Camera Shootouts

$200 Phone vs $850 Phone: Camera Shootout

Published

on

When it comes to camera shootouts, we’ve always compared phones of equal value. Let’s try something different this time.

Because of the way we pick each smartphone, comparisons often turned out barely distinguishable or too close to call, which made us wonder: What would happen if we pitted the most expensive phone in our office with the cheapest one?

The chosen two are Samsung’s US$ 850 Galaxy S8+ and Vivo’s US$ 200 V5 Lite — excellent handsets in their own right, but worlds apart when compared spec for spec, dollar for dollar.

The Galaxy S8+ has the most advanced single-camera to date, beating the Google Pixel and Apple iPhone 7 Plus in their respective shootouts. The Vivo V5 Lite has none of Sammy’s cool features and settles for simple rear and front-facing shooters, although it did well against the more expensive Moto M.

To make things interesting, we’re turning this into a blind test. Take note that Photo A in one round might not have been taken by the same phone that shot Photo A in another round; the same goes for Photo B samples.

As usual, all settings are set at Auto with HDR turned off and no editing or filters applied. For better pixel peeping, view this page on a monitor — a calibrated one if possible.

#1

#2

#3

#4

#5

#6

#7

#8

#9

#10

#11

#12

#13

#14

Now, it’s time to reveal which phone shot what.

#1: V5 Lite (A) vs Galaxy S8+ (B)

#2: V5 Lite (A) vs Galaxy S8+ (B)

#3: Galaxy S8+ (A) vs V5 Lite (B)

#4: Galaxy S8+ (A) vs V5 Lite (B)

#5: Galaxy S8+ (A) vs V5 Lite (B)

#6: V5 Lite (A) vs Galaxy S8+ (B)

#7: V5 Lite (A) vs Galaxy S8+ (B)

#8: Galaxy S8+ (A) vs V5 Lite (B)

#9: V5 Lite (A) vs Galaxy S8+ (B)

#10: Galaxy S8+ (A) vs V5 Lite (B)

#11: V5 Lite (A) vs Galaxy S8+ (B)

#12: V5 Lite (A) vs Galaxy S8+ (B)

#13: V5 Lite (A) vs Galaxy S8+ (B)

#14: Galaxy S8+ (A) vs V5 Lite (B)

We were honestly surprised by how close some comparisons turned out to be, especially for daytime scenes. It was only with selfies and macro shots that one was more favorable, that being the Galaxy S8+.

So, what did we learn from this experiment? We’d say flagship handsets continue to own the best cameras, but improvements have been in minor increments through the years. Lower-end phones have been making bigger strides in the imaging department, and have reached a point where they’re now comparable to the very best.

What do you think? Would you say this was a close fight or a shootout not worth doing again? Let us know in the comments section.

SEE ALSO: Samsung Galaxy S8 vs Apple iPhone 7 Plus: Camera Shootout

[irp posts=”12065″ name=”Samsung Galaxy S8 vs Apple iPhone 7 Plus: Camera Shootout”]

Camera Shootouts

Samsung Galaxy S20+ vs OPPO Find X2 Pro: Camera shootout

Which one shoots better for you?

Published

on

OPPO just came out with what arguably is their best phone to date — the Find X2 Pro. So we decided to take the phone out for a camera shootout against the Samsung Galaxy S20+ — arguably one of the best phones to come out so far in 2020.

Can the OPPO give Samsung a run for its money? Let’s find out!

Make sure to jot down your answers, as the results of this blind test will be at the end of this article. As usual, photos were labeled, resized, and collaged (this time) for you to load the images faster. No post-processing nor any color adjustments were done in any of the photos. So, let’s begin!

#1

#2

#3

#4

#5

#6

#7

#8

#9

#10

#11

Results

So, I’m just messing with you guys. It’s not actually a blind test since all photos labeled Photo A were taken using the OPPO Find X2 Pro. Meanwhile, all photos labeled Photo B were taken using the Samsung Galaxy S20+.

If you analyzed the photos, the Find X2 Pro clearly holds out on its own. In certain lighting conditions, the Find X2 Pro produced brighter and more saturated photos during the daytime. At night, it tends to illuminate the scene captured, and process it with a warmer tone.

On the other hand, the Galaxy S20+ produced balanced results, although vibrancy and contrast were strengthened in both day and night shots.

The most notable differences are how the Galaxy S20+ has subtle bokeh — making it more believable — and wider scope on its wide-angle mode, while the Find X2 Pro has a softer look whilst retaining details. Both phones were astounding and as always, everything will depend on a user’s preference and how they use their smartphone’s cameras.

How about its selfie camera?

While the Find X2 Pro goes toe-to-toe with the Galaxy S20+ on the rear camera department, its front camera samples look way different. The Find X2 Pro has a greener tint and warmer tone, while the Galaxy S20+ has a better white balance, but adds a pinkish tint.

Both phones upped their contrast and colors, adding an unnecessary beautification when processed despite not using beauty mode. The backlit selfies were captured properly, illuminating Michael Josh‘s face without compromising details. You just have to choose how you’ll post-process your selfies later on if you’re planning to upload it on social media.

Author’s opinion

Personally, both phones captured awesome photos. Even I had a hard time choosing between the two when putting this article together. Smartphones, particularly the best ones, capture outstanding results which makes it difficult for consumers to decide, especially when they’re concerned with the camera performance.

The key is to figure out how you’ll use the cameras. For instance, I’ll use the OPPO Find X2 Pro to capture more of my daily life — which I can readily upload to my social media platforms. The Galaxy S20+ proves handy though for frequent travelers, especially with its wide-angle lens.

Nonetheless, whatever you choose, know that you’re in good hands. Just don’t forget, there’s more to a smartphone than its cameras. Watch our YouTube videos for the Galaxy S20+ and Find X2 Pro to know more about these flagship devices.

Continue Reading

Camera Shootouts

Realme XT vs Samsung Galaxy A71: Camera shootout

64-megapixel camera battle!

Published

on

Nowadays, midrange smartphones pack a punch in the camera department. Sporting 64-megapixel cameras, one can’t help but wonder which smartphone takes better photos. Here, we compared the Realme XT (PhP 16,990/ US$ 333) and Samsung Galaxy A71 (PhP 22,990/ US$ 450) with a PhP 6,000/ US$ 118 difference.

Just like all of our camera shootouts, no edits were done except resizing for faster preview and watermark to quickly identify the shot.

Which smartphone do you think will win? Let’s have a 64-megapixel camera battle!

#1

#2

#3

#4

#5

#6

#7

#8

#9

#10

Analysis

We all know the Realme XT and Samsung Galaxy A71 produce 64-megapixel photos through pixel-binned 16-megapixel shots.

If you analyze the differences, the Realme XT has a red tint, but it produces an accurate color reproduction albeit a little bright and washed out.

On the other hand, the Samsung Galaxy A71 is a bit processed. It’s saturated yet lively, comprised of better contrasts and deeper blacks, but comes with a greener tint. Furthermore, its exposure is a hit or miss, and on most occasions, it produces bad highlights.

Since the photos were downsized for faster loading, we’ve compiled the original, high-resolution photos in respective Google Drive links: Realme XT | Samsung Galaxy A71.

Verdict

At the end of the day, both smartphones produce decent 64-megapixel shots, especially for the price it commands. However, it makes us wonder: Do we really need higher megapixels? Maybe we do, but maybe we also don’t.

For now, we can enjoy every smartphone’s attempt to make better images. After all, it’s us who benefit the most. So, which 64-megapixel camera phone shoots better for you? Let us know and share your thoughts with us on our social channels!

Continue Reading

Camera Shootouts

Huawei Mate 30 Pro vs Y9 Prime (2019): Camera shootout

Do you really need an expensive phone for your photos?

Published

on

By

We all know Huawei phones are recognized for their superior camera quality. In this camera shootout, we decided to test the camera prowess (and differences) between a SG$1300 flagship phone over a SG$340 midrange smartphone.

The Mate 30 Pro reigns in the smartphone camera department. Meanwhile, the Y9 Prime (2019) is one of the affordable midrangers out there. Although the Mate 30 Pro has an extra telephoto lens, we just decided to exclude the zoom mode and use only the ultra-wide and wide lenses when shooting. Other than that, the Mate 30 Pro has a 3D ToF (Time of Flight) camera while the other one has a depth sensor.

Without further ado, let’s dive in!

#1 Greenery

#2 Food (AI Mode)

#3 Saturation

#4 Wide-angle (Daylight)

#5 Ultra-wide angle (Daylight)

#6 Ultra-wide angle (Backlight)

#7 Selfie (Auto)

#8 Food (Low-light)

#9 Low-light (Auto)

#10 Low-light (Night Mode)

#11 Dawn (Night Mode)

#12 Night Mode

#13 Night Mode

#14 Fireworks (Auto Mode)

Results

A – Huawei Y9 Prime (2019) 

B – Huawei Mate 30 Pro 

After seeing the side-by-side comparison, we can all tell that the Mate 30 Pro stands out most especially when the photos were taken in a dark environment. But in well-lit situations, the Y9 Prime (2019) was able to deliver quality shots just like the Mate.

One thing I didn’t like on either phones are the selfies, especially when Beauty Mode was turned off.  But I guess that all boils down to personal preferences. Other than that, the Y9 Prime produces less saturated photos but it’s actually more accurate since it’s what I saw in real life. Except for the strawberry photo that looked too desaturated.

This further proves that cheaper smartphones can still deliver decent-looking photos. But in the case of the Mate 30 Pro, you’ll get more camera features (such as telephoto lens) because you paid more.

SEE ALSO: Huawei Mate 30 Pro vs iPhone 11 Pro Max: Camera shootout

Continue Reading

Trending