can purchase these days. The rising price of chips has hampered the buying ability of many a consumer today. Sadly, that trend isn’t changing anytime soon. According to new reports, the next Xbox might cost double of what an Xbox costs these days.

The next console is currently codenamed Project Helix. Spearheaded by relatively new Xbox CEO Asha Sherma, Project Helix has hopes of being an all-around gaming machine capable of playing PC games besides console exclusives. Sharma obviously wants the platform to come back as a worthy destination for gamers.

That’s a monumental task, though, especially after the rising prices of chips are constantly threatening the prices of new devices. Now, according to a profile of Sharma published by Fortune, the next Xbox might cost as high as US$ 1,800. For reference, the limited 25^th anniversary edition of the Xbox Series X currently costs US$ 899.

Should Fortune’s estimate hold true, a new console in the coming years is double the cost of the most expensive Xbox Series X variant available today. The next generation of gaming might be even more of a luxury than it already is.

Unfortunately, things aren’t getting better across the board. Gaming on PC and on PlayStation aren’t going to be much cheaper as the RAM crisis continues.