Enterprise

Huawei executive caught using Apple products

Owned a Huawei Mate 20 RS, though

Published

on

Just like its competitors, Huawei is an intensely competitive smartphone brand. In the past, the company has thrown a lot of shade against its market rivals. The most notable recipient, however, is Apple. Huawei has even punished its employees for using Apple’s products. Not for nothing, the Chinese company has since overtaken Apple in the standings.

Given Huawei’s competitive nature, it would be ironic if the company’s head honchos were using a competitor’s products. Funny enough, that’s what happened.


Late last year, Huawei’s chief finance officer, Meng Wanzhou, was arrested in Canada for illegal business practices. Since then, the Huawei heir languished in house arrest. Her extradition remained in a state of uncertainty.

However, a recent court filing has revealed more information about the arrest. According to the report, Canadian authorities seized a curious number of Apple products. Meng was using an iPhone 7 Plus, a MacBook Air, and an iPad Pro. In her defense, she also carried one Huawei phone — the Huawei Mate 20 RS Porsche Design.

Because of the seizure, Meng’s lawyers requested authorities for a copy of the data. They also asked for the devices to be sealed. Canada has since agreed to the request.

Regardless, Meng’s ownership of a mainly Apple ecosystem is an ironic fact amid the company’s geopolitical troubles. If anything, it’s a refreshing break from the usual strife that Huawei has gotten into over the past year.

Enterprise

We’re not replacing Android yet, Huawei says

HongMeng is not the replacement system

Published

on

Amidst the long-standing Trump saga, Huawei has quietly developed its own operating system. Or so we thought.

Weeks earlier, Google blacklisted Huawei from its services, heralding a premature end to the latter’s Android support. Naturally, Huawei needed a more reliable replacement. Besides third-party replacements, the company supposedly started developing a completely new operating system. According to rumors, the future system will carry the name “Ark” or “HongMeng.”


Of course, as we know now, Huawei’s landmark ban as short-lived. Recently, Trump reversed his decision. Huawei’s Android support lives on — at least, for the immediate future. However, despite the optimism, Huawei isn’t resting on its laurels. HongMeng’s rumor mill kept grinding news every day. Most notably, Huawei was reportedly gearing for a late 2019 launch.

Out of nowhere, Huawei has finally addressed the torrent of rumors. HongMeng isn’t an Android replacement. At least, not yet.

According to senior vice president Catherine Chen, the operating system is not designed for smartphone use. For the meantime, Huawei is working closely with Google for continued support.

In another report, chairman Liang Hua comments on the company’s indecision regarding the operating system. Huawei still hasn’t decided if HongMeng can fit into the Android ecosystem. Further, he clarifies the system’s true nature. Apparently, HongMeng is software meant for industrial IoT devices. Whatever Huawei’s replacement operating system is, it’s not HongMeng.

Regardless, Huawei’s HongMeng system should be a lessened priority for the company. Huawei is still riding on both optimism and a need for damage control. If anything, Huawei is tying up its loose ends before its next big move.

SEE ALSO: Huawei can still get banned again in the future

Continue Reading

Enterprise

These are the best cities for women entrepreneurs to thrive

Singapore ranks third in Asia Pacific, behind Sydney and Melbourne

Published

on

At the 10th annual Dell Women Entrepreneur Network Summit in Singapore, Dell announced findings of the 2019 Women Entrepreneur Cities (WE Cities) Index, ranking 50 global cities on their ability to foster growth for women entrepreneurs. Dell ranks cities based on the impact of local policies, programs, and characteristics in addition to national laws and customs to help improve support for women entrepreneurs and the overall economy.

Building on 10 years of research on women entrepreneurs, Dell partnered with IHS Markit to research and rank 50 cities on five important characteristics, including access to Capital, Technology, Talent, Culture and Markets.


The San Francisco Bay Area outranked New York for the No. 1 spot this year, mostly due to the city being one of the best places for women to gain access to capital. It also moved from 6th place to 2nd place in Culture, showing that the number of role models and public dialogue around eliminating the “bro culture” is making an impact.

Lack of funding, high cost of living, low representation of women in leadership roles and the lack of government-led policies that support women entrepreneurs were among the barriers globally.

Cities in the Asia Pacific (APAC) region are improving alongside all other cities globally, but still have a long way to go. Singapore, one of the only three cities from Southeast Asia to make it to the top 50, saw the highest improvement in the Talent pillar, as it benefitted from increasing its top school and business school rankings, as well as its pool of professionals needed to help scale businesses.

APAC cities mainly fell behind in the pillars for Culture and Markets. Despite making the top 50, Singapore’s Culture score was relatively low due to fewer female role models or leaders, although it’s still more advanced than majority of its neighbors in addressing gender parity issues.

Singapore ranks only No. 47 globally for the Markets pillar, because of the high cost of living in the city despite the lack of accelerators and relatively few female board members.

The WE Cities Index serves as a diagnostic tool to advise policy-makers on how to better support women in business.

“By arming city leaders and policymakers with actionable, data-driven research on the landscape for women entrepreneurs, we can collectively accelerate the success of women-owned businesses by removing financial, cultural and political barriers,” says Karen Quintos, EVP and chief customer officer at Dell Technologies.

The same way US Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued in her landmark cases that gender discrimination hurts men and women alike, Singapore Minister for Culture, Community and Youth Grace Fu also emphasized at the summit that it’s not only women who want a better work life balance; men also want to be able to spend more time with their families.

This is where technology comes in. Technology, as a gender-neutral enabler, helps drive progress in gender equality by creating a level playing field, says Amit Midha, President of Asia Pacific & Japan, Global Digital Cities at Dell Technologies. It’s important to empower and invest in women not just because it’s been proven time and again that women help economies grow, but also because doing so benefits men and society as a whole.

SEE ALSO: Inspiring quotes from Dell Women Entrepreneur Network Summit 2019

Continue Reading

Enterprise

Qualcomm found guilty of unfair pricing

Ordered to pay hundreds of millions of euros

Published

on

For a while now, Qualcomm has waged a legal war against Apple over ambiguous copyright claims. The battle emboldened the chipmaker, leading to quirkier means to keep competitors at bay. To its credit, Qualcomm successfully squeezed out substantial money from its battles. However, karma can come in unexpected forms.

Recently, Qualcomm found itself on the receiving end of a similar legal strife. The European Commission has ruled the company guilty of unfair pricing schemes.


From 2009 to 2011, Qualcomm became a market leader in the 3G modem business. The win practically ensured the company’s dominance in future eras. At the time, Qualcomm’s only major competitor was fellow 3G chipset manufacturer, Nvidia’s Icera.

According to the EU Commission, Qualcomm used antitrust pricing to ensure its win against Icera. Particularly, Qualcomm’s prices were way below cost, drawing more competition towards them. Then-growing companies Huawei and ZTE bought into Qualcomm’s cheaper chips. Icera would eventually fold in 2015.

Of course, cheaper pricing schemes aren’t illegal outright. However, Qualcomm purposely set its prices below the cost to produce them — which is illegal. In effect, they were selling at a loss to block out the competition. Qualcomm’s current dominance draws from its past practices.

Because of the unfair practice, the Commission is fining the company a hefty EUR 242 million. The huge amount totals to 1.27 percent of Qualcomm’s 2018 revenue.

Despite the weight, the fine is only a drop in Qualcomm’s huge bucket. At the very least, the ruling is a warning against unfair business practices. Qualcomm isn’t immune to the same strategies that it employs against its competitors.

SEE ALSO: Qualcomm drops all charges against Apple

Continue Reading

Trending