News
Vivo V3 Max gets PH price and release date

When Vivo debuted its new V3 line of smartphones in India last month, the Chinese smartphone maker claimed they were “faster than faster.” Earlier today, when it made the V3 Max official in the Philippines, the phrase that came to mind was: “cheaper than the competition.”
At P16,990, the 5.5-inch V3 Max isn’t necessarily inexpensive, but it’s priced aggressively enough, attractive enough, and feature-rich enough to give the Samsungs of the world a reason to worry. And at a time when just about every OEM is trying to horn in on the premium-for-less space.
Encased in an aluminum unibody with a curved-edge frame and a fingerprint sensor around the back, the V3 Max features an octa-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 processor — which is said to be the spiritual successor to the top-end Snapdragon 810 — alongside 4GB of RAM and 32GB of storage that can be expanded up to an additional 128GB using a microSD card.
The 3,000mAh quick-charge battery, as well as its imaging capabilities are nothing to scoff at, either — the primary and selfie cameras use 13- and 8-megapixel sensors, respectively.
In fact, the only spec that’s arguably disappointing is Android 5.1 Lollipop, but considering Vivo’s heavy-handed approach to software — an attitude it shares with so many Chinese brands — you probably won’t mind too much.
The Vivo V3 Max is already available for preorder in the Philippines with a street date of May 21. For more about the device, and it’s little brother, the Vivo V3, you can read our first impressions here.
[irp posts=”1944″ name=”Vivo V3, V3 Max Hands-On Review”]


It’s apropos that Christopher Nolan’s Oppenheimer is releasing in theaters next month. The world is seemingly looking down the barrel of another global threat to humanity. The target of today’s doomsday, AI, is nothing surprising. However, it’s not every day that the warning comes from the industry’s biggest names themselves.
Recently, in a statement from the Center for AI Safety, the leaders from the world of artificial intelligence have come together to assess the risk of unimpeded technology. The statement, emphasized in a single sentence, reads: “Mitigating the risk of extinction from AI should be a global priority alongside other societal-scale risks such as pandemics and nuclear war.”
While the statement was signed by hundreds of scientists, the biggest names in the industry have signed it as well. These include Sean Altman (CEO of OpenAI), Demis Hassabis (CEO of Google’s DeepMind), and Kevin Scott (CTO of Microsoft), among others.
Besides signing the statement, Altman and his contemporaries have approached lawmakers in a harried attempt to introduce policies to regulate the emerging technology. New policies are slow-going, though.
In contrast, the world’s biggest AI companies are much faster in developing new advancements for the technology. As exemplified by the ongoing Computex trade show, AI is the name of the game.
Critics of the technology have decried how artificial intelligence are uprooting jobs all over the world in all sorts of industries. Others have also wondered when the technology will evolve to match or even overtake human intelligence.
Though the technology is advancing at a rapid clip, it’s hard to tell whether the projected worst-case scenario will come to pass. Equating the technology with pandemics and nuclear war does give one pause.
SEE ALSO: NVIDIA develops an AI for NPCs

Though the platform works differently, Reddit is much like other social media platforms. For one, it relies on users signing up for the service to interact with one another through threads. However, Reddit is also similar by offering its API to third parties. If you’re not happy with using the original website or app, developers can create apps tailored to optimize the experience. Unfortunately, those might soon go away.
Recently, Reddit announced a round of changes coming to its API rules. Starting June 19, the platform will charge third parties for access to their API. In a nutshell, any developer who wants to continue offering a tailored Reddit experience must pay up to access the website.
According to the company, the changes are a result of emerging AI technologies which leverage Reddit for language learning. Naturally, the company isn’t happy with being used for free, resulting in a paid scheme coming soon.
Unfortunately, the pricing scheme isn’t affordable for smaller developers who just want to offer a cleaner experience of the website. Apollo, one of the most popular third-party alternatives to Reddit’s main app, recently announced that Reddit is charging US$ 20 million per year to keep the app running as is. Christian Selig, the app’s developer, confirms that the figure is just too much.
Other apps have not disclosed their discussions with the platform. However, their users have already lamented the impending doom of third-party apps and their involvement with the platform as a whole.
For their part, Reddit says that Selig’s figure only reflects a standard rate, rather than a specialized one as discussed with Apollo. The company remains adamant that it wants to be equitable and civil towards third-party apps.
SEE ALSO: Reddit acquires Dubsmash

It wasn’t the most popular product, but surely other people remember the Chromecast, right? Well, if you’re one of the few who keep fond memories about the device, it’s time to say goodbye. Google has quietly terminated support for the first-generation Chromecast.
Released almost a decade ago, the original Chromecast blossomed in a world that wasn’t ready for smart TVs. The HDMI-based dongle allowed users to broadcast media from their smartphones and tablets onto their television sets. In a nutshell, it was an easy way to turn an older TV into a smart device for an affordable price.
Back in April (or a few months shy of the device’s tenth birthday), Google officially ended support for the first-generation dongle. A short announcement (spotted by 9to5Google) simply states that the device will no longer receive any software updates, and Google will no longer service them. Its last firmware version shipped in November last year. Google also notes that users who continue to use the original dongle might “notice a degradation in performance.”
Unfortunately, that’s just the way the technology goes. The issue it sought to solve — that is, the continued existence of older TVs without smart capabilities — is largely obsolete. Most TVs today have smart features built in, eliminating the necessity for a smart dongle.
However, for those who still have less intelligent sets, Google still sells a newer version of the Chromecast built with Google TV. Instead of controlling the screen with another smartphone, the newer version of the Chromecast packs in the software itself.
-
Camera Shootouts1 week ago
HONOR Magic5 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra: Camera Shootout
-
Gaming2 weeks ago
Grand Theft Auto VI might launch next year
-
Gaming2 weeks ago
LEGO 2K Drive out now
-
Gaming2 weeks ago
PlayStation reveals more details about its controller for disabled gamers
-
Automotive2 weeks ago
Ford showcases its ultimate performance truck yet
-
Features2 weeks ago
13 reasons why you should get the ASUS Zenbook S 13 OLED
-
Hands-On7 days ago
Final Cut Pro for iPad Hands-on: Game Changer!
-
Gaming1 week ago
PlayStation working on more new franchises