That will not last. The Great Stories will always return to their original forms.
It’s one of the most enduring quotes from the Sandman’s 75-issue run. Talking to the immortal Hob Gadling in the 18th century, Dream, the eponymous Sandman, comments on the transience of a new ending attached to Shakespeare’s King Lear written centuries past. It’s a testament to the endurance of stories despite the ravages of time.
In an age dominated by adaptations, The Sandman’s quote rings ever truer. The past few years have seen countless adapted titles dropped because of lackluster reception. The original forms, whether it be books or series made years past, have won time and time again. However, despite history weighing down against it, one adaptation has seemingly prevailed against Dream’s cautionary warning: The Sandman itself.
Enter the Dreaming
Premiering on Netflix, The Sandman adapts the first few story arcs from the original comic book run. The series stars Tom Sturridge as the titular character, complemented by a lively cast from television’s finest including Doctor Who’s Jenna Coleman as Johanna Constantine and Game of Thrones’ Gwendoline Christie as Lucifer. Plus, most critically, Neil Gaiman himself, the series’ author, is directly involved with the series, along with David S. Goyer.
The series itself is a long time coming. Since the original run ended, filmmakers and producers have sought to adapt the title for Hollywood. However, for all of 30 years, Gaiman rejected all efforts to create a Hollywood-friendly version of the popular series. Now, fresh from the success of the adaptations of American Gods and Good Omens, the acclaimed author is taking the reins himself to create the first good adaptation of Sandman. And why not? The title’s tales of inclusivity, responsibility, and story-making still ring true today.
A dream of me: a personal history
When I first read The Sandman, I was in high school. My sensibilities and interests were naturally different from what they are today. They were hardly mature enough to understand the intricacies of the series. In fact, my young mind was more interested in how Dream was an all-powerful protagonist capable of blowing his enemies away in a literal puff of sand. For me, Sandman was no different from Superman. Can you blame me? I was a teenager, after all.
While it’s fair to read the series in that way, The Sandman was so much more. More than a decade later, I reread the entire series, picking up hundreds of tidbits I missed my first go-around. I learned about the power of dreams on our reality and how dreams pervade regardless of culture or identity.
Now, if you’ve read The Sandman at any point in your life, you’ll understand how the series endured all these years as an essential fragment of the world’s literary oeuvre. If you haven’t read the series, however, you’ll still understand how things we’ve read or watched as children rarely look the same when we reread or rewatch them as adults.
The Sandman, as both a comic book and a television series, is no different.
A dream of change
A traditional comic book has around 20 to 30 pages from cover to cover. While the number is usually enough to tell a captivating story, it does have limitations. Stories and themes have to be summarized into small speech bubbles or boxes. In contrast, a television episode allows for more nuances: an actor’s expressions, additional dialogue, movement.
While the Netflix series maintains fidelity in adapting its source material, it also expands what was presented on the page. Instead of a static image of Dream brooding in captivity, you see the evolution of emotion from stoicism, hatred, to hope.
Further, you’ll see the evolution of Gaiman from an early-career author to an acclaimed one revisiting past works. When the series was first written, Neil Gaiman was a relatively fresh creator. As such, he was still exploring his literary voice. The early Sandman books reflect that, seesawing between different genres and tones. Now, decades after first writing the series, Gaiman has an opportunity to change and expand what he wrote before. The end result is magical.
For one, characters were made to be more inclusive. Instead of white men or women, iconic characters are played by characters who are Black, female, or both. For example, Kirby Howell-Baptiste and Gwendoline Christie slay as Death and Lucifer, respectively. Likewise, otherwise-detached stories are connected and expanded in new ways that make sense in the over-arching plot. It’s a change in fidelity, but one that is welcome in today’s ever-changing world. It expands Gaiman’s vision for a more inclusive reality in and out of dreams.
Netflix’s The Sandman is an evolution of both the book’s format and its themes. It pulls double duty, alluring both long-time readers and new visitors to the land of dreams. As such, you’ll find both readings — as a fantastical adventure and as a thematic exploration of humanity — in the television series.
Though Dream said that great stories will always return to their original forms, it’s time to evaluate what The Sandman’s original form is. Maybe this is what it was always meant to be. Maybe “original” doesn’t always mean the first one.
Should you watch The Sandman?
Absolutely.
If you’ve read the series before, you already know why. If not, The Sandman is a dark fantasy series. In essence, it’s a collection of stories spanning decades and centuries, loosely connected by the character called Dream and our own smaller dreams — to live forever, to be recognized for who we are, to be free, to just be. Just as the comic book had me turning the page endlessly, the Netflix series will have you clicking that Next Episode button until you reach the end.
SEE ALSO: New ‘Sandman’ trailer showcases the king of dreams
Entertainment
SEGA, Netflix announce Crazy Taxi film adaptation
1st in planned slate of film adaptations, including Sonic and STRANGER THAN HEAVEN
SEGA and Netflix have announced a new Crazy Taxi film adaptation. This will usher in a new collaboration era with the parties also developing adaptations for Sonic and STRANGER THAN HEAVEN.
Such a slate of future adaptations reflects the range of SEGA’s library as it draws on Netflix’s experience bringing beloved game worlds to new audiences.
The first project features Crazy Taxi, which will be written by Dan Gregor and Doug Mand. The beloved writing duo was behind the 2025 reboot of The Naked Gun.
Also on board to help helm the production are the same visionaries behind the Sonic franchise: Neal H. Moritz, Toby Ascher, and Toru Nakahara.
Crazy Taxi has been an arcade hit since 1999, putting players behind the wheel of a fearless cabbie racing the clock through chaotic city streets.
There’s flying off ramps, dodging traffic, and chasing tips with punk-rock energy that has become the series’ signature.
The latest title in the franchise, Crazy Taxi: World Tour, is set for a 2027 release. You can watch its trailer below:
Entertainment
Now Playing: Resident Evil
Horror and comedy join forces in Zach Cregger’s latest masterpiece.
The intersection between horror and comedy is separated by a thin wall of air. In modern times, we’ve seen comedy legends, such as Jordan Peele and John Krasinski, make the successful jump into horror. Some have theorized that laughter is a pain response, which links it to the adrenaline-filled thrill of experiencing horror. Personally, I believe that mastering comedic timing also complements the timing of scary moments in horror. Comedy-trained directors just get it. That’s why the melding of the two genres is always something to look for, and that’s why Zach Cregger’s Resident Evil is a must watch.
Coming from last year’s Weapons, Cregger established himself in the annals of horror history, despite learning the art of filmmaking from cult comedy classics like Miss March and The Whitest Kids U’Know. Weapons (and Barbarian before it) expertly balances the essentials of horror with dark comedy. If you’ve seen either of these movies, then you know what you’re in for with Resident Evil.
Based on the games or the past movies?
Resident Evil is tagged as second reboot of the movie franchise after 2021’s disastrous attempt, starring Kaya Scodelario, which barely registered a hiccup in the oeuvre of Resident Evil films. However, like 2021’s failure, Cregger’s take bases itself primarily on the events of the games, specifically around the plot of Resident Evil 2.
Bryan, a medical courier played by Austin Abrams, is tasked with delivering a top-priority package to Raccoon City. Unbeknownst to him, the way leading into Raccoon City (and the fabled city itself) is already overrun with mutated monstrosities.
And so, Bryan, a courier inexperienced with combat (much less surviving against zombies), must fight his way into the city to deliver his charge.
A worthy protagonist
Over the years, the franchise has seesawed between capable action heroes, like Leon Kennedy, and those who can barely survive, like Biohazard‘s Ethan Winters. On that scale, Bryan falls deeply into Winters’s side of the spectrum. He’s ill-equipped to survive a zombie apocalypse. He even admits that his barebones knowledge of guns comes from videogames. He attempts to shoot locks, thinking they’d work as they do in games. He is not a character you’d want to follow if you’re looking for a gruff man gunning down hordes of zombies with a machine gun.
But that’s exactly what makes this horror film worth watching. Bryan is us. Though there were times I was screaming at the screen because he wouldn’t do the obviously logical thing of running away from blatant traps, our fragile protagonist mimics how we would all react in a horrific situation: a deer in the headlights stuck staring.
Every situation feels more frightful. You don’t know how you’d react. He doesn’t know how he’d react. We’re just stuck trailing along for his ride. If he lingers too long looking at a zombie about to bite him, you have no choice but to look along with him. As a horror protagonist, he’s perfect.
When a camera does the work
Of course, inept protagonists aren’t new to horror. Practically all good horror films will feature a helpless hero standing up to the monster. See: the “final girl” era of horror.
Resident Evil elevates this trope by allowing the camera to do the heavy lifting. The film’s expert transitions into first-person perspectives and over-the-shoulder ones amp up the frights. When Bryan sweeps a room with a gun, the camera takes you down to the muzzle. You become the one sweeping along with him. You see the darkness as he does. The style creates an impressive layer of immersion that brings you into his trauma. Plus, if we’re going with comparisons, the transitions feel like a game taking you from a cutscene back into control of your character.
And it’s not just the perspectives, too. The film mimics several tense moments oft found in horror games, like gingerly creeping through a thin ledge when one false move can mean plummeting to your death. Resident Evil also has scenes in a dark tunnel, the sewers, and an overrun hospital. It’s a veritable who’s who of horror settings. But they all just work. It’s like you’re in a Resident Evil game.
When goofy becomes scary
But that’s enough of how the movie was made. How scary is it?
Taking them from their respective contexts, each monster is goofy. There’s an infirm zombie spewing acid bile that Bryan just bullies around. There’s a seemingly innocent young girl with a tentacle foot. There’s a zombie katamari.
And if that’s not enough, the casting is filled with masters of comedic timing like Paul Walter Hauser, Zach Cherry, and Austin Abrams himself. The first two play bumbling representatives of Umbrella Corporation, people who are too incompetent to do their job. Abrams is the bumbling everyman who can’t make heads or tails of what’s happening. Comedy is a living, breathing presence in this film.
But that’s not to say that this is a comedy film. The horror is still top notch. Cregger just knows how to time everything right.
Unlike modern films today, like in The Conjuring universe, Resident Evil is not a scare-a-minute film. It will not bombard you with jumpscares.
Now, to be fair, there are a fair bit including fakeouts. In fact, under normal circumstances, I’d dislike how many there are. But here, each jumpscare comes with a lengthy period to catch your breath. The film gives you time to relax, to laugh, and, eventually, lower your guard for the next scare. It’s a balanced pace that’s kept up throughout the entire film.
This is exactly how you should pace a horror movie.
Should you watch Resident Evil?
Even with its uniquely comedic style, Resident Evil is one of the most faithful adaptations of a video game I’ve ever seen. Like a game, Cregger’s pacing knows when to let you, the viewer, breathe and when to thrust you back into its monstrosities.
Humor will always go hand in hand with horror. Though the responses to these two categories are technically different, they’re both genres about facing the unexpected. On the box, Resident Evil says that it’s a horror film, but it’s so much more. If you want to laugh, cry, and cower in fear all in the same movie, this is the movie to watch.
Entertainment
Max vs 100 will feature Max Verstappen race against 100 go-karters
The live event will stream at midnight on September 17.
As a child, one of my favorite thought experiments is to imagine who would win in a fight between my favorite characters at the time and a number of other random beings. For example, will Superman prevail against 100 Magnetos? Those are the ways I kept my young mind occupied. Now, as a former child, I still do the same thing but with more realistic people, like imagining if Steph Curry can win against 100 high schoolers. This week, ESPN and Disney+ are making one of those imaginary fights real: Formula 1 legend Max Verstappen versus 100 go-karters.
In an upcoming live event streaming exclusively on Disney+, Max vs 100 will pit the four-time world champion against 100 go-karters from everywhere in pop culture. This gaggle of 100 will include popular content creators such as Twitch streamer ExtraEmily, car photographer Larry Chen, and NBA shooting coach Chris Matthews.
All 101 drivers will race around one of the most iconic tracks in Formula 1 history, Silverstone in England. The track will be reconfigured to match the special race.
Of course, this is more than just a parade of go-karts. Max Verstappen will start at the back of the grid, meaning he has to overtake all 100 racers to win. Now, the Dutch driver is no stranger to winning from the back. In 2024, he won the Sao Paulo Grand Prix despite starting from P17 (out of 20 racers). Max vs 100, though familiar for the driver, presents a different challenge. Can he overtake 100 times to win the race?
Max vs 100 will stream live through Disney+ on September 17, 12:00am PHT.
-
News2 weeks agoHUAWEI Pura X View is 2026’s first WIDE slab-type smartphone
-
News2 weeks agoThe CAMON Slim 5G is TECNO’s latest ultra-slim smartphone
-
News1 week agoiPhone 18 Pro series: Price, availability in the Philippines
-
Singapore1 week agoiPhone 18 Pro series: Price, availability in Singapore
-
News1 week agoiPhone Duo: Price, availability in the Philippines
-
News2 weeks agoHUAWEI Mate XT 2 tri-fold launches with Kirin 9050 Pro
-
News2 weeks agovivo introduces refurbished versions of X300 FE, X300 Ultra for less
-
News1 week agoiPhone Duo: Price, availability in Singapore






