Entertainment

Now Playing: The Conjuring Last Rites

Quite incoherent and underwhelming for a grand finale

Still: Warner Bros. Pictures

Published

on

The thing about film franchise finales is that they can either become a film series’ climactic finish or just another plain entry.

As with The Conjuring universe’s final entry (of phase one — they’re going to make more movies, apparently), Last Rites, the film leaned towards the latter.

It wasn’t a total letdown. Arguably, there were gripping scenes, particularly throughout the final act.

But still, it lacked the punch expected of a grand finale, given how it has been marketed (remember, it even had the slogan “Prepare for the end” all over its promotional materials).

⚠️ Some spoilers ahead! ⚠️

A potent central conflict was there but…

Still: Warner Bros. Pictures

The supernatural case The Conjuring: Last Rites focused on the real-life alleged haunting of the Smurl family.

For a brief background, the Smurls complained of unnatural disturbances. These included noises, temperature drops, their daughters being pushed by this entity down a flight of stairs, and even more disturbing claims.

Some of these were seen throughout the film, albeit with some tweaks. Janet Smurl was the one thrown off the stairs. Their pet dog was also thrown off a wall while their daughter Dawn vomited blood.

In another scene, Heather was about to blow out her birthday cake candles but “someone” else pre-emptied it. Jack Smurl was also lifted off of his bed in another scene.

In real life, the Smurls claimed these occurrences happened for years and years. Then they finally sought the help of the Warrens in 1986.

The callbacks were nice, but the film could have easily built upon such central conflict, given how intense this demon causing such disturbances sounded. In a vacuum, these were all spine-tingling in the movie.

And as portrayed, the demon easily burned a crucifix and mind-controlled Father Gordon into committing suicide. Pardon the use of MCU terms, but this entity was easily an Avengers-level threat.

However, instead of a chilling story and flowed from start to finish, we kind of got a mediocre finale to a film series that has spanned 12 years.

Execution was lackluster

What was clear throughout the film is that the lack of execution was evident. Even if this was based on a true story, the filmmakers still had the room to alter parts here and there. Infusing more elements or go with a certain direction could have made the entire story more cinematic.

As with previous films, Last Rites used a conduit object to present the demon, in the form of an antique mirror with carved figures. This was shown right from the get-go, when a pregnant Lorraine Warren in the 1960s had to investigate it.

Still: Warner Bros. Pictures

This mirror would find its way back into the Warrens’ lives several years later when it was revealed to have been in the Smurls’ home.

Lorraine would reveal later during the film’s final phase that the demon using the mirror was also controlling three more spirits.

I would have personally loved for a backstory for these three characters, even if it was just brief. The scary farmer, in particular, was reduced to just a cameo, chasing Lorraine at the basement of the Smurls’ residence.

As it was mentioned that there was an affair, perhaps having these spirits call for help by manifesting themselves throughout the film would have added another layer to the central conflict.

Still: Warner Bros. Pictures

Questionable pacing, unnecessary runtime

Given the poor execution, we got a pacing that was clearly off throughout a film that was two hours and 15 minutes long.

We got a bunch of random jump scares instead, from the toy doll at the Smurls’ home to another during the scene when Tony Spera, Judy Warren’s would be husband, was driving.

I would have loved to have seen more desperation from the Smurls from the get-go — that they had sought for help with more sense of urgency.

As scary as they were, the disturbances felt randomly presented. They didn’t pack a punch. Again, that’s given how intense this demon actually was.

Too much human aspect?

Still: Warner Bros. Pictures

Interspersed throughout were the more human aspects of the Warrens. It was established that the Warrens didn’t want to take any more cases as they were focused on retirement.

There was Ed Warren’s birthday celebration, along with the introduction of ex-policeman Tony Spera as Judy’s future fiancé.

These scenes showed Ed and Lorraine simply as supportive parents, instead of demonologists. There were also the couple’s tour, giving out lectures to schools.

However, these did contribute to a longer runtime. Such parts were also conversation-heavy, and arguably, could have been reduced or condensed to give way for the central conflict.

To be fair, we did get a vibe that the demon was not going to stop at any cost in letting the Warrens live their peaceful post-paranormal investigation lives, given the eventual marriage of their daughter Judy.

It just should have been presented more convincingly that this was what the demon was really after, and not just wreaking havoc inside the Smurls’ West Pittston, Pennsylvania home.

Or perhaps, Vera Farmiga’s Lorraine, given her clairvoyance, could have warned the newly-engaged couple of the danger that is about to come. That’s since the demon wouldn’t let them enjoy a happy ending.

Defying the ‘last rites’

In reality, it’s quite clear that the Warrens kept their daughter Judy away from their professional endeavors. Perhaps, it’s this premise that the filmmakers tried to be faithful to.

That’s because throughout the movie, you could only see a Judy that was constantly scared of the unknown. She kept chanting the locket-in-the-pocket lullaby to avoid seeing things.

Even the fictional Lorraine would tell her daughter she would never be ready for what her parents have been doing for decades.

Make no mistake, there were parts of the movie wherein Judy was insistent and showed the will to help her parents.

If there was just room for more creativity, it would have made sense for a scene involving Judy head-on against the demon.

The fact that Judy was supposed to be stillborn yet managed to survived implied she had some sort of powers, or that she was chosen. Besides, it was the movie’s title to begin with.

More buildup perhaps

Still: Warner Bros. Pictures

Or, it should have been shown in greater volume that the demon was constantly going after Judy. That’s to get even with the Warrens but for Judy, it was to defy the “last rites”.

This would have presented some sort of dilemma as well and giving the Warrens the predicament to balance investigating what’s going on with the Smurls with trying to protect their only child.

Also mentioned was Ed’s heart attack risk. The demon did target this vulnerability too through a possessed Judy briefly.

To the final act’s credit, it was obvious that Judy still was the weakest link, and the demon pounced on this. That checks out with the paranormal logic established in the film series universe and even in reality.

Eventually, all three Warrens beat the demonic mirror together, with Lorraine telling Judy to stop running away from the situation.

It’s not that there wasn’t a buildup as we saw problems from the Warrens’ dinner to Judy trying out a wedding dress at the boutique.

But Lorraine kept being vague about “something wrong/isn’t right” when we knew the mirror found a way back into their lives. I find it hard to believe she didn’t know beforehand that it has always been about the demon going after Judy.

More of a tribute

Still: Warner Bros. Pictures

It’s pretty obvious that the end was a symbolic passing of the torch to Judy. And in real life, she did put up her own paranormal agency together with Tony.

So was Ed tossing the keys to Tony during one of the final scenes in the artifact room.

You can understand that the film was also a tribute in a way. Hence, there was the iconic Annabelle doll, though it arguably was a useless cameo.

Naturally, the wedding scene also paved the way for some of previous characters to appear in celebration of the entire film series.

Quite incoherent for a finale

But ultimately, as a standalone film, The Conjuring: Last Rites was incoherent. As I’ve kept mentioning throughout this article, it lacked what we expected for a grand finale.

That’s given everything already established in The Conjuring universe with respect to paranormal logic.

Should you watch it? Just to pull up our glorious managing editor’s Watch Scale again:

  • Watch ASAP
  • Watch at your convenience
  • Wait for crowd/ hype to trickle down
  • Wait on streaming
  • Skip

The Conjuring: Last Rites is between the second and third bullet points. It wasn’t totally boring but also underwhelmed for what is supposedly a slam-banging finale.

Make no mistake, the scare factor was constantly there. You know, if you’re specifically looking for an ample dose of fright with companions inside a theater.

Entertainment

SEGA, Netflix announce Crazy Taxi film adaptation

1st in planned slate of film adaptations, including Sonic and STRANGER THAN HEAVEN

Published

on

SEGA and Netflix have announced a new Crazy Taxi film adaptation. This will usher in a new collaboration era with the parties also developing adaptations for Sonic and STRANGER THAN HEAVEN.

Such a slate of future adaptations reflects the range of SEGA’s library as it draws on Netflix’s experience bringing beloved game worlds to new audiences.

The first project features Crazy Taxi, which will be written by Dan Gregor and Doug Mand. The beloved writing duo was behind the 2025 reboot of The Naked Gun.

Also on board to help helm the production are the same visionaries behind the Sonic franchise: Neal H. Moritz, Toby Ascher, and Toru Nakahara.

Crazy Taxi has been an arcade hit since 1999, putting players behind the wheel of a fearless cabbie racing the clock through chaotic city streets.

There’s flying off ramps, dodging traffic, and chasing tips with punk-rock energy that has become the series’ signature.

The latest title in the franchise, Crazy Taxi: World Tour, is set for a 2027 release. You can watch its trailer below:

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Now Playing: Resident Evil

Horror and comedy join forces in Zach Cregger’s latest masterpiece.

Published

on

The intersection between horror and comedy is separated by a thin wall of air. In modern times, we’ve seen comedy legends, such as Jordan Peele and John Krasinski, make the successful jump into horror. Some have theorized that laughter is a pain response, which links it to the adrenaline-filled thrill of experiencing horror. Personally, I believe that mastering comedic timing also complements the timing of scary moments in horror. Comedy-trained directors just get it. That’s why the melding of the two genres is always something to look for, and that’s why Zach Cregger’s Resident Evil is a must watch.

Coming from last year’s Weapons, Cregger established himself in the annals of horror history, despite learning the art of filmmaking from cult comedy classics like Miss March and The Whitest Kids U’Know. Weapons (and Barbarian before it) expertly balances the essentials of horror with dark comedy. If you’ve seen either of these movies, then you know what you’re in for with Resident Evil.

Based on the games or the past movies?

Resident Evil is tagged as second reboot of the movie franchise after 2021’s disastrous attempt, starring Kaya Scodelario, which barely registered a hiccup in the oeuvre of Resident Evil films. However, like 2021’s failure, Cregger’s take bases itself primarily on the events of the games, specifically around the plot of Resident Evil 2.

Bryan, a medical courier played by Austin Abrams, is tasked with delivering a top-priority package to Raccoon City. Unbeknownst to him, the way leading into Raccoon City (and the fabled city itself) is already overrun with mutated monstrosities.

And so, Bryan, a courier inexperienced with combat (much less surviving against zombies), must fight his way into the city to deliver his charge.

A worthy protagonist

Over the years, the franchise has seesawed between capable action heroes, like Leon Kennedy, and those who can barely survive, like Biohazard‘s Ethan Winters. On that scale, Bryan falls deeply into Winters’s side of the spectrum. He’s ill-equipped to survive a zombie apocalypse. He even admits that his barebones knowledge of guns comes from videogames. He attempts to shoot locks, thinking they’d work as they do in games. He is not a character you’d want to follow if you’re looking for a gruff man gunning down hordes of zombies with a machine gun.

But that’s exactly what makes this horror film worth watching. Bryan is us. Though there were times I was screaming at the screen because he wouldn’t do the obviously logical thing of running away from blatant traps, our fragile protagonist mimics how we would all react in a horrific situation: a deer in the headlights stuck staring.

Every situation feels more frightful. You don’t know how you’d react. He doesn’t know how he’d react. We’re just stuck trailing along for his ride. If he lingers too long looking at a zombie about to bite him, you have no choice but to look along with him. As a horror protagonist, he’s perfect.

When a camera does the work

Of course, inept protagonists aren’t new to horror. Practically all good horror films will feature a helpless hero standing up to the monster. See: the “final girl” era of horror.

Resident Evil elevates this trope by allowing the camera to do the heavy lifting. The film’s expert transitions into first-person perspectives and over-the-shoulder ones amp up the frights. When Bryan sweeps a room with a gun, the camera takes you down to the muzzle. You become the one sweeping along with him. You see the darkness as he does. The style creates an impressive layer of immersion that brings you into his trauma. Plus, if we’re going with comparisons, the transitions feel like a game taking you from a cutscene back into control of your character.

And it’s not just the perspectives, too. The film mimics several tense moments oft found in horror games, like gingerly creeping through a thin ledge when one false move can mean plummeting to your death. Resident Evil also has scenes in a dark tunnel, the sewers, and an overrun hospital. It’s a veritable who’s who of horror settings. But they all just work. It’s like you’re in a Resident Evil game.

When goofy becomes scary

But that’s enough of how the movie was made. How scary is it?

Taking them from their respective contexts, each monster is goofy. There’s an infirm zombie spewing acid bile that Bryan just bullies around. There’s a seemingly innocent young girl with a tentacle foot. There’s a zombie katamari.

And if that’s not enough, the casting is filled with masters of comedic timing like Paul Walter Hauser, Zach Cherry, and Austin Abrams himself. The first two play bumbling representatives of Umbrella Corporation, people who are too incompetent to do their job. Abrams is the bumbling everyman who can’t make heads or tails of what’s happening. Comedy is a living, breathing presence in this film.

But that’s not to say that this is a comedy film. The horror is still top notch. Cregger just knows how to time everything right.

Unlike modern films today, like in The Conjuring universe, Resident Evil is not a scare-a-minute film. It will not bombard you with jumpscares.

Now, to be fair, there are a fair bit including fakeouts. In fact, under normal circumstances, I’d dislike how many there are. But here, each jumpscare comes with a lengthy period to catch your breath. The film gives you time to relax, to laugh, and, eventually, lower your guard for the next scare. It’s a balanced pace that’s kept up throughout the entire film.

This is exactly how you should pace a horror movie.

Should you watch Resident Evil?

Even with its uniquely comedic style, Resident Evil is one of the most faithful adaptations of a video game I’ve ever seen. Like a game, Cregger’s pacing knows when to let you, the viewer, breathe and when to thrust you back into its monstrosities.

Humor will always go hand in hand with horror. Though the responses to these two categories are technically different, they’re both genres about facing the unexpected. On the box, Resident Evil says that it’s a horror film, but it’s so much more. If you want to laugh, cry, and cower in fear all in the same movie, this is the movie to watch.

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Max vs 100 will feature Max Verstappen race against 100 go-karters

The live event will stream at midnight on September 17.

Published

on

As a child, one of my favorite thought experiments is to imagine who would win in a fight between my favorite characters at the time and a number of other random beings. For example, will Superman prevail against 100 Magnetos? Those are the ways I kept my young mind occupied. Now, as a former child, I still do the same thing but with more realistic people, like imagining if Steph Curry can win against 100 high schoolers. This week, ESPN and Disney+ are making one of those imaginary fights real: Formula 1 legend Max Verstappen versus 100 go-karters.

In an upcoming live event streaming exclusively on Disney+, Max vs 100 will pit the four-time world champion against 100 go-karters from everywhere in pop culture. This gaggle of 100 will include popular content creators such as Twitch streamer ExtraEmily, car photographer Larry Chen, and NBA shooting coach Chris Matthews.

All 101 drivers will race around one of the most iconic tracks in Formula 1 history, Silverstone in England. The track will be reconfigured to match the special race.

Of course, this is more than just a parade of go-karts. Max Verstappen will start at the back of the grid, meaning he has to overtake all 100 racers to win. Now, the Dutch driver is no stranger to winning from the back. In 2024, he won the Sao Paulo Grand Prix despite starting from P17 (out of 20 racers). Max vs 100, though familiar for the driver, presents a different challenge. Can he overtake 100 times to win the race?

Max vs 100 will stream live through Disney+ on September 17, 12:00am PHT.

SEE ALSO: Disney+ is moving to a global app experience

Continue Reading

Trending