Reviews

Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017) review

Published

on

Samsung’s pair of Galaxy S8 smartphones didn’t just change the landscape for flagships to come, but also upped prices like never before. As nice as they are to look at, they’re simply too expensive for the average consumer. Suddenly, Samsung’s midrange lineup is looking a lot more attractive.

Right smack in the middle is the 2017 edition of the Galaxy A5. It’s significantly better than the Galaxy A3 (2017) and Galaxy J7 Prime, yet not as close to premium pricing as the Galaxy A7 (2017) and Galaxy C9 Pro. Those are a lot of options, Samsung!

We’ve had the Galaxy A5 (2017) for a couple of months now, and feel like it’s more relevant than it ever was, especially with the shifting price points. I’ve broken down my test notes into several major points.

A nice throwback design to older Galaxies

It’s getting increasingly difficult to remember a time Samsung wasn’t focusing on curved displays to set itself apart — or, well, actually, before the Galaxy Note Edge started it all about two years ago. The newest Galaxy A5 has none of that, and instead settles for a traditional flat 5.2-inch display with moderately rounded edges.

While you could call this a lazy design choice, I appreciate the traditional feel of a phone that doesn’t try to cut my palms or slide off a table. The bezels may be on the thick side, but the bottom part is taken up by the navigation buttons and fingerprint scanner, which, by the way, is in its rightful spot — right, Samsung?

Class-leading protection from the elements

Looking past the so-so design, the real highlight here is the water and dust resistance. This Galaxy A5 is one of the few midrange smartphones to have such protection, and this can be a game-changer for those who need an IP68 rating without spending too much.

Dated software no one wants

The only thing more aggravating than a heavily bloated operating system is old software. The Galaxy A5, fortunately, isn’t a culprit of the former, but it does suffer from this sickness wherein it still doesn’t have Android 7.0 Nougat, which has been available way before the 2017 version of this phone launched. Marshmallow is fine, although the battery-saving features and more streamlined notifications and settings menu are exclusive to the newer version.

Yet another great display

Making up for the aging software is Samsung’s usual AMOLED display with its super-deep blacks and Full HD 1080p resolution. The good thing is you can adjust the tone of the screen through a simple setting, although Adaptive mode gets the job done 99 percent of the time.

A very well-placed loudspeaker

If there’s one thing the Galaxy J7 Prime did right, it’s the placement of its sole speaker, and the Galaxy A5 follows suit. The convenience of having it on the side, right beside the power button, is such a pleasure; no more blocking sound while holding the phone in either portrait or landscape orientation. If not for the blemish it creates on the frame, I bet Samsung would apply this placement on all its other phones.

Just the right specs

I admittedly had to check the specs sheet to figure out where the Exynos 7880 stands in Samsung’s line of in-house processors. Based on benchmark apps, it’s surprisingly slower than the what’s found in the much older Galaxy S6. I’m not complaining, though; outside of games like NBA 2K17 where graphics must be set to Medium at best, overall performance was snappy from launching the camera to multitasking.

You can’t, however, overwhelm the run-of-the-mill 3GB of memory. With more and more midrange phones adapting at least 4GB at this point, I expected better. On the bright side, 32GB of storage — which you can expand using any microSD you have lying around — is the base amount, giving you more than enough room for all your essential apps.

Balanced front and rear cameras

Interestingly, the numbers for the main and front-facing cameras are very similar: 16 megapixels with a bright f/1.9 aperture for both. The only difference is there’s no autofocusing for the selfie cam, but not many phones can do that in the first place. Here are some samples:

The results are certainly more than satisfactory, and can easily compete or even beat most camera phones in this class. Disappointment only came when focusing on poorly lit subjects; it felt like an eternity waiting for the camera to lock on simple objects right in front of it.

Battery performance meant to impress

This wouldn’t be a truly good Samsung device without its signature fast-charging. Topping up from zero to full takes less than two hours for the 3000mAh battery. And once you have a hundred percent, the Galaxy A5 can last as long as two days on moderate usage, but that’s if you have the Always On feature turned off. By having the time, date, and battery percentage constantly plastered on the screen even while asleep, you should expect an empty tank before going to bed.

Is this your GadgetMatch?

As I mentioned earlier, the Galaxy A5 (2017) is in a sweet spot, right at the center of every other Samsung offering. What makes this one special is its water and dust resistance. Sure, the more affordable Galaxy A3 (2017) has it too, but its specs are nowhere near as capable as the A5’s.

And that’s the beauty of the Galaxy A5: It’s so well rounded, there’s no need for it to impress you with anything more. At $400 in most markets (PhP 19,990 for the particular model I reviewed in the Philippines), it’s a fair deal until you look at some of the Chinese alternatives.

Vivo’s V5 Plus first comes to mind with its highly efficient Snapdragon 625 processor, 4GB of RAM, 64GB base storage, and best of all, dual-selfie cameras. That’s impressive for a phone that costs exactly the same as the new Galaxy A5.

There’s also the larger and beefier Galaxy A7 (2017). For an additional $80 (PhP 4,000), you get a 5.7-inch screen and 3600mAh battery. Not much of jump, so it’s just a matter of size preference.

SEE ALSO: Samsung Galaxy S8 and S8+ review

[irp posts=”12278″ name=”Samsung Galaxy S8 and S8+ review”]

Gaming

My Hero Academia: All’s Justice: A familiar Final War, made playable

Reliving the Final War

Published

on

My Hero Academia: All's Justice

There’s a certain expectation that comes with a My Hero Academia game, especially one billed as the “final chapter.” You expect big emotions, loud battles, and characters pushed to their limits. After spending time with My Hero Academia: All’s Justice, it’s clear Bandai Namco isn’t trying to reinvent the arena fighter formula. Instead, it’s refining what fans already know and framing it around the series’ most climactic arc.

Early on, the game feels immediately familiar. If you’ve played previous My Hero Academia console titles, you’ll know exactly what you’re getting into. Combat rhythms, camera angles, and overall pacing don’t drastically change. For casual fighting game players like myself, the differences feel more granular than transformative, but that familiarity makes the game easy to settle into.

My Hero Academia: All's Justice

One notable addition is the dual control scheme: “Normal” and “Manual.” Normal mode smooths out inputs, lowering the skill floor, while Manual mode is the classic arena fighter setup. Normal works but reduces player agency in ways that feel unusual. Outside of combat, the game also replaces a standard menu with a city-like hub. Playing as Deku, you pull up a smartphone-style menu to access modes, subtly increasing immersion.

Combat and battle system

Combat feels largely unchanged in speed but leans more aerial than expected. Characters spend a lot of time in the air, creating distance and forcing you to think about positioning. Aggressive players may struggle, as patience and smart movement are rewarded more than constant pressure.

Quirks are intuitive, even for newcomers to 3D arena fighters. Visual indicators clearly communicate cooldowns and power states. Some Quirks are tuned for balance, but they still feel faithful to the anime. Ultimate and cinematic moves are satisfying and feel earned, never spammy.

Character variety is a standout. Deku, Bakugo, and Shoto share similar combat prompts, but their Quirks dictate unique movement, attack patterns, and space control. Deku, in particular, feels beginner-friendly, making him a natural starting point.

Roster and character balance

The roster feels large without overwhelming the player. Final-form characters aren’t instantly dominant; the true power spike comes when a character enters a “Rising” state after being the last fighter, gaining buffs across damage and abilities. Villains are just as enjoyable as heroes, with Dabi proving particularly fun to play. Story mode also presents moments of genuine challenge, such as facing multiple opponents at once.

While it’s early to speak on balance issues, the game seems thoughtfully tuned so far. Beginner-friendly characters include Deku, Bakugo, and Shoto, while other fighters may require more experience to master.

Team Up Missions

My Hero Academia: All's Justice

Team Up Missions offer shorter, varied challenges that feel like playable mini OVAs. While not essential to the main story, they unlock legacy battles and extra content for fans.

AI allies are competent and punish reckless play, which makes team composition matter more than cosmetic choices. While these missions don’t dramatically expand the fantasy of teamwork, they add fun replayable content for single-player fans.

Story and cinematic presentation

My Hero Academia: All's Justice

Story mode is where All’s Justice shines. Experiencing the Final War interactively delivers the same giddy excitement as watching those moments unfold in the anime. It evokes memories of the Naruto Ninja Storm series, balancing spectacle and fan service. Transitions between gameplay and cutscenes are serviceable—neither jarring nor groundbreaking. 

The game assumes familiarity with the story, so newcomers may feel lost without prior anime knowledge. Battles often carry emotional weight, effectively allowing players to relive key moments of the Final War.

Visuals, performance, and audio

My Hero Academia: All's Justice

The game runs smoothly on PS5, even during effects-heavy fights. Character models are adequate, though not as sharp as hoped, while facial animations during story moments are expressive and well-done. The UI does enough to keep combat readable without distracting from the action.

Audio stands out. Voice acting delivers intensity, hit sounds feel impactful, and music consistently elevates big moments. The game is loud, but in a way that matches the over-the-top energy of the series.

Should you play My Hero Academia: All’s Justice

My Hero Academia: All's Justice

My Hero Academia: All’s Justice feels like a proper final chapter. It doesn’t overreach but delivers where it matters most. Competitive players will find depth, while anime fans can relive beloved battles interactively.

 It may not redefine the genre, but it understands exactly what kind of game it wants to be—and it delivers that confidently. 

The combination of familiar combat, a large and varied roster, cinematic story moments, and thoughtful extras like Team Up Missions makes it a satisfying experience for anyone looking to step into the shoes of their favorite heroes and villains.

Continue Reading

Reviews

nubia V80 Max: Long battery, marginal upgrades, casual budget phone

Upgrades here and there, but is the price increase worth it?

Published

on

The nubia V80 Max arrived in the Philippines with a noticeable price jump: PhP 6,499, up from the V70 Max’s PhP 4,799.

For it’s intended market — the budget-conscious users who are trying to make ends meet daily — those extra pesos matter a ton.

That’s why I’ve been torn on giving it a pass or no. I still am until now.

The V80 Max does tout durability upgrades and AI add-ons. The refreshed design also looks a bit more premium, ditching the circular camera island.

But all these improvements feel incremental or marginal. In the end, budget users need their phone to work as they try to survive each day too. From the get-go, using this device somewhat felt… non-enjoyable.

Performance: A bit unsteady

The nubia V80 Max is powered by a Unisoc T7250 processor with up to 1.8GHz clock speed. It can handle typing, messaging, and other light tasks.

However, just tapping on apps, loading them, and switching between them generally looked sluggish.

There’s also been slowdowns that weren’t experienced too much with the V70 Max, which my nephew even entrusted for PUBG.

I type quite fast, and to its credit, the nubia V80 Max has kept up. At least you can use this for endless chatting with friends and keeping loved ones updated.

But everywhere else, patience is required. Even just simulating a delivery rider’s routine and having navigation turned on was already pushed the phone past its comfort zone.

For gaming, I’ve played both Mobile Legends: Bang Bang and Need for Speed No Limits on the handset.

They are playable, although the overall experience may not be enjoyable due to sporadic connectivity issues and bare-minimum graphics.

Display: Bright but basic

In front, the nubia V80 Max has a large 6.9-inch IPS display that is similar to the V70 Max’s panel.

A notable improvement is 780 nits peak brightness. That’s a welcome upgrade for outdoor visibility.

However, the resolution maxes out at 720p for YouTube videos and other scenarios. That and a low pixel density make the display most specially underwhelming even for just photos of food.

They look a lot unappetizing and just makes you scroll down instead.

The thick bezels and black bars also lessen the audiovisual experience. Speaking of audio, the sound quality is just par for its segment. It’s not totally flat but far from a premium soundscape too.

Battery: Long-lasting, enough for light work

With a 6,000mAh battery like its predecessor, the nubia V80 Max can deliver a full day of light use. Besides, there’s not much “demanding” tasks you can do on it smoothly.

For basic communication all day, plus browsing and light gaming in between, you’ll surely have enough power left.

The only downside is that it takes about two hours to fully replenish back to full. That’s unlike other budget phones with 33W to 45W charging at the very least.

A nice surprise is Bypass Charging to power gaming and extended use.

Durability, water and dust resistance: For assurance

As nubia has previously mentioned, the V80 Max is practically the brand’s own entry to the “rugged budget phone” meta.

On paper, it has an IP64 rating and up to a 1.8-meter drop resistance. It’s always good to have these as extra insurance for parents handing phones to kids or workers in tough environments.

At the same time, it plays a part in the higher asking price. A cheap case and a lanyard should do the same without a price bump.

Cameras: Decent, with caveats

Lighting will always be your friend with a camera system like the V80 Max’s. The device comes with a 50MP main camera for decent detail and a 16MP counterpart in front.

It works, but your patience will definitely be tested. The results are fair to a point that the camera can be used for beyond documentation.

There was even one time I zoomed to 3X (in daylight) and the detail still looks amenable.

But forget quick captures. It takes time for the capture button to process your press. The camera demands stillness even after the snap.

To be fair, the colors are also decent — not washed out and totally dull. But in some cases, the color accuracy is off, especially for food and other red-hued subjects.

For good shots, just give them some post-processing, and they’re usable for social media.

One the other hand, low-light and night shots from both front and back shooters are predictably grainy and noisy.Selfies are also lighting-dependent for quality.

The camera UI could also use some upgrades. My palm also sometimes accidentally taps the right-hand side of the screen when holding the phone.

Design

As mentioned, nubia has ditched the familiar Android top-middle-of-the-back camera island in favor of this setup:

The three shooters protrude and are lined up vertically. You’ve definitely seen this arrangement from other Android brands, most notably Samsung’s previous offerings.

But it’s a new touch for nubia, while the power button being in red reflects their signature flair.

There are five colors, and mine was in Aurellia Gold which looks more of a light yellowish cream. The backside is smooth although the side frames provide enough friction for a good grip.

I’m pleased that the device didn’t come with bloatware out of the box.

Also, there are AI features here that are somewhat actually useful. The AI Scam Alert is worth utilizing so you can avoid getting disturbed.

Is this your BudgetMatch?

It’s an easy Swipe Left for me. Plain and simple, the phone is usable but unenjoyable.

There are some commendable aspects but the performance lags, the display underwhelms, and the price hike doesn’t feel justified.

Throw in a few more bucks, and you’ve got some better-balanced options and budget gaming phones. There’s also better camera systems and displays on other budget handsets.

I would say it’s still for consideration for those who really just need a communication tool. Students, entry-level workers, stay-at-home adults, and more.

But in the end, the upgrades do not outweigh the compromises. By now, even the most affordable phones should offer more than just survive drops. They must be able to at least keep up with users’ lives.

Continue Reading

Apps

Breaking up with Adobe Photoshop after 20 years

Wedding planning and Apple Creator Studio made me realize it was time

Published

on

Planning a wedding, even a small and intimate one, has a way of sharpening your sense of priorities. Right as my fiancé and I were making decisions for our city hall wedding here in New York City, Apple announced Creator Studio.

Creator Studio is a subscription service that gets you access to eight creative pro and productivity apps for US$12.99 a month, or US$2.99 if you’re a student or educator. The design app included in the subscription, Pixelmator Pro, is also available as a standalone purchase for US$49.99. Adobe Photoshop, my design software of choice for over two decades costs me US$22.99 a month.

Seeing those numbers next to each other made me pause. It’s not that I was unhappy with Photoshop. I was just suddenly made aware how expensive it is. I’d been paying more for a single tool than I could for an entire creative ecosystem.

Adobe Photoshop was my first foray into the world of graphic design

Creative Studio’s lower price point, along with the free trial, made me consider switching to Pixelmator Pro altogether. That’s something I never thought I would do. Photoshop was how I got into graphic design. It was my first love, and up until recently, I truly thought it would be my ride or die.

Getting to know Pixelmator Pro

If you’re not familiar, Apple’s Pixelmator Pro is a graphic design and image editing app that’s similar to Adobe Photoshop. In practice, it covers a huge amount of the same ground but with a very different philosophy around usability and design.

I tried Pixelmator Pro, mostly as a challenge because we were doing a YouTube video on Apple Creator Studio. Personally, I was lowkey excited to try something new.

The first time I loaded the app, I recreated our YouTube thumbnail template — all within 10 minutes — and I haven’t looked back since.

Familiar enough to feel effortless

One of the biggest reasons my transition to Pixelmator Pro was so easy is muscle memory. Many shortcuts behave the same way: cmd+T for transform, cmd+R to show rulers, cmd+J to duplicate layers, just to name a few.

Having used Photoshop since high school, it felt familiar and intuitive — the complete opposite of how it felt to try and switch to Adobe Illustrator many years ago.

Photoshop is how I got into graphic design. It was my first love, and up until recently, I truly thought it would be my ride or die.

Later, I learned that you can import PSD (Photoshop) files directly to Pixelmator Pro. Apparently I didn’t even need to recreate the GadgetMatch assets. It does a good job of converting and preserving layers.

Photoshop now feels archaic

After using Pixelmator Pro for a few days, going back to Photoshop felt jarring. The sharp edges of the UI felt cold and rigid. Everything was layered with popups, panels, and tiny interruptions.

Pixelmator Pro, in comparison feels warm, smooth and frictionless. Its user interface is very Apple-like — rounded edges, softer icons and buttons. The Creator Studio version also gets the new Liquid Design touch, with transparent menus and elements that feel dynamic.

I especially love the little things. Color adjustments live in one simple panel instead of being scattered across different windows. There’s an eyedropper tool beside every color picker with a magnifier built-in.

When you hover over tools, it shows you the shortcut (e.g. “R” for Repair). There are also subtle animations, like when you use the Color Fill tool to change your canvas color.

Pixelmator Pro’s UI is warm, snappy, and approachable

The differences in user experience are stark. Photoshop’s animations either don’t exist or are too abrupt for one to notice.

Smart tools without the noise

Photoshop has one clear advantage over Pixelmator Pro: Generative AI. It’s great and powerful especially when you need to save time.

I personally used it a couple of times before to save time on cloning, erasing, or expanding elements. Am I going to miss it with this switch? Something tells me I won’t.

Pixelmator Pro’s clone and repair tools, though seemingly so simple, work like a charm. And for how I usually manipulate images, those two are more than enough.

From digital to physical

If Pixelmator Pro was going to replace Photoshop in my workflow, wedding prep was the perfect time to give it a real world test — and it more than held its own. Its ease of use gave me permission to think outside the box, because I knew I had a reliable tool that can help me make it happen.

On the left, a Kufic-inspired wedding logo designed on Pixelmator Pro; on the right, 3D printed stamps

Since my fiancé is half-Iranian, I designed a logo combining our names, inspired by Kufic calligraphy, and I did it entirely in Pixelmator Pro. I developed that same logo further and designed a save the date, with color, also inspired by Kufic calligraphy. I went through a few iterations to come up with the final designs, which were made easier by the Shape tool and grid overlays.

My fiancé then took the logo I designed in Pixelmator Pro, converted it to 3D on Revit, and printed it into stamps in different sizes. One way we’re using it is to deboss the handmade pottery he’s making as one of our party favors.

There are a few more wedding pieces I’m designing on Pixelmator Pro in the coming weeks: our final invitation, and the custom stationery for the dinner that follows the ceremony.

Through this whole process, Pixelmator Pro never felt like it got in the way, or that it was limited. On the contrary, it feels like that enabler friend who says yes to every idea I have, and can actually help make them real.

Powerful, but approachable

The best way I can describe what using Pixelmator Pro is like is this: it’s a mix of Photoshop’s professional tools, Canva’s free library of assets, and Apple’s UI sensibility.

Shortly after Apple announced Creator Studio, Adobe rolled out significant Creative Cloud discounts. Are they threatened? They better be.

That makes it great for beginners, small business owners, and casual creators. Like Canva, it comes with some beautiful templates to help someone with zero experience come up with something good.

But unlike Canva, it still feels like a serious design tool. I can do so much of what I need using Pixelmator Pro but with UI that’s so much more approachable compared to Photoshop.

As the great philosopher Ariana Grande once said, “Thank U, Next”

I remember meeting Canva’s founders before launch and not fully understanding their mission to make graphic design accessible to everyone. Now I do.

It was never about replacing Adobe products and pro designers. What Canva did was fill a huge void we didn’t know existed. They democratized something that used to be reserved only for the privileged few.

Pixelmator Pro comes with free templates, assets, and mockups like this MacBook Pro and coffee packaging

Pixelmator Pro’s lower barrier to entry has potential to make a significant impact. My hope is it opens doors for people who were previously shut out of the graphic design world, and that it becomes something they can grow with, just as I did with Photoshop.

Adobe is still the industry standard

Switching to Pixelmator Pro wasn’t about rejecting Adobe, in the same way that Canva’s success did not kill Photoshop.

It’s worth noting that Adobe products are still the standard in the industry. A lot of companies rely on them, and most schools teach them. In a traditional design or agency environment, Photoshop and Illustrator are still the default language.

Even on Apple’s own Design Resources site for developers, the official design templates are built for Adobe Photoshop and Illustrator, not Pixelmator Pro. That says a lot about how embedded Adobe is in professional workflows.

Competition makes the space better

Apple Creator Studio, and tools like Pixelmator Pro, challenge Adobe’s near-monopoly in a really healthy way.

It’s not lost on me that trading Photoshop with Apple software actually keeps me locked into one ecosystem. But having more pro creatives try Pixelmator Pro can put pressure on the industry. A strong alternative that’s more cost effective can force titans and dinosaurs to evolve in a way the likes of Corel was never able to do.

Ideally, that means better products and fairer pricing for everyone. Shortly after Apple announced Creator Studio, Adobe rolled out significant Creative Cloud discounts. Are they threatened? They better be.

Pixelmator Pro’s intuitive UI makes switching from Photoshop easy peasy

Access matters, and at the end of the day, with a healthy competition in the market, it’s consumers that win. Canva is a great example of this. It made design tools accessible to those who aren’t professionals. It didn’t make everyone a great designer, just as a novice who tries Final Cut Pro today won’t become a pro video editor tomorrow. Design is still a craft you develop over time with practice.

Is Pixelmator Pro my GadgetMatch?

Photoshop still has its place. But for my everyday work, and occasional personal projects, Pixelmator Pro can do  everything that I need to accomplish, at a fraction of the cost.

It feels faster, lighter, and more alive. Honestly learning my way around new software has been so enjoyable — so much so that I feel a renewed sense of eagerness to try other design software like Blender and Figma.

Pixelmator Pro never felt like it got in the way, or that it was limited. On the contrary, it feels like that enabler friend who says yes to every idea I have, and can actually help make them real.

Wedding planning and Apple Creator Studio didn’t just make me switch to a new software. They also made me question how much I’ve been missing out on. How much of what I do is simply due to inertia?

Ending my longest relationship doesn’t mean it failed. I’m grateful for what Photoshop taught me. It helped shape the creative professional that I am today.

But alas, this is one area where my practicality wins over loyalty. Relationships — with people or with tools — only work when both parties keep showing up. There’s no room for complacency, despite the history.

Walking away from something that taught me so much feels bittersweet, but Pixelmator Pro fits the way I work now, and I hope it grows with me as I turn the next page.

Watch our review of Apple Creator Studio

Continue Reading

Trending