Lifestyle
People are using face swapping to make fake celebrity porn
And they can use it on you!
Artificial intelligence is back in the headlines. This time, it’s for all the wrong reasons. Face swapping technology has been transposing the faces of Hollywood celebrities into bodies of porn actresses.
The tech has been around for ages before it was used to create fake porn. Most notably, Star Wars standalone film Rogue One used the tech to recreate the deceased actor Peter Cushing as Grand Moff Tarkin. However, face swapping reached peak infamy a year later.
Last month, a Redditor named “deepfakes” gained massive notoriety when he or she used AI-powered face swapping to fulfill every teenage fantasy — creating porn videos of Hollywood celebs.
By using hundreds of photos from one celebrity, AI can create masks to replace the faces of lookalike porn actresses. When the trend started, it required a lot of processing power and technical know-how. However, in an instant, a follower of deepfakes simplified the process by creating an easy-to-use app (called FakeApp) that caters to even the amateur user.
Since then, the videos and GIFs (now called deepfakes after the founder) targeted celebs like Natalie Portman, Daisy Ridley, and Gal Gadot. The trend has even spawned a dedicated NSFW subreddit for projects and techniques. The subreddit contains a full tutorial on how to create your own videos.
Besides porn, internet users are also using the tech to create hilarious spoofs of movies. Particularly, Redditor derpfakes imagines an alternate reality where Nicolas Cage really was in Superman (but not as Superman).
It’s all fun and games, until you realize that this isn’t just about fulfilling Hollywood fantasies. Cyber rights advocates brood over the tech’s implications on non-celebrity porn, law, and fake news.
It’s only a matter of time before automated face swapping makes its way to the revenge porn industry — creating videos of an ex or a crush. Also, watch out for when ridiculous videos of hated politicians start popping up. The freaky future is nigh upon us.
Lifestyle
adidas’ hybrid training shoe gets a Solar Turbo makeover
Same hybrid-training tech, now in Solar Turbo / Lucid Pink~
adidas is giving the Adizero Dropset Pro a new look. Three months after the shoe first launched, the brand is rolling out a fresh colorway that keeps everything about the original build intact.
The Dropset Pro was built for hybrid athletes: the ones who run one day, hit the weight room the next, and throw in functional training somewhere in between.
adidas designed it to hold up across all three, and this newrefresh doesn’t touch that formula. What you’re getting is the same shoe in a much bolder shade.
A louder colorway
The new Solar Turbo / Lucid Pink colorway is hard to miss. adidas is positioning it as a style update on top of a shoe that already had its performance case made back in June.
The shoe still runs on full-length Lightstrike Pro foam, which adidas says handles cushioning and energy return without adding bulk.
EnergyRods are built into the midsole to help the foot roll through each stride. Lighttraxion covers the outsole for grip that doesn’t weigh the shoe down.
There’s Continental Rubber underneath for traction whether you’re training indoors or catching wet pavement outside. Also, there’s a 2.6mm Adizero sockliner that’s there to keep the shoe light while still giving you a feel for the ground under you.
Price, availability
If you’ve already got a pair of Dropset Pros in the original colorway, this isn’t a reason to upgrade. If you’ve been eyeing the shoe but wanted something less understated, this might be the version that gets you to check out.
The adidas Adizero Dropset Pro in Solar Turbo / Lucid Pink is available now at PhP 8,500. It’s in stock since September 2 at adidas and sports retail stores nationwide, on adidas.com.ph, and through the adidas App.
The National Basketball Association (NBA) and Salmon have announced a multi-year marketing partnership that makes the financial technology company an Official Partner of the NBA in the Philippines.
The announcement was made on August 29 at NBA House Philippines 2026 presented by Gatorade in Makati City. NBA Head of Southeast Asia and Asia Marketing Sheila Rasu, NBA Asia Head of Growth and Innovation Ed Winkle, and Salmon Co-Founders George Chesakov, Pavel Fedorov, and Raffy Montemayor attended the announcement.
Bringing NBA experiences closer to fans
Through the partnership, Salmon will engage basketball fans through NBA-themed consumer promotions, fan events, and NBA-branded premiums.
Salmon will also have a presence at major NBA events in the Philippines. This includes serving as a Supporting Partner of NBA House Philippines 2026, a free basketball experience and fan event at SPACE in One Ayala on August 29 and 30.
Starting with the 2026-27 season, Salmon will also become the Presenting Partner of the NBA 3X Philippines Open. The tournament features men’s and women’s 3-on-3 teams alongside NBA entertainment.
“Basketball is a part of our daily lives as Filipinos, from the courts in our barangays to the TV screens in our homes,” said Salmon Co-Founder Raffy Montemayor.
Montemayor said the company wants Salmon to become a reliable partner for Filipinos’ everyday money moments. He added that working with the NBA gives the brand a way to connect with Filipinos through something they already love.
Rasu said Salmon shares the NBA’s commitment to using basketball to bring Filipinos together. She added that the partnership will create new touchpoints for fans through events such as NBA House and the NBA 3X Open.
NBA continues its PH presence
Filipino fans can watch NBA games through One Sports, RPTV, NBA TV Philippines, Disney+, Pilipinas Live, Prime Video, and NBA League Pass through the NBA App. The league also maintains localized social media accounts on Facebook, TikTok, and X.
The partnership comes as the NBA continues to deepen its presence in the Philippines, one of the league’s major basketball markets.
Salmon is a financial technology brand in the Philippines owned by Salmon Group. Its local operations include Salmon Bank (Rural Bank) Inc., a BSP-regulated entity, and Salmon Finance Inc., an SEC-licensed financing company.
It’s easy to mistake The Dog Stars for a canine-centric survival tale if you aren’t familiar with the source material.
Peter Heller’s 2012 novel uses the title as a double meaning — referencing both the star Sirius within the Canis Major constellation (hence, “the Dog Star”) and the very real bond between a man and his dog.
In Ridley Scott’s cinematic adaptation, the premise delivers a grounded, post-pandemic world devastated by a global flu. The narrative is driven by a mysterious radio transmission intercepted by Jacob Elordi’s Hig, a quiet pilot pushed by grief and an irrepressible human curiosity to see what’s left of the world beyond his refuge.
With a stacked cast, a legendary director, and rich thematic material, general moviegoers and book fans alike have plenty of reason to expect a post-apocalyptic thriller.
Sadly, as an adaptation, The Dog Stars underwhelms. What promises to be an edge-of-your-seat survival ride settles into a surprisingly dull story that lacks the punch of a post-apocalyptic thriller.
It isn’t a bad film, but it struggles to balance its atmospheric build-up with a rushed, squandered third act.
⚠️ Warning: Some spoilers ahead! ⚠️
Ridley Scott’s signature touch
For what it’s worth, Scott doesn’t take long to make his visual presence felt. The director fills the screen with sweeping tracking shots of Hig’s Cessna plane gliding over vast mountain ranges.
This is juxtaposed with melancholic, muted sequences of his daily survival routine with Josh Brolin’s Bangley.
There is a sense of desolation; unaddressed grief for Hig’s late wife and the sheer fatigue of scavenging alongside his loyal Belgian Malinois, Jasper.
The quiet routine switches gears dramatically during action sequences. Scott brings dynamic flair to the screen. Notably, when Bangley holds off a horde of Reapers, the cinematography turns into a video game-esque, FPS-style night-vision POV shot.
Ditto with the high-stakes chase at Margaret Qualley’s Cima’s place, and during the final act in the trap that is Grand Junction.
Brolin and Pearce anchor the wasteland
What’s problematic here is that the lead supports, Josh Brolin and Guy Pearce, give the film its most grounded and reliable energy.
Fresh off playing a father searching for answers in Weapons, Brolin again slips effortless into his role of Bangley.
This badass survivalist with ex-Marine credentials complement Hig with a contrasting manner, making defending their abandoned airstrip look routine.
The initial friction between Hig and Bangley also drives the film’s early momentum. Bangley is perfectly content just chilling at the airstrip, while Hig is consumed by a curiosity to see what’s left on the other side of the horizon given the tools he has.
Bangley eventually concedes to Hig’s urge to chase the radio signal, but gets an earned “I told you so” moment near the end. This is fittingly a chef’s kiss to his character’s consistent demeanor.
Yet you don’t mistake Bangley’s isolation for passivity as well. He is practically itching for a reason to unleash a barnyard full of weapons (pun not intended) he’s been hoarding. It’s as if treating the invading Reapers like the ultimate survival battle he’s eagerly been waiting for in the post-pandemic world.
Complementing this heavy-duty presence is Guy Pearce’s Pops. His fiercely overprotective father persona to Cima steals the spotlight given how everyone is cherishing what’s (or who’s) left.
There are sharp one-liners aimed at keeping Hig at arm’s length, as he’s understandably paranoid after surviving the apocalypse.
Together, these are two highly enjoyable flavors of post-apocalyptic fatherhood. Eventually, Bangley warms up as the entire protagonist group relocates to integrate with the Mennonites in the end.
Pacing turbulence, squandered climax
The film’s momentum begins to stall in the second half. Once Hig crash-lands and meets Cima nad Pops, the narrative slows down considerably.
Sure, it’s a way to establish the emotional foundation and romantic spark between the couple for audiences unfamiliar with Heller’s novel. Perhaps, an attempt to balance the quiet character work with the surrounding chaos.
However, the scales still tip heavily toward sluggish pacing, with the film losing much of the earned tension. This turns what should have been a tense journey into a noticeably dull movie experience.
Quite ironically, this is where Elordi and Qualley’s acting shines the most. It doesn’t help that there is an exposition-heavy writing as you just wait for a climactic finale to unfold, yet it never quite materializes.
By the time the story finally moves to Grand Junction, what should have been a defining act feels like a rushed afterthought.
Given the creative independence, Grand Junction could have been executed like a harrowing, inescapable maze. More frustratingly, the film completely drops the ball on its most disturbing revelation.
When the group stumbles upon roomfuls of discarded passports and piles of dead bodies, it should have been a heart-stopping, horror-thriller pivot. It’s the ultimate “we are completely fucked” moment, exposing the radio signal as a trap rather than a beacon of hope.
Had the film leaned into this nightmare, it would have rolled out the red carpet for Scott to flash his brilliance even further, recalling the tight, claustrophobic dread he mastered in Alien.
Instead, the movie glances past it in a split second. The protagonists overpower the opposition far too easily, robbing the climax of any real danger or lingering tension.
Should you watch it?
Undeniably, The Dog Stars movie succeeds in grounding itself on the human side of post-pandemic survival.
This isn’t a high-octane, “suspend-your-disbelief” blockbuster stuffed with outrageous sci-fi gimmicks; it is a thoroughly logical, realistic look at how real people would handle isolation, grief, and the instinct to rebuild community after everything crumbles.
The film’s core ideas are sound, and its emotional logic is intact. Still, it simply lacks the sharp execution and narrative punch needed to elevate it into a masterpiece.
On our Watch Scale, it falls under Wait on streaming. There’s plenty of technical flair and solid performances from grizzled veterans, but the rushed finale and missed horror-thriller pivot leaves you wishing Scott had been allowed to unleash the full extent of his cinematic powers.
-
News2 weeks agorealme 16T 5G with 8000mAh battery, IP69 Pro rating launches in PH
-
News1 day agoHUAWEI Pura X View is 2026’s first WIDE slab-type smartphone
-
News2 weeks agoREDMI reveals the refreshed Note 17 and Note 17 Pro series
-
Singapore2 weeks agoREDMI Note 17 Series: Price, availability in Singapore
-
Cameras2 weeks agoInsta360 Luna Ultra review: My new solo coverage camera
-
Reviews2 weeks agoREDMI Note 17 Pro review: What a rollercoaster ride!
-
Features1 week agoThe designated photographer’s new favorite phone: OPPO Reno16 Series 5G
-
Cameras6 days agoDJI Osmo 360 II review: Going all-in on the ecosystem









