Cameras

The Sony ZV-E10 is exactly as advertised

Great for vlogging and beginners

Published

October 4, 2021

GadgetMatch

Sony’s newest vlogging camera — the Sony ZV-E10 — is the first in their vlogging series of cameras with an interchangeable lens. Does it make all the difference? Is it good for everyday use? And is it really built or vlogging? These are just some of the questions we tried to answer as multiple members of the team tried the camera for themselves. Here’s what we had to say.

What did you think of the build quality? Did it feel sturdy? Was it too light?

Leez: The Sony ZV-E10’s build is every minimalist’s pipe dream. It blends functionality and probability well. But, it is really light. So much so, that it was worrying at times. The lightness of the build is an obvious pro and a confusing con because your brain doesn’t think something light is particularly “sturdy”. But, I’d say after using it, it’s both lightweight and sturdy.

MJ: The Sony ZV-E10 feels lightweight when you use it to shoot photos and videos — even if you shoot single-handed. However, you can feel its weight when you use its grip. It felt sturdy, but I was scared the whole time since I’m used to heavier cameras. I thought I was going to drop it at some point.

Rodneil: Coming from someone who regularly uses an a6500, the ZV-E10 definitely felt light and not sturdy. But after using the ZV-E10, the ‘not sturdy’ claim may not be accurate. And its lightweight is perfect for its intended use of vlogging.

Do you think the overall controls and configuration would be easy for a beginner to get used to?

Leez: The Sony ZV-E10 doesn’t have a rough barrier of entry when it comes to learning how to use and play around it’s features. For me, it was pretty simple and easy to use. If there’s a catch though, it would be the painful focus.

I’m more used to manual focus since my camera’s focus is broken. But, while using the ZV-E10 to shoot, it had gone completely out of focus for a good half hour. It took a while to fix the focus but it does seem that the camera struggles a lot with figuring out what the subject is–favoring what is closest to the camera. So, I’m assuming this would be a nightmare for someone who likes working with foreground shots.

MJ: If it’s your first time to have a camera, you’d probably learn it quickly. Assuming that Sony is also your first. But if you’ve used different cameras before (and still consider yourself a beginner), you might have a hard time, too. Which is what happened to me.

The ZV-E10 and I played tug-of-war when it came to controlling our shots. For instance, the camera suggests a subject to focus on, even if it wasn’t my intended subject and I was aiming for an uncommon shot. To put it simply, the ZV-E10 works for a beginner’s hand and eye rather than someone experienced.

Rodneil: I think, for everyone who’s answering here, we all had a bit of trouble with focus. Sony’s autofocus is fantastic especially when detecting faces. But it’s a bit of a disadvantage when you’re taking product images with the model’s face visible in the frame. The autofocus prioritizes faces which isn’t always to our liking. However, again, for its intended vlogging-use, it’s fantastic.

It shouldn’t be hard to figure out for any first-timer. You won’t be overwhelmed with too many physical dials and controls. There will be an adjustment for more experienced users, but for anyone just starting, it shouldn’t take too long to get used to.

Is there anything in your usage that particularly stood out?

Leez: Most of the camera features are useful. It was reliable and easy to access. But, if there’s something that I appreciate about the ZV-E10, it’s that it’s really lightweight. I just don’t particularly like lugging around heavy equipment when shooting or filming so, making sure it didn’t weigh heavy on my flimsy arms was a huge plus. Perhaps, that’s why most people often end up filming and vlogging with their phones sometimes: most cameras are heavy and bulky to bring along. I think the ZV-E10 lives up to what it promises in that regard.

MJ: I have a love-hate relationship with beautification. Sometimes I like it since it helps when I’m looking worn out after being out in the sun. But sometimes, the smoothing is unnecessary when you badly want to highlight details.

Rodneil: Personally, I struggled with the general lack of granular control. I didn’t realize I adjust so much per shot using my own camera. It was only after using the ZV-E10, which encourages a more point-and-shoot approach, that I became more aware of my camera-shooting habits.

Do you think the interchangeable lens would be useful for people just getting into vlogging/content creating?

Leez: Yes. It might be a bit daunting at first for people starting out but it’s a good foundation to build upon more creative outputs. It lets anyone start wherever they are in experience with photography, vlogging, and content creation.

MJ: Definitely. If you know what lens works for you and your content. It also helps with improving your style and quality, since not all vlogs require a talking head. I follow several vloggers who take cinematic content, so I know it’s possible.

Rodneil: I’m on the fence on this one. Yes, because it offers versatility and that’s always a good thing. No, because the lenses are probably going to be heavier if not weigh just as much as the camera. That’s going to present some challenges while shooting. But I guess that’s a minor inconvenience compared to the benefit and more long-term use you’ll likely get.

Which lens did you end up using the most?

Leez: I used the 35mm for filming and photographing portraits and sweet bakes. It captured detailed shots but again, the focus was a stuttering mess sometimes so, be warned.

MJ: Prime lens! 50mm works for showcasing details, and I’m very particular about highlighting the important part rather than talking in front of the camera.

Rodneil: We’re all fans of prime lenses BUT that’s because we primarily take product shots. That lens isn’t exactly made for vlogging. You’re better off using the kit lens for that.

Is this something you think most people can easily pack and carry around on a trip? Or on the daily?

Leez: Yes, definitely. I think for the interchangeable lenses, it would be good to bring two depending on what your trip is for. A wide lens, a portrait lens, and the prime lens are more than enough, you can even strip it to a wide lens and the prime lens if you want to capture intimate close up moments while having a lens to switch to to capture the stunning outdoors.

MJ: Granted you don’t use every lens you have on hand, this is easily something you can carry wherever you go. You can slip it in fashionable bags that don’t look like camera bags, too, so you can shy away from the eyes of thieves.

Rodneil: Most definitely. I’d say pack the camera along with the kit lens and your preferred prime lens and you’ll pretty much be ready for any shooting scenario when you travel. It’s light, compact, and easy-to-use. It’s a perfect upgrade to the quick shooting we normally do on our smartphones.

Is there any feature that you wish it had?

Leez: There’s not much to ask more from the ZV-E10. It’s good and reliable as it is. If there’s one gripe I have with it, it’s the autofocus. If they could tinker with its autofocus to not freak out or stutter as much as it does, that would be amazing.

MJ: Not really. It feels solid for what I intend to use it for, for now. Who knows? Maybe along the way, I’ll end up looking for a feature that it doesn’t have.

Rodneil: I think it’s mostly fine as it is and for what it’s aiming to be. The features and overall build are geared towards vlogging. It’s great for its intended purpose.

The Sony ZV-E10 retails for PhP 39,999/ SG$ 999/ US$ 798.

Cameras

Sony introduces its 1st Fisheye Zoom G Lens

Broad range for landscapes, architecture, sports, and video production

Published

September 9, 2026

GadgetMatch

Sony has just launched its first fisheye zoom G Lens for full-frame Alpha E-mount cameras: the Sony FE 8-14mm F3.5 Fisheye G. It will be available from late September for an SRP of US$ 1,599.99 / SG$ 2,049.

The 8 mm to 14 mm zoom focal range covers a broad set of fisheye perspectives in one compact lens.

At 8 mm, the lens shoots circular fisheye with a 180-degree angle of view projected as a circular image on a full-frame sensor.

Meanwhile, at 14 mm, it shoots diagonal fisheye across the full frame with a 180-degree diagonal angle of view.

Users can match the angle of view and composition to the subject and creative intent, across various scenarios like landscapes, architecture, sports, and more.

An optical design with ED (extra-low dispersion) glass and aspherical elements suppresses chromatic and other aberrations across the image area.

This enables high resolution throughout the zoom range with fast and precise autofocus and Linear Response MF. All these while suppressing focus breathing and operating quietly for movie production.

Controls include a focus mode switch, zoom lock switch, and an aperture ring with switchable click stops.

A minimum focusing distance of 0.15 meters and maximum magnification of 0.22x at the telephoto end also allow close-up fisheye perspectives both for stills and movies.

The Sony FE 8-14mm F3.5 Fisheye G measures about 63.1 mm in maximum diameter and 82.8 mm in length.

It weights about 314 grams, giving it mobility for handheld, gimbal, and rig-based shooting. It is also dust and moisture-resistant with a fluorine coating on the front.

In addition, users can opt for a dual-lens configuration with the VENCE Extension System Mini.

Cameras

DJI Osmo 360 II review: Going all-in on the ecosystem

I’m finally leaving my Insta360 X5 behind!

Published

September 2, 2026

MJ Jucutan

I’ve been shooting with the Insta360 X5 for a year. Trail runs, races, city trips, training sessions, all of it in 360.

I’ve held onto footage from that camera that I still watch back for no reason other than to remember what a particular morning felt like. I liked it enough that I wasn’t in a rush to switch anything.

After a month-long vacation carrying only the DJI Osmo Pocket 4P, I started thinking about consolidating it into a full DJI ecosystem instead, since I’d already tested and geared up with a Pocket, a Nano, an Action 6, and most recently, the Lito X1. The X5 was the one outlier left.

I never got to try the original Osmo 360, not until I saw my friend, Kyle Vergara, using one when we were in Boracay. Watching him shoot with it planted the idea before I even knew I wanted it.

So I waited for the DJI Osmo 360 II to see if it was worth the switch, half hoping it wouldn’t be, since switching meant admitting I was ready to let go of a camera that had been good to me.

Insta360 released the X6 around the same time, and as a creator, it was tempting. But between the workflow I already had and the cost of the gear, the math didn’t work out.

Anything leaning hard into AI these days comes with a jacked-up price tag, and the X6 wasn’t an exception. The Osmo 360 II has its own AI features, but the price is still bearable.

Price

The Standard Combo starts at PhP 32,490, with the Osmo Extreme Battery Plus, a Camera Protective Pouch, a cleaning cloth, an Osmo 360 Silicone Lens Cap, and a USB-C to USB-C PowerDelivery cable included.

@gadgetmatchThe new DJI Osmo 360 II is here with 1-inch 360° imaging, native 8K/60fps, and AI SuperNight 2.0! ✨♬ original sound – GadgetMatch

The Adventure Combo, which is what I got, runs PhP 39,490 and adds two extra Osmo Extreme Battery Plus (2150mAh), an Osmo Multifunctional Battery Case 3, an Adjustable Dual-Direction Quick-Release Adapter mount, and a 1.2m Invisible Selfie Stick.

For rider friends, there’s also a Limitless Riding Combo at PhP 34,490, which pairs the Standard Combo with an Osmo Heavy-Duty Clamp Mount kit.

Build

Coming from the X5’s lengthy monolith shape, the Osmo 360 II looks like a square monolith that fits in the palm of my hand.

The smaller footprint makes it easier to switch between portrait and horizontal orientation when shooting single-lens.

It’s heavier than the X5, though, and I noticed that weight almost immediately the first time I clipped it onto a mount, like the camera wanted me to know it meant business.

The design feels sturdier than its predecessor, and it now has a replaceable lens for when you scratch it, instead of a trip to a service center.

Performance

The Osmo 360 II arrived during a rough month for shooting in the Philippines. We were hit by one storm after another, with barely any sun in between, and there were days I genuinely wondered if I’d get to test this camera the way I wanted to before a deadline caught up with me.

I’d planned to test it on my usual trails, but landslides closed them off, so the next best option was a car-free Sunday in Ayala Triangle while the sun cooperated.

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by mj (@hemjaye)

It wasn’t the adventure footage I had in mind, but making a plain Sunday in the city look like it mattered turned out to be its own kind of satisfying.

360 video now shoots at 8K60, up from 8K50 on the previous model, with the bitrate raised from 170Mbps to 220Mbps.

Single-lens shooting tops out at 4K60, though 4K50 is the recommended setting. Daytime footage looks excellent, especially for anything meant for social with a slightly different perspective than the usual flat shot.

Scrolling back through those Ayala Triangle clips later that night, I caught myself smiling at angles I wouldn’t have thought to frame on a regular camera.

Night footage is where I’ve historically had issues with this category of camera, and I still don’t love straight Video mode after dark. But the new model claims 14.5 stops of dynamic range with its low-light processing, and shooting in Boost Video and SuperNight modes noticeably improves low-light results.

Photos hold up well too. Single-lens stills shoot ultra-wide at up to 30MP, and panoramic 360 photos go up to 120MP HDR.

RAW photo support is new this generation, and it’s this type of addition that made me want to slow down and actually shoot stills again instead of treating this as a video-only device.

Storage

AI features pushing further onto these devices has driven up demand, and prices, for RAM and storage across the board.

MicroSD cards, SSDs, even cloud storage all cost more than they used to, and I’ve felt that pinch every time I’ve had to buy a new card just to keep shooting through a busy week.

What I appreciate about DJI’s new lineup this year is the built-in storage, over 100GB on the Osmo 360 II. Paired with a microSD card, I’m not scrambling to back up mid-shoot just to free up space, which matters given how fast 4K and 8K footage eats through storage.

Not watching a storage warning pop up in the middle of something I can’t reshoot is a relief I didn’t know I needed.

Ecosystem

Before this, the X5 was the one device in my kit that didn’t run on DJI. Now that the Osmo 360 II is in the mix, footage lands in the DJI Mimo app the same way it does from everything else I own.

I’m not juggling two apps or two export flows anymore. Previously, files from the X5 would sit untouched longer than I wanted, simply because everything else I owned already funneled into Mimo and this one didn’t.

I can’t count how many times I opened my phone meaning to edit something, only to close it again because the file was sitting in the wrong app.

Editing 360 footage in the app is straightforward, with tools built for actually shaping the story rather than handing it off to AI.

Trimming, tracking, GyroFrame for dynamic movement, motion blur adjustments, multi-clip cuts and exports in one pass. If you do want AI in the loop, there’s Highlight Auto Selection to help surface usable scenes for reels.

Insta360’s ecosystem likely has comparable editing depth. What’s different for me is having it all live in one app instead of splitting my workflow across two, and how much lighter that’s made the whole process feel by the end of a shoot day.

Is the DJI Osmo 360 II your GadgetMatch?

If you’re already using DJI across your gear and your workflow, the Osmo 360 II is an easy yes.

It fixes a real complaint from the first generation, folds into one ecosystem instead of two, and comes in at a price that’s hard to argue with.

Letting go of the X5 turned out to be less of a loss than I expected. It’s more like finally closing a tab I’d left open for a year.

Swipe Right if you want hardware upgrades that solve a genuine complaint from the first generation, one ecosystem instead of two, and a real price advantage.

The DJI Osmo 360 II is built for someone focused on storytelling and getting the most out of the gear they already own, rather than someone chasing the newest AI-editing tools.

Swipe Left if you want AI-driven editing front and center, or you’re already settled into Insta360’s ecosystem.

Cameras

Insta360 Luna Ultra review: My new solo coverage camera

Changed my workflow

Published

August 26, 2026

Rodneil Quiteles

I’ve been using the Sony a6500 with a 35mm f/1.8 lens for the past six or seven years. There’s a certain level of comfort and familiarity that comes with using the same camera for that long. My workflow with it is automatic at this point.

That’s why it took some time for me to get comfortable with the Insta360 Luna Ultra.

I wasn’t familiar with using a gimbal camera. When I first started using the Luna Ultra, it felt awkward. I was also trying to figure out too many things at once.

But after several weeks of using it for different kinds of coverage, I’ve reached a point where I’m comfortable leaving my old reliable behind, especially when my priority is making Reels.

And it was my most recent overseas work trip to Shenzhen, China, where I finally realized that.

Finding my footing

I brought the Insta360 Luna Ultra to three events almost immediately: Samsung Vision AI, the TCL A400 Art Launch, and an ROG event.

That first week was really experimental. I was trying out multiple features of the device for this review. I tried shooting horizontally because it seemed like that’s what the Luna Ultra was made for.

But my work over the past few years has focused heavily on vertical short-form video, so that contributed to the awkward feeling.

I also defaulted to PureVideo after a while because I tend to shoot in really not-well-lit locations. The colors look good as is, anyway.

I experimented with I-LOG, too. That taught me that it should probably be reserved for actual experimental outputs, rather than anything tied to a deadline. Our workflow is built for speed with quality, and I-LOG adds another step that isn’t always necessary for the kind of news-oriented Reels we make.

The detachable controller, meanwhile, was a godsend when I’m shooting by myself and want the Luna Ultra to be at a distance. I still had the preview and controls nearby, and that was extremely helpful.

The biggest thing I learned during that first week was that I was trying to speed-run through all of the features instead of figuring out which ones actually made sense for the Reels I needed to make.

It was only when I decided what I actually needed for each coverage that the Luna Ultra really clicked with me.

@gadgetmatchThe best way to test a creator camera? Use it while creating. We brought the Insta360 Luna Ultra to multiple media events to see how it handles real-world coverage. From low-light venues to fast-paced launches. Here’s what we learned so far. Full review coming soon. #Insta360 #LunaUltra♬ original sound – GadgetMatch

Getting more comfortable

Most of the learning curve came down to overall usage and figuring out how I could maximize the camera.

There’s still plenty that I don’t know about the Luna Ultra. There are camera tricks and shots that can certainly elevate some of my footage. But I’ve decided to lock in on how it’s useful to me during fast-paced coverage and slowly unlock its capabilities as I spend more time with it.

Getting reps with a device is the best way to become familiar and comfortable with it.

For now, I can say I’ve found my preferred base settings that cover most of my needs. The next goal is to slowly level up, learn its capabilities more, and figure out how I can apply them to the Reels I make.

That process continued outside of traditional tech events.

Putting it to work

I brought the Insta360 Luna Ultra to a pottery session arranged by Shokz. It was a completely different kind of environment from the launches and media events I usually cover.

For the most part, I just set it up, pointed it at me, and let it roll.

My hands were busy, so I found myself wishing it had a way to automate certain capture features. Hands-free controls would be useful, for example. I’d also love an option to automatically record 30-second clips at a time for a set amount of time.

That would be useful when you’re shooting solo and doing an activity.

It was also around this time that I started figuring out some of the conditions necessary to get the bokeh effect I wanted.

@gadgetmatch Came for the pottery. Stayed for the vibes. 🏺 Featuring the Shokz OpenDots 2, because apparently good audio is required while discovering you have zero pottery skills. #PowerMacCenter @Power Mac Center @SHOKZ ♬ original sound – GadgetMatch

While unboxing the Shokz OpenDots 2 right before the pottery session, I got a sense of the distance needed when using 1x zoom to get that bokeh effect. Not long after, I also figured out the conditions necessary to get that effect with 3x zoom.

That was crucial for the mostly product-focused stuff that I shoot.

The more I used the Luna Ultra, the more I started understanding not just what it could do, but what I could realistically ask it to do during my work.

Then came the real test.

Shenzhen was the turning point

When I went to Shenzhen, China, to cover the launch of the HONOR Robot Phone, I didn’t have my old reliables as a crutch.

It was a make-it-or-break-it situation.

I needed to get as many product shots as possible. I had to show the design of the phone, its mechanical gimbal camera, and what it was like to shoot with it.

And the Luna Ultra was very capable.

The real issue was my unfamiliarity with it.

Once I figured out the settings I needed and narrowed down the shots I had to take, everything flowed rather smoothly.

@gadgetmatch HONOR Robot Phone 🤖📱 ✅ 4DoF mechanical gimbal ✅ 200MP Agile Gimbal Main Camera ✅ 200MP periscope telephoto camera ✅10-bit ARRI LogC3 recording ✅ 50MP ultra-wide camera ✅ Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 Mobile Platform ✅ 7,060mAh silicon-carbon battery #HONORRobotPhone @honorglobal ♬ original sound – GadgetMatch

Some of it still felt unnatural because I’m used to using my camera for both photo and video. This time, I focused on shooting video with the Luna Ultra and used a flagship smartphone for the photos.

That whole setup still needs refinement, but I feel like I found a workflow I can lean on.

Most importantly, I got all the shots I needed.

Any challenges I faced were mostly due to the shooting environment and my own general familiarity with the Luna Ultra. As for the tool itself, it was fantastic.

The moment that really solidified this for me was when I started reviewing the footage and saw that many of the shots came out better than I expected.

That’s when I realized I could actually use this as my coverage camera.

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by Rodneil Quiteles (@rodneil)

A different kind of coverage camera

My usual event workflow is pretty straightforward. I secure the device, then get as much footage of it as possible from different angles, show different use cases, and capture its features as quickly as I can.

The Luna Ultra fit into that workflow better than I expected.

For one, I can include myself in the frame while still being able to preview what I’m shooting. That’s something I couldn’t easily do with my old reliable setup.

It’s also much lighter and thinner, making it easy to position in ways I couldn’t with my old setup.

I think the video quality is overall better than the smartphones I use, too. The bokeh I get is also natural.

That doesn’t mean my Sony a6500 is suddenly obsolete.

I think dedicated mirrorless cameras, paired with the right lenses, just have a certain look to them that I generally prefer. I’d definitely still reach for the a6500 for photos and shoots where I have a team with me.

But for solo coverage, my go-to video gear will now be the Luna Ultra.

That’s the biggest change for me.

The Luna Ultra didn’t necessarily change what I consider worth shooting at an event. That’s still a case-by-case thing.

Instead, it enabled me to shoot better even when I’m on my own, which honestly isn’t always the case.

There’s still room to grow

I don’t think I’ve come close to unlocking everything the Luna Ultra can do.

I-LOG is one obvious example. But that feels like something for a different type of project rather than the generally news-type Reels we do.

Our workflow is built for speed with quality, and the Luna Ultra, even when using its basic settings, fulfills that.

I definitely want to try more experimental shots, more shots with movement, and the like. I just haven’t found the right opportunity for them yet.

There are also some things I’d like to see improved.

As mentioned earlier, hands-free and preset shooting automations could help, especially for solo creators. That could make it easier to capture activities without having to comb through too much footage with enormous file sizes.

I also wish it had some form of open-gate recording. That would give the footage more versatility and make it easier to use the same footage for multiple aspect ratios.

And while the Luna Ultra is now my preferred tool for solo video coverage, I’d still choose the a6500 for photography or when I have another team member shooting with me.

Is the Insta630 Luna Ultra your GadgetMatch?

For anyone looking for a dedicated video-taking tool.

Content creation focused on video has skyrocketed. If you’re part of that movement, the Insta360 Luna Ultra is certainly a good investment to add a little extra to your videos.

It’s fairly easy to use, but it also supports deeper features that can elevate your footage and your content.

I think you should consider the Luna Ultra if you want to upgrade from shooting primarily with a smartphone, or if you want a video-shooting device that’s much easier and lighter to carry around than most traditional mirrorless cameras.

For me, the answer is a little more specific.

It’ll be my go-to now, especially for solo coverage trips.

If you asked me to leave just one camera at home tomorrow, though? Oof. Just one?

Maybe still the a6500. It’s hard to break a habit.

But the Luna Ultra is a very close second.

Still discovering what’s possible

After using the Luna Ultra for all of this, I think it’s opened up new possibilities for the way I personally handle solo shoots.

It’s unlocked certain shots for me, and I haven’t even used it to its full potential.

That’s what excites me most.

I already found a workflow that suits the way I cover events. I already know I can leave my old reliable behind when the priority is video.

Now I want to see what happens when I actually learn everything else the Luna Ultra can do — that makes this an easy Swipe Right for me.

Pricing and availability

The Creator Bundle comes with the Insta360 Mic Pro which is great but I haven’t had the chance to use all that much because I am not a yapper on video.

The Insta360 Luna Ultra starts at US$799 (₱46,790) for the Standard Bundle, while the Creator Bundle retails for US$999 (₱59,490). It is available now through Insta360’s official channels and authorized retailers.