Apps
Big tech companies abused their market position – US antitrust subcommittee report
Amazon, Google, Apple, and Facebook effectively monopolized key market segments
Last year, the US Senate Committee on the Judiciary initiated an investigation into the supposed monopoly of “big tech” companies. These big tech companies include Amazon, Apple, Facebook, and Google. The investigation reached a climax this year, with CEOs of these companies attending highly-publicized hearings regarding their companies’ market standing.
Now, the investigation has wrapped up. The Subcommittee on Antitrust, Commercial, and Administrative Law recently released a report detailing the investigation. In the report, the subcommittee found out that big tech companies abused their market position through monopolies and aggressive market expansion.
SEE ALSO: Everything you need to know about the congressional big tech hearing, Part 1 | Part 2
Key takeaways
The subcommittee report revealed key problems regarding big tech’s common business practices. All companies were found to be acting as an “exclusive gatekeeper” on “key channel of distribution”. That is, these companies acted as monopolies on market segments of their own products. Furthermore, these companies “charged exorbitant fees, imposed oppressive contract terms, and extracted valuable data” from individuals and businesses.
The subcommittee also found on its investigation that companies used their monopolies to maintain market position. Practices identified to maintain dominance include identifying key rivals, buying them, or copying their selling features.
The report also stated that these big tech companies are able to maintain further dominance by abusing their intermediary position. It even named the ways how the abuse was carried out: through “self-preferencing, predatory pricing, or exclusionary conduct”.
Further details about how each big tech companies abused their position were also included.
Internal communications obtained by the subcommittee reveals that Facebook used acquisitions to cut off potential startups and business threats. The report’s finding suggests that the company’s growing monopoly towards social networking created further internal divisions. In an obtained memo, it was revealed that the company is more concerned with the “rivalry” between its platforms, specifically Instagram.
In the end, the report noted that Facebook’s monopoly led to the deterioration of its platform over time. This led to the neglect of privacy protections and the eventual rise of misinformation, the report added.
For Google, its rise to dominance in search happened through a string of anti-competitive practices. Documents obtained by the subcommittee revealed that the company misappropriated content from third-party providers. When it became a monopoly, it injected search results with its own ads and content, effectively blurring the distinction between organic results and its own.
Other tactics used by the company to maintain dominance are exclusive contracts and diversification. For the former, the report noted how Google forced Android manufacturers to bundle their own apps and services as the default for users. For the latter, the company exploited market segments such as web browsers (Chrome), navigation (Maps), and internet-of-things (Cloud).
Lastly, it was concluded that Google used massive amounts of data from users to reinforce market dominance and capitalize further on its advertising revenue.
Amazon
For Amazon, the report noted that the company is now the dominant leader in the US for online shopping. Amazon’s dominance meant that small and medium businesses have no other alternatives for reaching out to online consumers. Over the years, the company also brought competitors to cut off any alternative online shopping outlets.
Worse, the subcommittee found that the company engaged in anti-competitive practices with its third-party sellers. Obtained internal documents showed how Amazon treated its partners as internal competitors. The company exploited its seller’s data to improve its own line of products — Amazon Basics.
The subcommittee further noted that Amazon has the potential for abusing the market segments where Alexa (voice assistance) and Amazon Web Services (cloud computing) operates.
Apple
The subcommittee concluded its overview of findings with a look at Apple’s tactics over the mobile market. The company exerts dominance over the mobile market and services, owing to the huge popularity of iOS and iPads. This dominance, the report notes, is apparent with the company’s leverage of the App Store in enforcing barriers and cutting off competition.
The maturation of hardware sales also moved Apple to increase sales of its own apps and services. This even compelled them to raise commissions and fees on the App Store, the report noted. Combined with absolute control over the App Store, the company effectively harmed consumers and businesses and reduced app innovation.
Moving forward
All of the big tech companies have individually put out a response in the wake of the findings. Unsurprisingly, all of the responses denied the report’s allegation.
Finally, the report also gave some recommendations moving forward. These recommendations are: addressing anti-competitive practices in the digital market; strengthening the enforcement of anti-trust laws and regulations; and finally, improving anti-trust regulations through other mechanisms.
These recommendations, however, do not recommend any concrete actions. It will be interesting to see how the US government responds in general to these recommendations. Perhaps, it could affect any future proceedings on anti-trust cases like the one facing Apple now.
Doomscrolling is the greatest enemy to everyone’s productivity today. The temptation to keep on scrolling for hours is an ever-present temptation. Taking a very strong stance against the phenomenon, the European Commission is now investigating TikTok for having an addictive interface.
Via Politico, Brussels is now prodding TikTok to change its interface. Very technically, the European Commission is not out to get doomscrolling, specifically. However, the major changes that they want to introduce “disabling infinite scrolling, setting strict screen time breaks, and changing its recommender systems.”
App addiction is a persistent problem today. Besides concerned parents, governments around the world have been trying to regulate addiction, especially when it comes to children. The European Commission, as is apparent from this new initiative, is at the forefront of preventing addiction.
Though the target is explicitly TikTok right now, changing addictive interfaces will also affect other social media platforms including Facebook, Instagram, and X. Most platforms nowadays thrive on encouraging users to keep scrolling through more content.
Right now, TikTok isn’t set to change just yet. However, the report states that the European Commission is willing to work with platforms for a better, non-addictive interface. It’s less abrasive than the region’s recent privacy initiatives, which requires users to verify their age before accessing mature content.
Apps
Breaking up with Adobe Photoshop after 20 years
Wedding planning and Apple Creator Studio made me realize it was time
Planning a wedding, even a small and intimate one, has a way of sharpening your sense of priorities. Right as my fiancé and I were making decisions for our city hall wedding here in New York City, Apple announced Creator Studio.
Creator Studio is a subscription service that gets you access to eight creative pro and productivity apps for US$12.99 a month, or US$2.99 if you’re a student or educator. The design app included in the subscription, Pixelmator Pro, is also available as a standalone purchase for US$49.99. Adobe Photoshop, my design software of choice for over two decades costs me US$22.99 a month.
Seeing those numbers next to each other made me pause. It’s not that I was unhappy with Photoshop. I was just suddenly made aware how expensive it is. I’d been paying more for a single tool than I could for an entire creative ecosystem.
Creative Studio’s lower price point, along with the free trial, made me consider switching to Pixelmator Pro altogether. That’s something I never thought I would do. Photoshop was how I got into graphic design. It was my first love, and up until recently, I truly thought it would be my ride or die.
Getting to know Pixelmator Pro
If you’re not familiar, Apple’s Pixelmator Pro is a graphic design and image editing app that’s similar to Adobe Photoshop. In practice, it covers a huge amount of the same ground but with a very different philosophy around usability and design.
I tried Pixelmator Pro, mostly as a challenge because we were doing a YouTube video on Apple Creator Studio. Personally, I was lowkey excited to try something new.
The first time I loaded the app, I recreated our YouTube thumbnail template — all within 10 minutes — and I haven’t looked back since.
Familiar enough to feel effortless
One of the biggest reasons my transition to Pixelmator Pro was so easy is muscle memory. Many shortcuts behave the same way: cmd+T for transform, cmd+R to show rulers, cmd+J to duplicate layers, just to name a few.
Having used Photoshop since high school, it felt familiar and intuitive — the complete opposite of how it felt to try and switch to Adobe Illustrator many years ago.
Photoshop is how I got into graphic design. It was my first love, and up until recently, I truly thought it would be my ride or die.
Later, I learned that you can import PSD (Photoshop) files directly to Pixelmator Pro. Apparently I didn’t even need to recreate the GadgetMatch assets. It does a good job of converting and preserving layers.
Photoshop now feels archaic
After using Pixelmator Pro for a few days, going back to Photoshop felt jarring. The sharp edges of the UI felt cold and rigid. Everything was layered with popups, panels, and tiny interruptions.
Pixelmator Pro, in comparison feels warm, smooth and frictionless. Its user interface is very Apple-like — rounded edges, softer icons and buttons. The Creator Studio version also gets the new Liquid Design touch, with transparent menus and elements that feel dynamic.
I especially love the little things. Color adjustments live in one simple panel instead of being scattered across different windows. There’s an eyedropper tool beside every color picker with a magnifier built-in.
When you hover over tools, it shows you the shortcut (e.g. “R” for Repair). There are also subtle animations, like when you use the Color Fill tool to change your canvas color.
The differences in user experience are stark. Photoshop’s animations either don’t exist or are too abrupt for one to notice.
Smart tools without the noise
Photoshop has one clear advantage over Pixelmator Pro: Generative AI. It’s great and powerful especially when you need to save time.
I personally used it a couple of times before to save time on cloning, erasing, or expanding elements. Am I going to miss it with this switch? Something tells me I won’t.
Pixelmator Pro’s clone and repair tools, though seemingly so simple, work like a charm. And for how I usually manipulate images, those two are more than enough.
From digital to physical
If Pixelmator Pro was going to replace Photoshop in my workflow, wedding prep was the perfect time to give it a real world test — and it more than held its own. Its ease of use gave me permission to think outside the box, because I knew I had a reliable tool that can help me make it happen.
On the left, a Kufic-inspired wedding logo designed on Pixelmator Pro; on the right, 3D printed stamps
Since my fiancé is half-Iranian, I designed a logo combining our names, inspired by Kufic calligraphy, and I did it entirely in Pixelmator Pro. I developed that same logo further and designed a save the date, with color, also inspired by Kufic calligraphy. I went through a few iterations to come up with the final designs, which were made easier by the Shape tool and grid overlays.
My fiancé then took the logo I designed in Pixelmator Pro, converted it to 3D on Revit, and printed it into stamps in different sizes. One way we’re using it is to deboss the handmade pottery he’s making as one of our party favors.
There are a few more wedding pieces I’m designing on Pixelmator Pro in the coming weeks: our final invitation, and the custom stationery for the dinner that follows the ceremony.
Through this whole process, Pixelmator Pro never felt like it got in the way, or that it was limited. On the contrary, it feels like that enabler friend who says yes to every idea I have, and can actually help make them real.
Powerful, but approachable
The best way I can describe what using Pixelmator Pro is like is this: it’s a mix of Photoshop’s professional tools, Canva’s free library of assets, and Apple’s UI sensibility.
Shortly after Apple announced Creator Studio, Adobe rolled out significant Creative Cloud discounts. Are they threatened? They better be.
That makes it great for beginners, small business owners, and casual creators. Like Canva, it comes with some beautiful templates to help someone with zero experience come up with something good.
But unlike Canva, it still feels like a serious design tool. I can do so much of what I need using Pixelmator Pro but with UI that’s so much more approachable compared to Photoshop.
I remember meeting Canva’s founders before launch and not fully understanding their mission to make graphic design accessible to everyone. Now I do.
It was never about replacing Adobe products and pro designers. What Canva did was fill a huge void we didn’t know existed. They democratized something that used to be reserved only for the privileged few.
Pixelmator Pro comes with free templates, assets, and mockups like this MacBook Pro and coffee packaging
Pixelmator Pro’s lower barrier to entry has potential to make a significant impact. My hope is it opens doors for people who were previously shut out of the graphic design world, and that it becomes something they can grow with, just as I did with Photoshop.
Adobe is still the industry standard
Switching to Pixelmator Pro wasn’t about rejecting Adobe, in the same way that Canva’s success did not kill Photoshop.
It’s worth noting that Adobe products are still the standard in the industry. A lot of companies rely on them, and most schools teach them. In a traditional design or agency environment, Photoshop and Illustrator are still the default language.
Even on Apple’s own Design Resources site for developers, the official design templates are built for Adobe Photoshop and Illustrator, not Pixelmator Pro. That says a lot about how embedded Adobe is in professional workflows.
Competition makes the space better
Apple Creator Studio, and tools like Pixelmator Pro, challenge Adobe’s near-monopoly in a really healthy way.
It’s not lost on me that trading Photoshop with Apple software actually keeps me locked into one ecosystem. But having more pro creatives try Pixelmator Pro can put pressure on the industry. A strong alternative that’s more cost effective can force titans and dinosaurs to evolve in a way the likes of Corel was never able to do.
Ideally, that means better products and fairer pricing for everyone. Shortly after Apple announced Creator Studio, Adobe rolled out significant Creative Cloud discounts. Are they threatened? They better be.
Access matters, and at the end of the day, with a healthy competition in the market, it’s consumers that win. Canva is a great example of this. It made design tools accessible to those who aren’t professionals. It didn’t make everyone a great designer, just as a novice who tries Final Cut Pro today won’t become a pro video editor tomorrow. Design is still a craft you develop over time with practice.
Is Pixelmator Pro my GadgetMatch?
Photoshop still has its place. But for my everyday work, and occasional personal projects, Pixelmator Pro can do everything that I need to accomplish, at a fraction of the cost.
It feels faster, lighter, and more alive. Honestly learning my way around new software has been so enjoyable — so much so that I feel a renewed sense of eagerness to try other design software like Blender and Figma.
Pixelmator Pro never felt like it got in the way, or that it was limited. On the contrary, it feels like that enabler friend who says yes to every idea I have, and can actually help make them real.
Wedding planning and Apple Creator Studio didn’t just make me switch to a new software. They also made me question how much I’ve been missing out on. How much of what I do is simply due to inertia?
Ending my longest relationship doesn’t mean it failed. I’m grateful for what Photoshop taught me. It helped shape the creative professional that I am today.
But alas, this is one area where my practicality wins over loyalty. Relationships — with people or with tools — only work when both parties keep showing up. There’s no room for complacency, despite the history.
Walking away from something that taught me so much feels bittersweet, but Pixelmator Pro fits the way I work now, and I hope it grows with me as I turn the next page.
Apps
Apple Creator Studio: Creative apps bundled into single subscription
All the tools you need, one payment
Apple has officially streamlined its popular creative apps into one single subscription suite with the introduction of Apple Creator Studio.
The collection includes some of the most useful apps for today’s creators: Final Cut Pro, Logic Pro, Pixelmator Pro, Motion, Compressor, and MainStage.
New AI features and premium content in Keynote, Pages, and Numbers also make the Apple Creator Studio an exciting subscription suite. Freeform will eventually be added to the lineup.
The groundbreaking collection is designed to put studio-grade power into the hands of everyone. It builds on the essential role Apple devices play in the lives of millions of creators worldwide.
The apps included cover video editing, music making, creative imaging, and visual productivity to give modern creators the features and capabilities they need.
Final Cut Pro introduces exceptional new video editing tools and intelligent features for Mac and iPad.
For the first time, Pixelmator Pro is also coming to iPad with a uniquely crafted experience optimized for touch and Apple Pencil.
Logic Pro, meanwhile, for Mac and iPad introduces more intelligent features like Synth Player and Chord ID.
Apple Creator Studio will be available on the App Store beginning January 29. In the Philippines, the rates are PhP 399 a month or PhP 3,990 annually.
There is also a free one-month trial which includes access to:
- Final Cut Pro, Logic Pro, and Pixelmator Pro on Mac and iPad
- Motion, Compressor, and MainStage on Mac
- Intelligent features and premium content for Keynote, Pages, Numbers, and later Freeform for iPhone, iPad, and Mac
College students and educators can subscribe for a discounted price of PhP 149 per month or PhP 1,490 per year.
-
Accessories2 weeks agoApple AirTag 2 Review
-
First Look1 week agoMatch Pulse: Infinix NOTE 60 Pro
-
Cameras1 week agoOsmo Pocket 4 makes a surprising appearance in public
-
Camera Walkthrough7 days agoOPPO Reno15 Pro: Camera Review
-
Gaming2 weeks agoStar Wars: Galactic Racer shows off new gameplay at State of Play
-
News1 week agoiPhone 17 Pro Max is somehow the most traded-in phone today
-
Gaming1 week agoLG unveils UltraGear evo, redefines 5K gaming with AI Upscaling
-
News1 week agoHUAWEI launches Mate X7, MatePad 11.5 S 2026, FreeClip 2
