Globe beats Smart in 4G availability, loses in overall download speed



OpenSignal released its September 2017 report for mobile data speeds and 4G LTE availability in the Philippines for both Globe Telecom and Smart Communications. The results favor one side a little more.

This is the second time the independent group tracked data in the Philippines, recording three months’ worth of data from May 1 to July 31 for the two major network carriers. The data is largely the same as what was previously recorded, but it still gives us a good idea of which company does mobile data better.

There are a lot of numbers to look at, so we compiled them in a series of graphics. Take a look:

The first one represents 4G availability throughout the nation. OpenSignal measures this by looking at how often users can access the network, and not by how many areas have 4G connectivity. Globe has a significant edge here with 62.59 percent, which is nearly 10 percent more than Smart’s 52.71 percent.

The next piece of data shows average 4G download speeds for both providers in the Philippines. Smart has a much better speed of 10.55Mbps here; that’s over 3Mbps faster than Globe’s average speed!

While not as advanced, 3G is still important in rural areas without access to 4G. Luckily, users of both sides experience the network at virtually equal speeds.

With that, the overall download speed when you consider both 4G and 3G networks favors Smart. OpenSignal also factors in 4G availability, which Globe won earlier, but it isn’t enough to help the blue side catch up.

Latency signifies the delay data goes through when traveling from one point to another in a network. In this case, a lower number results in faster response, and Smart wins by a hair with an average 4G latency of 57.57ms compared to Globe’s 69.03ms.

As for 3G latency, it’s another virtual draw. But do note that the delay here is much longer than the 4G latency numbers shown earlier. This goes to show how much better it is to connect to the more advanced technology for a more fluid experience.

As you can see, there are a couple of ties, but the majority of wins go to Smart. The sole success for Globe is in 4G availability, which, if you think about it, may actually be the most important factor in terms of long-term statistics.

The data was recorded from over a billion measurements across 62,502 devices. Although these numbers are considered to be a fairly accurate representation of the state of mobile data in the Philippines, individual usage varies greatly and doesn’t necessarily equal to what we see here.

SEE ALSO: Smartphone Price Lists in the Philippines

[irp posts=”17683″ name=”Smartphone Price Lists in the Philippines”]

Source: OpenSignal


Huawei Mate 20 Pro Hands-on: Best phone of 2018?

Huawei outdoes itself again



In an industry where incremental updates are the new norm, Huawei manages to wow us again — barely a year after the release of the P20 Pro. The Chinese company is back with the Mate 20 and Mate 20 Pro which might just be the best among the best this year.

In this video, we go over the phones’ new designs, updated cameras, and new memory card format. We also go through the differences between the Huawei Mate 20 and Mate 20 Pro.

Continue Reading


Huawei Mate 20 vs Mate 20 Pro: What are the differences?

Price isn’t the only factor



Huawei has once again launched two flagships phones at the same time; one comes with a Pro moniker, while the other does not. Like before, there are some significant differences between the Mate 20 pair to take note of.

While we wait to get our hands on the Porsche Design Mate 20 RS and Mate 20 X, here are the two phones we already know everything about.


One obvious difference is in their displays. While the Mate 20 Pro goes for a notched 6.39-inch 1440p curved HDR OLED display — certainly a mouthful — the regular Mate 20 has a 6.53-inch 1080p RGBW HDR LCD with a much smaller notch.

The Pro model justifies the larger notch by housing a more complex camera system for secured facial recognition, but if that doesn’t matter to you, the regular variant’s Dew Drop notch may be more appealing — and definitely less intrusive.

In addition, the Mate 20 Pro’s OLED tech allows it to curve the edges and equip an in-display fingerprint scanner. It’s essentially the more modern-looking design of the pair.


Since both models have Huawei’s Kirin 980 chipset installed, pure performance is virtually identical. The Pro and non-Pro also share the same memory and storage configuration of 6GB and 128GB, respectively, although the plain Mate 20 has a more affordable 4GB memory variant available, too.

Another minor difference: The 4200mAh capacity of the Mate 20 Pro, along with the more energy-efficient OLED, provides it with potentially longer battery life than what the Mate 20’s 4000mAh capacity and LCD panel offer.

A more significant advantage for the Mate 20 Pro is its inclusion of a 40W SuperCharge adapter in the package — noticeably better than the 22.5W output of the Mate 20’s. Plus, the Pro version can charge other phones wirelessly using wireless reverse charging tech.


Perhaps, you’ll care most about the difference in camera quality and performance. While it’s too early to make photo and video comparisons, an initial look at specs shows that the Mate 20 Pro may have an edge.

There are three modules in place for the Pro: One is a 40-megapixel main camera, another has 20 megapixels and an ultra-wide lens, and the final unit offers 8 megapixels with 3x optical zoom

As for the Mate 20, its main camera has only 12 megapixels, the ultra-wide shooter settles for 16 megapixels, and the 8-megapixel telephoto camera goes up to only 2x optical zoom.

Despite the larger notch of the Mate 20 Pro, they share the same 24-megapixel selfie camera.

Pricing and colors

This part largely depends on where you reside, but in an ideal setting, all five colors — Emerald Green, Midnight Blue, Twilight, Pink Gold, and Black — should be available for both models.

Pricing is another matter, and it again depends per region. In Europe, the Mate 20’s 4GB+128GB configuration retails for EUR 799 and its 6GB+128GB model goes for EUR 849. The Mate 20 Pro’s sole 6GB+128GB variant costs EUR 1,049, making it more expensive by EUR 250 and EUR 200, respectively.

In Singapore, the Mate 20’s 6GB+128GB setup retails for SG$ 998, while the Mate 20 Pro is at SG$ 1,348 — a difference of SG$ 350.

Continue Reading


Huawei Mate 20 series first to have Nano Memory Card

Could this become a trend?



Aside from introducing a host of flagship features to the freshly minted Mate 20 series, Huawei also introduced a new memory card standard, simply named Nano Memory Card.

It’s available on both the Mate 20 and Mate 20 Pro, and it effectively replaces the microSD slot we’ve become so accustomed to. The question is: What’s so special about it?

The simplest answer is that it has the same size as the nano-SIM card inside any smartphone today. Because of the identical dimensions, the secondary card slot doesn’t have to be designed differently, like what has been done for microSD cards.

In the case of the Mate 20 series, the removable card tray has back-to-back slots: one for the nano-SIM, and the other for either another nano-SIM or separate Nano Memory Card.

As of writing, Huawei will be offering 128GB and 256GB NM Cards, with speeds of up to 90MB/s. They’re hoping it’ll become the new standard, and are producing adapters for additional compatibility.

It’s certainly a more efficient way of adding physical storage to a handset, and allows manufactures like Huawei to use the saved space for other features, like a large battery.

Looking ahead, it seems only logical for other smartphone brands to follow suit, but that would mean consumers would have to buy into a whole new standard and let go of their microSD cards.

The same thing happened with the introduction of the USB-C port, wherein users had to replace their micro-USB cables for the newer, more intuitive system. It’s been a gradual process, but definitely rewarding.

It’ll take a while before we find out if this will become a trend, but for now, we should appreciate Huawei’s courage in taking the first, big step.

Continue Reading