Aside from looking distractingly similar, the OnePlus 5 and OPPO R11 have a lot in common — this includes the same rear dual-camera setup. But, does this mean they have the same photo quality? Let’s find out which phone takes better photos.
I took to the streets to find out which of the two would be a better fit for my everyday gallivanting, an activity that entails a whole lot of picture taking.
In one corner, we have the OnePlus 5, a flagship killer that has proven to be the choice of conscientious, practical techies; in the other corner, the OPPO R11, the latest release from a company which touts itself as a selfie expert.
Admittedly, my type would better fit the latter category. It’s no secret that I like taking selfies, but less known is the fact that I enjoy taking photos of places I visit. In most of my wanderlust-fueled (mis)adventures, I usually attempt to document beautiful scenery with a smartphone — whether or not my face is in the frame.
I’d want a camera capable of taking the best-possible photo right then and there without needing to adjust whatever complicated settings there are. In the past, most OPPO phones have worked out well for my photo needs but OnePlus’ recent focus on cameras has my interest piqued.
For this shootout, a trip out of the city was in order, and I soon found myself in the mountain town of Jiufen, east of Taipei. It took us about an hour on the road to get there.
Captured below is the wonderful view from the old mining town. At around noon when this photo was taken, the sun shone brightly, overlooking the mountain. As opposed to the OnePlus 5’s photo, the OPPO R11’s output is more colorful, giving justice to the time I spent burning in the heat to take this particular shot.
Photos from the R11 seem to come out brighter, in general, though this sometimes washes out details. The photo below features each respective phone’s bokeh mode. Both look pretty accurate with the borders between the subject and background neatly delineated (I had issues with uneven background blur on an older OPPO phone).
A visit to the Taipei Zoo showcased both cameras’ quick focusing performance. This very active subject was not the easiest to photograph, especially behind those bars. But, neither smartphone flinched during the challenge. It was surprisingly easy to take photos of this big bird.
The next photo had no intentional significance — I was just being basic with an ice cream cone (Taipei summers are killer) — but then, I am again shown how the OPPO R11 has better overall color reproduction. The OnePlus 5 does have better HDR, but at the end of the day, I want to eat the ice cream cone in the R11’s photo more.
The busy streets of Taipei are always a source for colorful food adventures, and additionally, a good experiment for nighttime photography. Again, both smartphones were able to hold their ground with decent photographs.
Taipei is also home to many watering holes. A visit to one of these bars proved that despite dim lighting conditions (and a significant volume of alcohol consumed), photos come out non-hazy (unlike me). Though both photos turned out well, closer inspection would reveal that the OnePlus sample has better detail.
In the selfie arena — because front-facing cameras are my jam — both phones perform well in terms of photo quality. At the highest beauty mode setting, selfies turn out looking good without the filter becoming too overwhelming.
It’s noticeable that the OnePlus 5’s filters are more subtle even at this maximum setting. It should also be noted that there is very little difference between the two photos even when the OPPO phone boasts a higher camera resolution.
Getting the feel
If you’re an iPhone user, OPPO’s ColorOS camera interface will look very familiar. Although still Android, this heavily skinned OS looks and feels like an iPhone. The OnePlus 5, however, has a very simple interface, in true stock Android fashion.
Both smartphones have a normal photo mode with 2X zoom at a tap and portrait modes with automatic bokeh effect. Although both phones have a Pro shooting mode, only the OPPO R11’s is accessible via a swipe as you’d need to navigate through a menu to get to it on the OnePlus 5. But this rarely poses a problem for me because really, I don’t have to use this mode often.
Which is your GadgetMatch?
I had a hard time picking between the two. Both phones perform pretty well, even in difficult circumstances.
The OPPO R11’s brighter, more saturated photos make for ideal outdoor daylight photos. Overall, I just found photos shot from this phone more visually appealing. On the other hand, the OnePlus 5 has great photo detail and more pronounced contrast which lead to better nighttime shots.
For selfie photos, I’d call it a tie in terms of photo quality, but I still prefer the OPPO R11’s beauty mode as it has a wider range when it comes to the filter level applied.
All things considered, I’d pick the OPPO R11’s cameras over the OnePlus 5’s — but it won me over only by a small margin. Obviously, I’ve always been fascinated with these selfie smartphones which prioritize pretty, Instagrammable photo output above all, though this comparison has proven that a phone need not be labeled as such to be a strong shootout contender.
It must be pointed out, however, that even if the OPPO R11 came out on top for me, I’d still be happy shooting with a OnePlus 5 — and it’s not just because they look alike.
Samsung Galaxy S9 and S9+ vs Google Pixel 2: Camera Shootout
Shootout between the two highest-rated smartphone cameras
Aside from having the famed AR Emoji, Samsung’s Galaxy S9 and S9+ are earning praises and accolades for multiple features. Imaging authority DxOMark has even given the S9+ (or what I call the “jumbo” version) the highest smartphone camera rating to date.
Hot off the launch event, I got to take the S9, which is the smaller handset (I dub thee the “mini” version), out for a spin. The mini S9 supposedly has the same camera specs as the S9+ including that fancy dual-aperture feature, except, the latter has a rear dual-cam setup capable of real portrait mode shooting and zoom.
On this trip, I was packing the Google Pixel 2, which used to top DxOMark’s charts and is now second only to the S9+.
Being the curious person that I am, I took the S9 and the Pixel 2 out and around Barcelona to see just how the two compare. Here’s how that turned out.
It was unusually cold and rainy in Barcelona this year but I managed to take a number of snaps of the picturesque city.
Both phones did a great job on this shot. Overall lighting was good, even on the building facades considering these areas were against the light. The S9’s photo is noticeably brighter, but the Pixel 2 shot has more building details owing to high contrasts — something the phone is known for.
Same observations may be made with this set. Color and detail is more apparent on the Pixel photo owing to contrasts. The blue sky on the S9 photo looks more saturated while the Pixel 2 photo gives a deeper, darker sky.
These photos were taken inside famed apartment building Casa Batlló by Antoni Gaudí who is the genius behind Barcelona’s Sagrada Família.
The S9’s photo is brighter but this meant that color and some parts (notice the windows) have washed out details. Notice that the same photo is also more yellow. The deeper blues in the Pixel 2’s photo make for a better take.
Yet again, both photos come out well, and this is considering that this was an indoor setting. The S9 photo won this particular round, however. The brightness and color saturation just made the overall picture more appealing.
We now move on to the true smartphone camera challenges!
This photo came out with surprising results. I’m not quite sure why color differed vastly between the two pictures — might be the white balance, or the saturation — so your guess is as good as mine.
This outdoor night time shot proves that both are capable shooters (as if it isn’t obvious enough at this point), and both samples have great detail. As has been a recurring theme in these photos, the S9’s take is a little bit more saturated while the Pixel 2’s photo has more pronounced contrasts.
The S9 impressed massively in this photo. Although the stained glass windows aren’t as colorful in this sample, the S9 was able to brighten the photo so much so that the details on the ceiling are clearly seen. This was not the case with the Pixel 2 photo.
On to the part of the review that always makes me hungry.
The S9 and S9+ have a built in Food Mode specifically built for these type of shots.
As seen in the left-most photo, the tuna is definitely redder. Obviously, saturation has been upped on the S9’s Food Mode and there’s a blur effect going on — one that’s reminiscent of Instagram’s radial blur filter. The Pixel 2’s tuna looks paler and less appealing in general, even compared to the normal S9 shot.
The same goes with this yummy piece of salmon. Although undoubtedly very, very yummy, the Pixel 2’s photo looks least appealing. The S9 Food Mode, however, seemed a little too much for this naturally orange dish. The normal S9 photo looks just right (and now I want salmon).
This is where it gets interesting. The S9 houses a single rear camera which means its bokeh mode is all software; the Pixel 2 is the same. On the other hand, the S9+ (yes, the jumbo version) packs dual-rear shooters that can do real hardware bokeh with its adjustable Live Focus Mode. The results are below:
The Google Pixel 2 still does better software cut-outs, but the S9+ and its hardware bokeh are the true winners here.
Speaking of S9+ features, there’s also an optical zoom capability thanks to the second rear shooter on this jumbo phone while the Pixel 2’s single shooter doesn’t have the same thing, so we give this round to the S9+.
Of course, the S9 and S9+ have a very detailed beauty and makeup mode (something I’ve thoroughly explored in this video) — a feature the Pixel 2 doesn’t have.
On the selfie front, here’s how the phones fared:
The S9’s photo is brighter and softer — a look I’ve noticed women are more prone to liking in their selfies as it gives faces a softer look. As expected, the Pixel 2’s high contrasts give off a much sharper look; notice the seemingly overdrawn eyebrows on the Pixel 2 sample compared to the S9’s.
The verdict is not surprising: All these phones are very, very capable shooters. As to which phone is better would depend on preference. Admittedly, the S9+ would be the best overall shooter with the added camera and shooting features. The S9, on the other hand, is a great choice if you like brighter, more saturated photos in a smaller body. And despite being released months prior, the Pixel 2 is still on par with these fresh releases. It’s still a great choice if you’re fond of great contrasts and faithful color reproduction.
Which one of these phones won you over?
OnePlus 5T vs OPPO R11s: Camera Shootout
Which phone has the better cameras?
We are here, yet again. Months after the release of the OnePlus 5T and OPPO R11s, we are left scratching our heads at how much these two phones from supposedly different companies look so alike.
Of course, this isn’t the first time, this happened. These two phones’ predecessors, the OnePlus 5 and OPPO R11, also looked confusingly similar.
And so, I had to ask: Despite looking like absolute twinsies, how do the phones’ cameras perform against each other?
Both phones are equipped with dual-rear cameras: A 16- and 20-megapixel combo. Both phones have ditched using their secondary cameras for optical zoom capabilities and instead champion having two shooters with f/1.7 apertures — to shoot better in low-light situations, they claim.
It’s on the front-facing cameras where these two phones differ. The OnePlus 5T sports a 16-megapixel camera with an aperture of f/2.0 while the OPPO R11s is fitted with a 20-megapixel camera with the same f/2.0 aperture.
Now, on to the shootout!
At first glance, there doesn’t seem to be a big difference between the two phones in terms of rear camera performance. In great lighting conditions, the OnePlus 5T and the OPPO R11s deliver great color and detailed photos.
As I used the two phones more, however, I noticed a slight difference with the photos they produce.
In very bright or extreme lighting conditions, the OnePlus 5T’s photos had higher contrast while the R11s’ photos were usually brighter in terms of exposure.
With HDR on, the OnePlus 5T did slightly better. This handset was better at balancing the bright sky background and the shadowy flower foreground. The flowers on the R11s sample were visibly darker and less detailed.
Colors come out almost the same — bright and punchy, but not too saturated as other smartphone cameras have been known to do. But, notice that the R11s’ shot is a tad warmer than the 5T’s photo.
This warmth on the R11s photos is more apparent in the photo above. Again, OPPO’s photos are more exposed, though in this case, that led to a lack of detail on this particular photo.
That R11s brightness works for some instances, however. In the pictures above, the brightness on the OPPO R11s photo worked as it made for a more vivid photo of the flowers.
In low-light settings, both devices do good, though we’ve seen other handsets perform better. Colors are brighter and more solid on the OnePlus 5T; its contrast settings work better for scenarios like this.
The OnePlus 5T and the OPPO R11s both have portrait modes on their rear cameras. For the unfamiliar, this shooting mode just allows for a bokeh effect and slight face-filtering that ensures optimum photos.
On this mode, both devices did well. Bokeh cutouts looked good and natural. As expected and as observed from the other photos, the R11s had a higher exposure which meant less shadows on the face. There was also more airbrushing on the R11s photo with Joshua’s (the photo subject) freckles almost disappearing completely.
There’s also an extra setting on the R11s’ rear camera portrait mode that allows for a tighter portrait shot — I call this the “bust” or “full body” button. Toggling this will either crop into the photo like above, or give you a wider shot like the photo before that.
The same observations are applicable to this next portrait photo. Notice how smooth my skin is on the R11s picture — even golden hour’s great lighting wouldn’t have been able to get my skin to look that great!
Now on to selfies!
This first selfie batch was taken with the beauty mode turned off.
Look closer and you’ll notice subtle differences. The R11s’ photo exposure make it seem like my face is brighter, and even without beauty mode, there seems to be subtle airbrushing done on my face. On both photos, you see the detail on my skin, though I’d say that the OnePlus 5T photo is more true to life — not that I’m happy about that fact.
It should be noted, though, that there is no bokeh mode available on the OnePlus 5T’s front-facing cameras. Alas, you have to deal with crappy backgrounds when you’re on this phone as you can’t blur them out.
It’s really on the beauty mode that these two phones differ. The OnePlus 5T does have a beauty mode contolled by a bar that you can toggle for intensity. The OPPO R11s, on the other hand, has beauty mode settings with choices from intensities one to six, and artificial intelligence-powered beauty mode when set to “Auto.”
The OnePlus 5T’s beauty mode is noticeably mild compared to the R11s’. Even on the highest setting, OnePlus’ filters weren’t as strong as some of OPPO’s. Although OPPO’s filters run the risk of too much smoothing and plastic-y skin, the improved AI-beauty mode has me impressed with natural-looking selfie results.
Even in group selfies, the same results carry over. Again, there is no bokeh or portrait mode on the OnePlus 5T’s selfie camera, which is a shame especially for group photos like above.
The OnePlus 5T, slapped with a flagship processor, is aimed at power users who look at utility and value for money as primary priorities. Even this phone’s lack of portrait or bokeh mode on the front-facing camera, if it’s any indication, shows how selfies just aren’t a priority on this device.
The OPPO R11s, on the other hand, sticks to the brand’s selfie roots. It caters to an audience that puts importance on selfies and beauty modes, even going as far as installing artificial intelligence on said beauty mode.
To be completely honest, there isn’t much of a difference in terms of picture quality between these two handsets. It all boils down to preference. Unless you’re very particular about your beauty modes, either phone would work for you.
In this particular case, the cameras aren’t a tie-breaker.
GoPro HERO 6 Black vs HERO 5 Black Comparison
Which is the action camera for you?
GoPro is one of the biggest names in sports videography and is a name that first comes to mind when the need for a portable, easy-to-set-up camera arises. Although, the past couple of years were a bit hard for the company as sales plummeted, and after introducing their first-ever drone, some literally fell from the sky.
Still working hard on making another hit, GoPro has returned with their latest action camera, the HERO 6 Black, and it boasts some pretty impressive features. Will it be the saving grace the company needs right now? How does it fare compared to its predecessor, the HERO 5? We answer those questions plus more in this comparison.
On the outside, nothing has changed with the new action camera at all. It’s made of the same robust, rubbery material that’s designed to go underwater for as deep as 10 meters without needing an extra waterproof case. Button placements are carried over — one up top to start recording and another one on its side to switch between shooting modes.
Underneath, the same 1220mAh battery is stored while connectivity ports are on the other side. Even the protective lens is still removable and replaceable. There’s virtually no way of telling the two apart except for the small print on the side of the camera.
The biggest upgrade of the HERO 6 has more to do with output. It can now shoot up to 4K resolution at 60fps, whereas the previous HERO 5 topped out at 4K 30fps. It might seem like a small detail but having the option to shoot smoother video is always a good thing.
Another difference is frame rate. The HERO 5 Black can capture videos at a speedy 240fps but resolution is limited to 720p. The newer HERO 6 Black, on the other hand, can shoot the same 240fps rate at a clearer 1080p resolution.
For more flexibility, the HERO 6 can also shoot at 2.7K at 120fps so you get nice slow-mo video with the ability to resize or re-scale your footage if the need arises. Other features that differentiate the new action camera from its predecessor include better low-light performance and dynamic range.
Of course, all this means nothing if we can’t see for ourselves. I brought both cameras during my travels and you may refer to the embedded video below (starting at 2:46) for some sample video comparisons.
You can easily see that the sky from the HERO 6’s shots is more vibrant than the pale blue color from the HERO 5. There’s also a noticeable difference in exposure. The HERO 5 has darker blacks which, in this case, worked well since it was able to bring out more details on the snowy mountain.
Although both are set to auto white balance, footage from the HERO 5 still turns out to be warmer as seen in the indoor shoot.
In terms of stabilization, the new HERO 6 really stepped up its game to remove unwanted jerks and jitters. The difference is day and night, and it’s impressive how the HERO 6 almost looks like it was mounted on a gimbal thanks to its electronic image stabilization.
Don’t get us wrong, the HERO 5 also has its own EIS, but just not as good as the new flagship’s.
One more thing to notice when the camera’s EIS is turned on is that the HERO 5 needs to crop the image by 10 percent to achieve a smoother shot, while the HERO 6 has improved this and only crops about 5 percent of the original image.
Additionally, stabilization on the HERO 5 can only be used until 2.7K resolution at 60fps, while the HERO 6 supports stabilization until 4K. The only limitation here is that EIS maxes out at 30fps with no support for the higher 60fps.
Onto low-light shooting: Footage taken with the older HERO 5 couldn’t achieve the same level of clarity shot on the HERO 6. Colors are also livelier and digital noise has been reduced significantly on the latter.
Although there were instances, like when we went ice skating, that we preferred the color and details shot by the HERO 5. It looked more natural and the ice on the floor is still visible, unlike the one shot by the HERO 6.
We now look at some photo samples from both action cameras.
This photo was taken at Italy’s oldest shopping mall and shows a good balance between light and dark areas. We like how the HERO 5 has a higher contrast which added detail to the metal structure of the mall.
While waiting for a train, we see the sun lighting the Swiss Alps from behind with a dark and shaded station in the foreground. Again, we see a more vibrant blue sky from the HERO 6 with good details.
But look closer on the warning sign in front of you and the HERO 5 was actually able to deliver a better, more legible image. Even when you crop them to 100 percent, the smallest details seem to appear better on the HERO 5.
At night, both proved to be capable shooters, but the HERO 6 showed more details by effectively capturing the cracks on the floor. One thing that I had been complaining about with my HERO 5 is that it easily overshoots light flares, creating an unwanted glow and losing details.
It’s very much distracting here since it washed out the person’s face. Meanwhile, we’re happy that it was addressed on the HERO 6 as it’s clearly the better photo.
Zooming in to 100 percent shows that the green motorcycle has a livelier color and less noise on the HERO 6 compared to its predecessor. Here are more sample photos:
As mentioned earlier in this video, the HERO 6 Black carries the same 1220mAh battery capacity as the HERO 5 Black. So it should technically last for the same amount of time right? Well, no.
We conducted a battery test on the two at full capacities, same video settings, and started recording until they both drained their batteries. After more than an hour and a half, the HERO 6 actually gave up first at 1 hour and 42 minutes while the HERO 5 continued on and reached 2 hours and 5 minutes. That’s 23 minutes of difference and could go a long way in real-world shooting.
Responsible for this result might be the HERO 6’s newer custom processor. Yes, it could produce better dynamic range, low light shots, and stabilize the camera really well — but at the cost of a more power-hungry chip. That’s definitely a trade-off to consider.
So the question here is this: Should you upgrade to a HERO 6 Black from a HERO 5 Black?
Well, you first have to ask yourself the question: Will you be using it to shoot serious action scenes with really fast movement? Are you after the best quality there is? Or are you more of a casual user who just uses a sports camera to document your out-of-town trips?
Because if it’s not for professional work, the HERO 5 Black is more than capable to document all your trips. It’s also worth every penny since it just dropped its price to US$ 299, making it a really attractive offering — not to mention longer battery life.
Although if you plan to use your action videos for broadcast and want to have a lot of flexibility in shooting and editing, then you can’t go wrong with the HERO 6 Black at US$ 399.
Samsung Galaxy S9 Review
Are these new features worth the price increase?
Samsung Galaxy S9: An honest review of AR Emoji and more
Find a phone that gives you both
Samsung Galaxy S9 Review: Brilliant but underwhelming
Brilliant but underwhelming
Huawei P20 Lite leaks in full unboxing video
Vivo V9 will launch on March 22 in the Philippines
Cebu billboard hints that Amazon is coming to the Philippines
Samsung Galaxy S9 Unboxing with Georgina Wilson
Shadow of the Tomb Raider will be out soon
Best Budget Smartphones in the Philippines below P10,000
ASUS officially announces ZenFone 5 and 5Z powered by AI
Best Premium Smartphones in the Philippines above P30,000
OnePlus destroys Apple and Samsung phones in latest advertisement
Best Midrange Smartphones in the Philippines from P10,000 to P20,000
News2 weeks ago
ASUS ZenFone 5 Lite to be called ZenFone 5Q in the Philippines
Reviews1 week ago
Samsung Galaxy S9 Review: Brilliant but underwhelming
Gaming2 weeks ago
Asphalt 9: Legends now available on iOS, coming soon to Android
Camera Shootouts1 week ago
Samsung Galaxy S9 and S9+ vs Google Pixel 2: Camera Shootout
News2 weeks ago
11,000 people lined up for $50 iPhones and discounted Apple products
Features2 days ago
6 Best Gaming Smartphones (Q1 2018)
Reviews2 weeks ago
Meizu M6s Review: A refreshing sight among budget options
India2 days ago
Vivo V9 goes live on official website before launch