Entertainment
Superman is the jumpstart that DCU desperately needed
Even if the story could use a bit more fleshing out
Growing up, I never thought much about Superman. To me, his plain Boy Scout image made him much less badass than the quip-throwing Spider-Man or the ring-wielding Green Lantern. Of course, decades since his rise as the world’s first archetypal superhero, Superman can now bounce between different themes, including being cast as a messianic figure or as an allegory for immigration.
James Gunn’s Superman doesn’t reinvent the wheel, but it does tap a different well. His version of the superhero goes beyond the stereotypical good boy or the over-philosophized coming of God. It’s a refreshing take but not without its imperfections.
Superman is not an origin story.
As was evident from the film’s world tour, Superman does not want to retell the same origin story. We won’t see baby Kal-El crash in Kansas or watch his troubled upbringing as a superpowered teenage boy.
Instead, Gunn wants a bolder approach where everything is already set up from the beginning. The film starts with Superman (David Corenswet) already being a fixture in Metropolis, with Lois Lane (Rachel Brosnahan) already dating Clark Kent, and with Lex Luthor (Nicholas Hoult) already hating Superman. More specifically, the film starts with Superman already defeated.
Outsmarting Superman, Luthor infiltrates the Fortress of Solitude and acquires the corrupted message that Kal-El’s parents sent with him prior to the destruction of Krypton. Luthor restores the message’s entirety with his own technology and discovers that Superman’s mission is much less benevolent than anyone, including the hero himself, thought. And so begins Superman’s quest to discover who he truly is and what he can become.
Underneath all this is the question of what superheroes should do. The world questions Superman’s interventionist intentions after he prevents Boravia (a country that definitely, positively, surely isn’t an analog for Russia) from invading Jarhanpur, a militarily weaker nation.
Whereas the Marvel Cinematic Universe and DC’s previous iterations waited years to tackle the problem of superheroes in the world, the DCU is dropping audiences right in the thick of things.
Superman is an immigrant story.
With this premise, the film can easily rehash Zack Snyder’s old vision of turning Superman into a benevolent god figure destined to rule over mankind. But Gunn doesn’t.
Superman in this film is portrayed as an immigrant finding his place in an Americanized world. The hatred he faces is intense and unfortunately timely. Luthor often calls him as “the alien” and an “it”. Once the truth of his parents’ message comes out, the government turns on him and asks for his arrest.
The plot’s eerie similarities with what’s going on in the real world isn’t lost in translation. It’s a take that finally embraces Superman’s side as an immigrant in America.
Unfortunately, Superman’s qualities as an immigrant loses some of its appeal because of what the film takes as already given: the Kents, Lois’s love, Lex’s hate. Superman says that, despite what people think of him, he’s capable of love, of doing good. It’s a statement that’s a bit hard to swallow when we hardly see Clark and Lois dating or Clark spending quality time with his parents.
Gunn’s bold decision to start in media res might have compromised the film as a story on its own. It could have benefitted from another half hour to really establish Superman’s relationship with his friends and family. But, alas, that’s the cost of jumpstarting both DC’s iconic hero and the entire cinematic universe.
Superman is still an origin story.
Of course, that’s not to say that the film is bad by any means. The two-hour runtime flew by so quickly without a hint of boredom.
As Gunn promised, watching Superman feels like picking up a random comic book in the middle of a run. Sure, there are a bunch of characters you might not know or recognize, but that’s part of the fun. It’s guaranteed to get you hooked on the world and buy the next issue.
While there are a few imperfections with the film as its own story, Gunn’s ability to build a world from the ground up is still top notch. It’s not a rehash of what came before.
For example, Superman can be defeated with just plain brutality. Luthor doesn’t have to rely on the same old kryptonite. The superhero isn’t a cheat code; he’s vulnerable.
The Justice League, as know them, doesn’t exist in this universe (or, at least, not yet). Instead, we have a ragtag band composed of the braggadocious Guy Gardner as Green Lantern (Nathan Fillion), the lackadaisical Hawkgirl (Isabela Merced), and the hyper-intelligent Mister Terrific (Edi Gathegi). These are not the usual characters a budding universe relies on to build a superteam, but Gunn, as always, loves his misfits.
Ultimately, it doesn’t matter. Gunn’s DC Universe is already off to a great start. Besides the intriguing starting lineup, the film also offers glimpses into everything else brewing for the sprawling universe. There are blink-and-you-miss-it references and surprise cameos aplenty. If you’ve been following the torrential news cycles for this film, then you’ll have an idea of what or who might show up. Even if it lacks MCU-level surprises, these should be enough to get you interested in what’s coming next.
It’s not an origin story for Superman himself, but it’s an origin story of what might be the most promising iteration of the DC Universe so far.
Should you watch Superman?
Superman definitely lacks the polish that James Gunn often adds to his more complete successes like The Suicide Squad and Guardians of the Galaxy. It still kept me engaged for all of two hours, though. It’s an amazing superhero film.
And, in the end, Superman does spectacularly what it was set out to do: reboot the DC Universe according to James Gunn. I’m more than excited to see his next chapter.
Superman is out now in cinemas nationwide.
Entertainment
SEGA, Netflix announce Crazy Taxi film adaptation
1st in planned slate of film adaptations, including Sonic and STRANGER THAN HEAVEN
SEGA and Netflix have announced a new Crazy Taxi film adaptation. This will usher in a new collaboration era with the parties also developing adaptations for Sonic and STRANGER THAN HEAVEN.
Such a slate of future adaptations reflects the range of SEGA’s library as it draws on Netflix’s experience bringing beloved game worlds to new audiences.
The first project features Crazy Taxi, which will be written by Dan Gregor and Doug Mand. The beloved writing duo was behind the 2025 reboot of The Naked Gun.
Also on board to help helm the production are the same visionaries behind the Sonic franchise: Neal H. Moritz, Toby Ascher, and Toru Nakahara.
Crazy Taxi has been an arcade hit since 1999, putting players behind the wheel of a fearless cabbie racing the clock through chaotic city streets.
There’s flying off ramps, dodging traffic, and chasing tips with punk-rock energy that has become the series’ signature.
The latest title in the franchise, Crazy Taxi: World Tour, is set for a 2027 release. You can watch its trailer below:
Entertainment
Now Playing: Resident Evil
Horror and comedy join forces in Zach Cregger’s latest masterpiece.
The intersection between horror and comedy is separated by a thin wall of air. In modern times, we’ve seen comedy legends, such as Jordan Peele and John Krasinski, make the successful jump into horror. Some have theorized that laughter is a pain response, which links it to the adrenaline-filled thrill of experiencing horror. Personally, I believe that mastering comedic timing also complements the timing of scary moments in horror. Comedy-trained directors just get it. That’s why the melding of the two genres is always something to look for, and that’s why Zach Cregger’s Resident Evil is a must watch.
Coming from last year’s Weapons, Cregger established himself in the annals of horror history, despite learning the art of filmmaking from cult comedy classics like Miss March and The Whitest Kids U’Know. Weapons (and Barbarian before it) expertly balances the essentials of horror with dark comedy. If you’ve seen either of these movies, then you know what you’re in for with Resident Evil.
Based on the games or the past movies?
Resident Evil is tagged as second reboot of the movie franchise after 2021’s disastrous attempt, starring Kaya Scodelario, which barely registered a hiccup in the oeuvre of Resident Evil films. However, like 2021’s failure, Cregger’s take bases itself primarily on the events of the games, specifically around the plot of Resident Evil 2.
Bryan, a medical courier played by Austin Abrams, is tasked with delivering a top-priority package to Raccoon City. Unbeknownst to him, the way leading into Raccoon City (and the fabled city itself) is already overrun with mutated monstrosities.
And so, Bryan, a courier inexperienced with combat (much less surviving against zombies), must fight his way into the city to deliver his charge.
A worthy protagonist
Over the years, the franchise has seesawed between capable action heroes, like Leon Kennedy, and those who can barely survive, like Biohazard‘s Ethan Winters. On that scale, Bryan falls deeply into Winters’s side of the spectrum. He’s ill-equipped to survive a zombie apocalypse. He even admits that his barebones knowledge of guns comes from videogames. He attempts to shoot locks, thinking they’d work as they do in games. He is not a character you’d want to follow if you’re looking for a gruff man gunning down hordes of zombies with a machine gun.
But that’s exactly what makes this horror film worth watching. Bryan is us. Though there were times I was screaming at the screen because he wouldn’t do the obviously logical thing of running away from blatant traps, our fragile protagonist mimics how we would all react in a horrific situation: a deer in the headlights stuck staring.
Every situation feels more frightful. You don’t know how you’d react. He doesn’t know how he’d react. We’re just stuck trailing along for his ride. If he lingers too long looking at a zombie about to bite him, you have no choice but to look along with him. As a horror protagonist, he’s perfect.
When a camera does the work
Of course, inept protagonists aren’t new to horror. Practically all good horror films will feature a helpless hero standing up to the monster. See: the “final girl” era of horror.
Resident Evil elevates this trope by allowing the camera to do the heavy lifting. The film’s expert transitions into first-person perspectives and over-the-shoulder ones amp up the frights. When Bryan sweeps a room with a gun, the camera takes you down to the muzzle. You become the one sweeping along with him. You see the darkness as he does. The style creates an impressive layer of immersion that brings you into his trauma. Plus, if we’re going with comparisons, the transitions feel like a game taking you from a cutscene back into control of your character.
And it’s not just the perspectives, too. The film mimics several tense moments oft found in horror games, like gingerly creeping through a thin ledge when one false move can mean plummeting to your death. Resident Evil also has scenes in a dark tunnel, the sewers, and an overrun hospital. It’s a veritable who’s who of horror settings. But they all just work. It’s like you’re in a Resident Evil game.
When goofy becomes scary
But that’s enough of how the movie was made. How scary is it?
Taking them from their respective contexts, each monster is goofy. There’s an infirm zombie spewing acid bile that Bryan just bullies around. There’s a seemingly innocent young girl with a tentacle foot. There’s a zombie katamari.
And if that’s not enough, the casting is filled with masters of comedic timing like Paul Walter Hauser, Zach Cherry, and Austin Abrams himself. The first two play bumbling representatives of Umbrella Corporation, people who are too incompetent to do their job. Abrams is the bumbling everyman who can’t make heads or tails of what’s happening. Comedy is a living, breathing presence in this film.
But that’s not to say that this is a comedy film. The horror is still top notch. Cregger just knows how to time everything right.
Unlike modern films today, like in The Conjuring universe, Resident Evil is not a scare-a-minute film. It will not bombard you with jumpscares.
Now, to be fair, there are a fair bit including fakeouts. In fact, under normal circumstances, I’d dislike how many there are. But here, each jumpscare comes with a lengthy period to catch your breath. The film gives you time to relax, to laugh, and, eventually, lower your guard for the next scare. It’s a balanced pace that’s kept up throughout the entire film.
This is exactly how you should pace a horror movie.
Should you watch Resident Evil?
Even with its uniquely comedic style, Resident Evil is one of the most faithful adaptations of a video game I’ve ever seen. Like a game, Cregger’s pacing knows when to let you, the viewer, breathe and when to thrust you back into its monstrosities.
Humor will always go hand in hand with horror. Though the responses to these two categories are technically different, they’re both genres about facing the unexpected. On the box, Resident Evil says that it’s a horror film, but it’s so much more. If you want to laugh, cry, and cower in fear all in the same movie, this is the movie to watch.
Entertainment
Max vs 100 will feature Max Verstappen race against 100 go-karters
The live event will stream at midnight on September 17.
As a child, one of my favorite thought experiments is to imagine who would win in a fight between my favorite characters at the time and a number of other random beings. For example, will Superman prevail against 100 Magnetos? Those are the ways I kept my young mind occupied. Now, as a former child, I still do the same thing but with more realistic people, like imagining if Steph Curry can win against 100 high schoolers. This week, ESPN and Disney+ are making one of those imaginary fights real: Formula 1 legend Max Verstappen versus 100 go-karters.
In an upcoming live event streaming exclusively on Disney+, Max vs 100 will pit the four-time world champion against 100 go-karters from everywhere in pop culture. This gaggle of 100 will include popular content creators such as Twitch streamer ExtraEmily, car photographer Larry Chen, and NBA shooting coach Chris Matthews.
All 101 drivers will race around one of the most iconic tracks in Formula 1 history, Silverstone in England. The track will be reconfigured to match the special race.
Of course, this is more than just a parade of go-karts. Max Verstappen will start at the back of the grid, meaning he has to overtake all 100 racers to win. Now, the Dutch driver is no stranger to winning from the back. In 2024, he won the Sao Paulo Grand Prix despite starting from P17 (out of 20 racers). Max vs 100, though familiar for the driver, presents a different challenge. Can he overtake 100 times to win the race?
Max vs 100 will stream live through Disney+ on September 17, 12:00am PHT.
-
News2 weeks agoiPhone 18 Pro series: Price, availability in the Philippines
-
Singapore2 weeks agoiPhone 18 Pro series: Price, availability in Singapore
-
News2 weeks agoiPhone Duo: Price, availability in the Philippines
-
News2 weeks agoiPhone Duo: Price, availability in Singapore
-
Accessories2 weeks agoCASETiFY upgrades iPhone 18 cases, teases iPhone Duo lineup
-
News2 weeks agoHONOR teases Magic9 Pro Max at Venice
-
Hands-On1 week agoApple iPhone 18 Pro Series Hands-on
-
Gaming2 weeks agoMarvel’s Wolverine review: When the claws come out






