Entertainment
Now Playing: F1 the Movie
A great entry point for audiences to get into F1
Years ago, Netflix’s Drive to Survive introduced the world of Formula 1 to a wider audience, owing to the electrifying personalities of a few inside the league such as Daniel Ricciardo and Guenther Steiner. Now, the docuseries effect has significantly waned. It hasn’t helped that both Ricciardo and Steiner both left the league already. So, if a new piece of F1 media — say, a movie — were to come out, it needs two things: a charismatic hero and the ability to entice general audiences.
The new F1 the Movie has a tall task ahead of its premiere. How can it market the best of Formula 1 in a dramatized, fictional format?
What’s it about?
F1 the Movie stars Brad Pitt as an aging racer named Sonny Hayes. After a freak accident cuts his career in Formula 1 to an abrupt halt, Hayes chases after the thrill of racing by driving in other forms such as the Daytona and the Baja. However, thirty years after the accident, his former teammate and now-owner of an F1 team Ruben Cervantes (Javier Bardem) asks Hayes to come back to F1 and save Expensify APX GP by winning a race in a terrible car.
The quest for the team’s (and Haye’s) first win faces opposition when rookie teammate Joshua Pearce (Damson Idris) butts heads with Hayes in a bid to keep his seat for the next season. When the team’s technical director Kate McKenna (Kerry Condon) initially refuses to design a better car for Hayes, the team faces a potential implosion before its investors can even pull the plug themselves.
Mixing F1 with drama and thrills
The rivalry between an older veteran and a talented rookie should feel familiar to those who’ve watched blockbuster sports movies before. Though the plot doesn’t reinvent the wheel, it makes for great viewing especially in the context of Formula 1. Yes, some of the plot’s beats are certainly predictable. Obviously, Hayes’s old ways clash perilously with Pearce’s modern approach. Obviously, one will see the benefit of the other’s methods, and vice versa.
You can see the twists coming from a kilometer away, but that hardly matters. It’s a fun popcorn movie that showcases the sport in a way that it hasn’t been before. Races feel much more intense and personal with cameras following drivers into the cockpit and turning smoothly to show cars behind. The best part is that it’s done without inducing vertigo. Every bit of action is easy to follow despite how fast the cars are going.
The Formula 1 production team should take pointers from this movie. I’d love to watch races in the movie’s cinematic style.
With that in mind, F1 the Movie fulfills its purpose of presenting the sport in an accessible but engaging way for those unfamiliar with motorsports. If you don’t know much about Formula 1, this movie is a good gateway drug.
Creativity in exchange for authenticity
However, emphasizing drama will always risk authenticity. As a Formula 1 fan myself, I can see bits and pieces where the film’s writers took massive creative liberties to heighten the drama.
For example, Hayes’s racecraft can be described as remarkably unorthodox. In one race, he intentionally rams into other drivers to give his team an advantage. The film portrays this strategy as a crafty one, and it does lead to success.
However, in reality, this craftiness just can’t fly. In modern Formula 1, hitting another driver, intentionally or accidentally, often leads to penalties or outright disqualification. Multiple crashes in a single race is just an impossibility. Never mind that it can bankrupt a struggling team even further, or that Pitt’s lack of gargantuan neck muscles will probably lead to severe injuries.
Despite the creativity, the film does have its basis in reality. It’s not all technobabble or a magical “Jesus, take the wheel” approach. When the team talks about car design, they refer correctly to aerodynamics and downforce. When Hayes talks strategy before a race, he accurately calls out tire compounds. The film makes an effort to ground its more creative decisions in some reality, owing perhaps to Sir Lewis Hamilton’s involvement as an executive producer.
How can you enjoy F1 the Movie as an F1 fan?
F1 the Movie is a tough film to place. Though the film is excellent for those unfamiliar with the world of Formula 1, the enjoyment of motorsports fans will likely depend on their expectations going into the cinema.
If you go into F1 the Movie expecting a grounded thriller like Rush or Ford v Ferrari, then you’re going to leave disappointed. Heck, Drive to Survive fans might not be happy either. The film is really meant for general audiences who want to get into Formula 1 from scratch.
If you already have this in mind, then the movie should be a treat. Personally, I found it better to enjoy the film as a potential story mode campaign for F1 25 or a turn-your-brain-off popcorn movie with Formula 1 cameos peppered in (and the film has those aplenty).
F1 the Movie is out now in Philippine cinemas.
Entertainment
Forgotten Island is an upcoming film based on Filipino culture
The film features the talents of H.E.R., Liza Soberano, and Lea Salonga.
Despite all the Filipino actors in Hollywood today, it’s still difficult to feel scene in an industry where Filipino stories aren’t as abundant. Now, it’s time for the Philippines to shine. DreamWorks Animation has just released the first trailer for Forgotten Island, an upcoming animated film based on Filipino culture.
Played by H.E.R. and Liza Soberano, Jo and Raissa are childhood best friends about to go their separate ways after one decides to study abroad. However, during their last night together, they discover a magical portal that takes them to Nakali, the Forgotten Island.
The island calls itself home to an army of creatures from Philippine mythology including The Dreaded Manananggal (voiced by Lea Salonga). Dave Franco also plays a weredog named Raww.
Besides the presence of all these monsters, the island has an even more dangerous quirk. The longer that Jo and Raissa stay on Nakali, the more of their memories are erased until they eventually forget each other. It then becomes a race to find their way home before they lose memories of their friendship forever.
Supporting the main cast, the film will feature the voice talents of Manny Jacinto, Jenny Slate, Jo Koy, Dolly de Leon, Amielyn Abellera, and Ronny Chieng. It will be made by Joel Crawford and Januel Mercado, the prolific team behind the critically acclaimed Puss in Boots: The Last Wish.
Forgotten Island premieres in Philippine cinemas on September 23.
Entertainment
Marvel’s Wonder Man greenlit for a rare second season
The first season holds a 91% rating on Rotten Tomatoes.
Is the Marvel Cinematic Universe back? After years of floundering through Phases Four and Five, Marvel Studios is poised to get its mojo back from a flurry of much-awaited Phase Six projects this year, including the second season of Daredevil: Born Again, Spider-Man: Brand New Day, and Avengers: Doomsday. And it all started this year with the critically acclaimed Wonder Man. Now, after the success of that series, a second season is officially in the works.
When its first trailer came out, Wonder Man did not look like anything that Marvel Studios has worked on before. For one, it was incredibly grounded, perhaps overshadowed only by Daredevil: Born Again. Second, it was about the reboot of a fictional superhero movie, itself called Wonder Man.
Actor Simon Williams (played by Yahya Abdul Mateen II) wants to energize his career by performing in the upcoming Wonder Man revival from acclaimed director Von Kovak (Zlatko Burić). Helping the former is the returning Trevor Slattery (Ben Kingsley), who you might remember as the fake Mandarin from Iron Man 3.
Despite how different it looks compared to previous Marvel Studios projects, the series is one of the most acclaimed, currently holding a 91 percent approval rating on Rotten Tomatoes. Because of this, Wonder Man has received the green light for a second season, via Variety.
A second season is relatively rare for Marvel Studios with its history of one-and-done series. There are some exceptions, though. Loki, for example, ended its run with a second season. Daredevil: Born Again will air its second season very soon (with a third one potentially in the works already).
SEE ALSO: Marvel’s Wolverine gets a release date
There is a part of me that wants to say, if you want a feel-good, wholesome movie experience, go see Disney Pixar’s Hoppers.
But on the flip side, if you want an absurd, humorous, nonsensical-yet-totally-makes-sense dark comedy masked in an animated adventure, then you especially need to see it.
We can always argue that Pixar titles — and animated films in general — cater to adult audiences.
However, slotting in We Bare Bears creator Daniel Chong to helm this latest Disney Pixar masterpiece makes for a spectacularly unique ride.
It’s interestingly odd for a Pixar film, though not so far removed from the family-friendly, “happy ending” trope that feels unrecognizable.
I just personally loved Chong’s approach, driving the narrative with unpredictable humor, sharp twists, and a sci-fi premise that, come to think of it, isn’t actually theoretically impossible.
It’s so entertaining that you briefly forget you’re watching a Pixar movie. There are no dull moments and just a great ride from start to finish.
Nature vs. development
The premise is a familiar real-life dilemma we’ve seen for decades. In Hoppers, the suburban town of Beaverton where our protagonist Mabel lives, is under constant development.
Specifically, there’s the “Beltway Project”, an initiative by Mayor Jerry Generazzo, to connect residential areas to the town center via an elliptical highway.
As in reality, progress comes with collateral damage. In the film’s case, it’s the animals living in the local greenery.
Mabel isn’t going to let that happen. The movie quickly establishes her origin story in the first few minutes.
It shows how her relationship with her aging grandmother formed her special bond with “The Glade”. This lush forest was their favorite hangout as Mabel grew up. And that’s where she begun appreciating and caring for animals deeply.
Years have passed, and Mabel is now a fervent college student activist stopping at nothing to ensure the animals she grew up with can still live peacefully.
She has done a lot, from petitions to convincing people to support her cause. Without that many teammates by her side, she ultimately confronts the mayor herself. This is where she gets challenged to “make something happen” in 48 hours to convince the mayor to call the project off.
From ‘real’ to ‘sci-fi’
At this point, the movie dramatically switches from grounded reality to high-concept sci-fi. Mabel accidentally discovers her professor, Dr. Sam Fairfax, has developed an ambitious machine capable of transferring your consciousness into a robotic animal.
It was meant to observe animals harmlessly from a closer POV, and I guess you can give the professor the benefit of the doubt.
The entire scene reminded me of Jordan Peele’s Get Out briefly, but the tone shifts when Mabel ends up transported into a robot beaver body herself.
There’s an undeniable, hilarious callback to James Cameron’s Avatar here, from the disorienting “syncing” process to Mabel navigating the world in a body that isn’t hers. The only difference, obviously, is she isn’t a blue alien but rather a cute, child-visual-friendly beaver.
She finds new hope with this tech. But just as she thinks she can simply “communicate” with nature, she is slapped with the reality that in the wild, it’s survival of the fittest.
Logic takes a backseat
From then on, logic takes a backseat, yet it’s the kind of film where suspending your disbelief actually is helpful.
The “pond rules” were the only remaining glimmer of scientific accuracy but then, soon, you realize it would have been total chaos in the pond community just from a food chain standpoint.
Mabel gets introduced to King George and the inner workings of the community. There’s even a later chase when a flock of seagulls carry Diane, the gigantic shark referenced as the group’s “apex predator”, which is obviously impossible.
There’s just so many dumb rules (or lack of) that the internal logic made up for an even funnier film. It’s like Zootopia logic, but cranked up to an even more non-sensical level.
Dilemma
Anyway, Mabel discovers that the cause of the animals’ exodus are fake noise trees blasting high-pitched sounds. These are all the work of Mayor Jerry, doing it on purpose so the Beltway Project gets finished.
Mabel’s audacity leads to an Animal Council meeting, which was unlikely to begin with. Here, the leaders who each represent major animal classes come together.
The Insect Queen and her eventual Insect King son Titus get presented as the real antagonists, with a thirst for domination.
Mabel merely suggested scaring the Mayor back, but the animals decide on a dark uprising. With this, Mabel soon realizes the mayor is in danger.
The conflict is triggered further by her own human instinct when she kills the Insect Queen who annoyingly got into her face. This moment sends Titus into a vengeful rage even more.
This deepens Mabel’s dilemma as she now ironically has to side with the humans — including Mayor Jerry — while navigating the animals’ survivalist and territorial tendencies.
Standstill, unlikely team-up
However, after a long chase, and attempts to communicate with the mayor funnily with her impromptu-formed rag-tag squad, Mabel’s robot beaver eventually gets caught.
The Animal Council eventually discovers the humans’ experimental tech and turns it against them. Under the tutelage of Titus, the animals hold the scientists hostage and forces them to create a robotic clone of Jerry.
Titus’ goal was to use the mayor’s own noise trees meant to scare the animals away from The Glade against the humans gathered for a rally.
Just when all seems lost, the real Mayor Jerry shows a sudden flash of compassion. And perhaps with some Messianic complex involved, he hero-balls his way into a robotic beaver himself for a last-ditch effort to stop Titus.
A lot happened in between, presented with a hefty dose of comedy that keeps you guessing the characters’ fates.
Ultimately, the other animals realize Titus’ purely selfish and evil goals, and his plan backfires when he gets eaten by the Amphibian King.
In the end, the animals team up to destroy their community dam to flood a wildfire inadvertently started by Titus moments earlier.
Then, it’s a classic happy ending: The Glade is restored as a protected area, Mabel and Mayor Jerry reconcile, and the protagonist graduates with a job offer from Dr. Sam herself.
Absurdity ’til the end
The absurdity does not even end when the credits roll. In the post-credits scene, we see the elderly man Mabel previously encountered, who mistook her petition form for a grocery list.
After she takes care of her business at The Glade, Mabel sweetly fulfills the elderly man’s simple errand.
And handing the eggs, milk, and bread back to the man? Ants.
It’s as if it was a delightful Ant-Man nod, especially with the parallels between the logic there and in the MCU wherein a neurotransmitter is needed to lead ants in performing such tasks.
Perhaps, a final wink from Daniel Chong, whose direction makes up for a spectacularly good laugh.
-
Reviews1 week agoPOCO X8 Pro Max review: A new beast from the far east
-
News1 week agoPOCO X8 Pro Series: Price, availability in the Philippines
-
Reviews1 week agoPOCO X8 Pro Iron Man Edition review: Midrange phone in superhero armor
-
Automotive2 weeks agoVinFast extends free unlimited charging in 3 markets amid rising fuel prices
-
Philippines1 week agoThe HONOR X8d is serviceable
-
Reviews2 weeks agoSamsung Galaxy S26 Ultra review: A phone you live with
-
News1 week agoPOCO introduces X8 Pro Series with Dimensity 9500s
-
Gaming2 weeks agoNVIDIA’s DLSS 5 can turn your favorite AAA game into AI slop











