News
Zuckerberg: Social media ‘shouldn’t be the arbiter of truth’
Reacting to Twitter fact-checking Trump
A few days ago, Twitter acted out against misinformation in US President Donald Trump’s recent tweets about mail-in ballot voting. The monumental policing is the first time that the social media platform moderated the president’s tweets, especially since Trump favors the platform for his public communication. However, it was not unprecedented. As of late, Twitter has implemented more stringent fact-checking protocols to ensure absolute accuracy.
Naturally, the Trump administration retaliated against what they perceived as censorship. Since the moderation, the president has started pondering on measure to regulate social media in general. Though Twitter is the main target, Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg had his own words to say about the raging debate.
In an interview with Fox News, Zuckerberg went against Twitter’s new moderation policies. “I just believe strongly that Facebook shouldn’t be the arbiter of truth of everything that people say online,” he said. “Private companies shouldn’t be in the position of doing that.”
True enough, Facebook does not have the same fact-checking protocols as Twitter. Zuckerberg believes that every politician should have the same platform as everyone else. At the very least, the platform moderates content in a reactionary fashion using its own terms of service.
Regardless, Trump’s rage against Twitter has lumped all of social media together including Facebook. In this sense, Zuckerberg is also going against Trump’s war. “In general, a government choosing to censor a platform doesn’t strike me as the right reflex,” he said. Further, he defends Facebook as a robust platform against oppressive and harmful content.
Since the rise of cybersecurity in public awareness, Facebook has always found itself in a diminished position owing to massive controversies surrounding its data policies. Given the aggressiveness of the latest Trump-Twitter debate, Zuckerberg is taking a more cautious approach to draw the flak away from Facebook.
In Twitter’s defense, Jack Dorsey has drawn all of the debate’s rage on himself. In a recent tweet, Dorsey calls Trump’s supporters to stop blaming Twitter’s employees; instead, they should get mad at him for implementing the new policy.
SEE ALSO: Facebook is adding a new care reaction to the Like button
Normally, public betas come and go with nary a peep from anyone but dedicated fans and testers. After all, why care about a beta when the final release is likely just around the corner? This one, however, is special. Today, Apple launched the iOS 27 public beta, and it’s our first taste of the redesigned Siri AI.
Recently, WWDC 2026 unveiled Apple’s latest attempts at entering the AI segment. Whereas previous iterations to incorporate AI failed to make an impact, Siri AI promises to provide users with helpful feedback that’s actually helpful.
Now, in the public beta for iOS 27, users all over can finally access the new assistant. To get to the beta, you need to be a part of the beta program, which you can easily sign up for on beta.apple.com. Once signed up, you can get the update from Software Update in Settings. You’ll see options for a developer beta and a public beta. Choose iOS 27 Public Beta.
At face value, Siri AI offers much of what you’d get from a traditional AI-powered assistant. However, it does slightly differ because it integrates the entire phone. The assistant contextualizes your information (including emails, messages, and photos) to give you the most accurate feedback that you might need.
If that’s not enough, Siri AI also has its own chatbot app. If you’re more used to ChatGPT, the assistant should give you that bit of familiarity.
Now, if you don’t want to go for a beta, Apple is expected to launch iOS 27 in its final form sometime in September.
Gaming
Most of the world’s PlayStations will be officially useless by 2028
PlayStation’s disastrous no-disc policy is now a lot worse than you thought.
Last week, we lamented the loss of the PlayStation disc. As we described, the loss isn’t just a major blow to nostalgia for aging gamers, but it also puts a huge question mark on game ownership. Well, there’s another wrinkle that the world is slowly realizing. By deleting physical discs, PlayStation has effectively blockaded their entire service from countries without an official online store.
If you haven’t heard, PlayStation is ceasing the production of physical discs for new games starting 2028. The console will become an all-digital platform. Now, we can blather on and on about how this sucks for ownership, but all gamers will still have access to games online at the very least. Right?
Wrong.
Not every country has an official PlayStation Store or the ability to create a PSN account. In fact, a staggering amount don’t; 121 countries (or 62 percent of the entire world) don’t have official access to the online storefront.
If you live in any of these countries, you’re likely familiar with some unofficial solutions: that is, setting your country elsewhere where the store exists. But, because it’s an unofficial solution, doing this is technically against PlayStation’s policies and can result in bans.
That being said, as noted by users on Reddit, this means that, on a very technical and legal level, these 121 countries will no longer be able to buy physical or digital games starting 2028. Because of a clarified policy, you can still play older games, but if you want to play the latest Call of Duty or NBA 2K, you are out of luck.
There’s no official list of affected countries, other than those collated by others manually. But if you’ve never been able to set your own country on the PlayStation Network, you’re a part of it.
News
FIFA World Cup: Lenovo’s Referee View received positively by fans
Unique first-person perspective brings action closer to viewers
Lenovo has revealed that technological advancements at the FIFA World Cup 2026 has made viewers “feel closer” to the action than ever before.
Surveying fans across Australia, Canada, India, the United Kingdom, and the United States, Lenovo bared that 87% say technology is improving the viewing experience.
Close-to-action camera perspectives have also help 84% of surveyed viewers, making them feel they’re right on the pitch.
Of course, Lenovo AI has introduced Referee View throughout the World Cup. This AI-powered technology gives viewers a first-person POV of the match from a referee’s perspective.
Lenovo Referee View has been featured on an average of three times per match across the tournament in over 220 countries and territories worldwide, according to preliminary FIFA data.
Through a lightweight camera mounted on the match official, the technology gives a first-person POV of the match.
And while raw footage is fast-moving and sometimes unstable, Lenovo’s AI-powered video analytics platform automatically transforms the clips into smooth, broadcast-quality video in real-time.
Other findings from Lenovo’s research include:
- 76% of viewers have seen or heard about Referee View
- 91% say the close-to-action Referee View POV is appealing
- 88% say smooth and stable footage is an important part of viewing sports footage
- 98% say clear picture quality has been important when watching the FIFA World Cup 2026
- 91% are interested in seeing more technology that creates immersive or close-to-action sports experiences
-
News6 days agoNew York becomes first state to ban smart glasses
-
Singapore5 days agoSony launches IER-M500 in-ear monitors
-
Laptops2 weeks agoThe ASUS ExpertBook Ultra wins you over
-
Computers7 days agoGIGABYTE releases new AORUS RTX 5080 INFINITY graphics cards
-
Gaming6 days agoMicrosoft dictates that a new Fallout game is coming
-
Enterprise2 weeks agoGoogle ordered to pay EUR 4.1 billion in fines
-
Accessories2 weeks agoSony brings 1000X THE COLLEXION to the Philippines
-
Gaming7 days agoHoYo FEST 2026 details announced; tickets on sale from July 16
