The first Xiaomi smartphones I’ve reviewed are the Mi 9T and Mi 9T Pro way back in 2019. One year passed by, I’ve had enough time to test the Mi 10T Pro.
Another year later, I got to test another Xiaomi T successor in the line. The Xiaomi 11T Pro (yes, without the ‘Mi’ branding anymore) is a capable smartphone that can surely hold the “flagship killer” title. But what does it look like against its older sibling?
Well, here are 11 changes I’ve listed down for you to know.
1. Design
From afar, the Xiaomi 11T Pro looks more premium and elegant compared to the Mi 10T Pro. Not only does it have that brushed metal back design, it also looks more well-crafted and thought out.

While both have glass backs, the Mi 10T Pro doesn’t radiate elegance — especially in this less fancy Cosmic Black colorway that I have versus the 11T Pro’s Meteorite Gray colorway.
The camera cutout looks cleaner and less pronounced. The new Xiaomi logo also looks more modern compared to that old “Mi” branding.
2. Build Quality

While the Mi 10T Pro has a Gorilla Glass 5 protection, the Xiaomi 11T Pro’s front display features a tougher Gorilla Glass Victus. It wasn’t mentioned though if Xiaomi also placed one on its back.
Both Mi phones also have an aluminum frame but the Xiaomi 11T Pro has a matte-textured frame compared to Mi 10T Pro’s glossy a la stainless steel.
3. Display
Xiaomi has finally come to their senses by bringing an AMOLED display to the Xiaomi 11T Pro. Having an AMOLED display not only brings you better dynamic range and contrast especially with Dolby Vision, it also means you get an Always-On Display for notifications. That’s something the Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro doesn’t have.

While they’ve reduced the refresh rate from the Mi 10T Pro’s 144Hz down to 120Hz, it still is a better display as the IPS-LCD is lackluster especially in displaying deeper blacks and whiter whites. Besides, 120Hz still looks as smooth as the higher 144Hz.
Brightness levels on the Xiaomi 11T Pro’s display are also higher at around 800 to 1000 nits versus the measly 500 to 650 nits on the Mi 10T Pro. This means better sunlight legibility that I truly attest.
4. Biometrics

Despite having an AMOLED display, the Xiaomi 11T Pro still has a side-mounted fingerprint sensor on its power button. But instead of the Mi 10T Pro’s recessed scanner (which kind of feels a little bit cheap and flimsy), the 11T Pro has a raised power button with greater tactile response.
Based on experience, the 11T Pro’s fingerprint scanner feels faster and more responsive even with wet hands. The Mi 10T Pro’s sensor had lapses when unlocking the phone even when my fingers are dry.
5. Speakers

Both phones have stereo speakers but one distinct feature that the Xiaomi 11T Pro has is the Harman/Kardon-powered speakers. Not only it’s better sounding with fuller and richer stereo sound, you also get better experience especially because its paired with Dolby Atmos. These features are something that the old Mi 10T Pro doesn’t have.
6. Rear cameras

While both phones have a “108MP camera” plastered on each of their camera bumps, the Xiaomi 11T Pro looked like it has a downgraded 108MP camera with an f/1.8 aperture (versus f/1.7 on the Mi 10T Pro) as well as the lack of OIS.
The ultra-wide camera changed too. From a 13MP f/2.4 with 123-degree FoV to an 8MP f/2.2 120-degree lens. Both lack a telephoto zoom lens but still keeps the 5MP f/2.4 macro lens.
7. Punch-hole cameras
If you’ll compare these two Mi phones side-by-side, you’d easily identify which is which based on the placement of each punch-hole cutouts.

The Mi 10T Pro has it on the left side, while the Xiaomi 11T Pro’s front camera was moved at the center. This is a bold move considering past Xiaomi smartphones including the Mi 11 and the Mi 11 Ultra used the former layout. It would cause a confusion when let’s say you put it beside a Samsung Galaxy A72 for that matter.
Also, the selfie cameras are different. The Mi 10T Pro has a 20MP f/2.2 camera while the Xiaomi 11T Pro has a 16MP f/2.5 sensor. That sounded like another downgrade from last year but you have to see my camera shootout to find out.
8. Performance
Both the Xiaomi 11T Pro and Mi 10T Pro are equipped with the latest Snapdragon chipsets during their time of announcement. The Mi 10T Pro has a Snapdragon 865 chipset — which is a flagship processor last 2020. Meanwhile, the Xiaomi 11T Pro is equipped the latest Snapdragon 888 processor.

On paper, they’re both capable 5G octa-core chipsets. The differentiating factor other than the clock speeds are the Adreno 660 vs 650 from last year. The Xiaomi 11T Pro also offers a 12GB RAM aside from the 8GB variant. The Mi 10T Pro was only offered with 8GB of memory.
9. Battery life

While both possess a 5000mAh battery, battery life seems to be different due to the difference in chipset. The Xiaomi 11T Pro runs a more efficient processor so it makes sense that it lasts longer.
The Mi 10T Pro can still last longer than most smartphones out there but its 7nm+ chipset prevents in from performing better than the newer premiere model in the Xiaomi T line.
10. Charging

One big leap that Xiaomi did in a span of a year is the 120W turbo charging in the Xiaomi 11T Pro. The Mi 10T Pro only had a 33W turbo charger which is fast but not as close as what the 11T Pro has to offer today.
On paper, Xiaomi promises 17 minutes of charge from zero to 100 percent. You have to check my Mi 11T Pro review to find that claim.
11. Pricing

It would be amiss not to point out how their launch prices also changed.
The Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro was launched for PhP 24,990. Meanwhile, the base variant of Xiaomi 11T Pro starts at PhP 27,990. If you’ll do the math, that’s a PhP 3000 increase. But if we’ll consider the Mi 9T Pro in this segment, that phone retailed for only PhP 18,990. That’s almost a PhP 10,000 increase in just two years!
If Xiaomi keeps doing this on their T series lineup, their loyal fanbase might look elsewhere — including their Redmi and POCO sub-brands.
The first leg of Spartan Race’s Philippine National Series doesn’t wait for anyone.
We joined an OCR team, BGY BYG aka Bring Your Game, at Bridgetowne Obstacle Park as they put themselves through an obstacle course race simulation. I brought the Canon EOS R6 Mark III to document every athlete giving their best.
Shooting under direct midday sun is its own challenge. The 32.5MP sensor handled the harshness of open daylight without blowing out detail. The 40fps electronic shutter and Pre-continuous shooting meant we were already in the frame before the moment fully happened.
Athletes were moving fast and in every direction, but the 8.5-stop IBIS kept every shot steady as we moved alongside them.
The Dual Pixel CMOS AF II stayed locked mid-sprint, mid-climb, and everywhere in between.
This is what race prep looks like up close.

Abegail Manzano, UAAP Season 85 Rookie of the Year in women’s athletics at UP Diliman, leading the warm-up session.
SEE ALSO: What HYROX Hong Kong looks like up close
Words and photos by MJ Jucutan.
Computex 2026
Why is AI loved in COMPUTEX but hated in the rest of the world?
Two sides of the same coin.
To cover COMPUTEX 2026, I found myself staying in the Grand Hilai Taipei, a 5-star hotel right beside the Taipei Nangang Exhibition Center (TaiNEX), the historical home of the annual conference. I can’t help but think of The Grand Budapest Hotel, a Wes Anderson flick about a similarly decadent hotel. But it’s not the plush hotel rooms, the hospitable staff, or the Romanesque public sauna that has me thinking of the iconic 2014 film. Rather, it’s the man of the hour himself, NVIDIA’s Jensen Huang, the king of today’s AI.
In The Grand Budapest Hotel, Ralph Fiennes plays Monsieur Gustave, the eponymous hotel’s flamboyant concierge. Always the life of the party, Gustave blends seamlessly into the hotel’s luxurious pink decor as he cavorts willy-nilly with the elder clientele. While the film flings Gustave around a thrilling chase for a deceased friend’s inheritance, the film’s subtext is one of politics, mistrust, and war. Around the hotel, the world haplessly descends into the geopolitical turmoil that brought about the Second World War. And yet, Gustave remains indifferent, content as he is to be atop his lofty pulpit while luxuriating in L’Air de Panache.
Jensen Huang, clad in his trademark leather jacket, is our story’s Monsieur Gustave. Much like Gustave, Huang revels in the fanfare around him. In COMPUTEX, he’s a hero adored by the masses. Wherever he goes, fans bend over backwards to take a selfie. His merchandise (and yes, it exists), touting AI-generated versions of him, is constantly sold out. It’s a stark contrast to the world and all its doom-and-gloom for a future bloated with AI.
The silence behind the applause
Before the official start of COMPUTEX, Huang conducted his own keynote speech for NVIDIA. If you’ve been to one of his keynotes in the past, you’ll hardly recognize what it’s become. There’s no more talks of realistic graphics or faster gaming performance. It’s all about AI.
Most of his time was dedicated to Vera Rubin, a multi-rack AI supercomputer destined to power the future’s data centers. Amid the drone of technical jargon (almost bordering on technobabble), I was quietly asking myself what I was doing here. Meanwhile, beside me, an enthusiastic woman clapped with as much fervor as if Huang was the second coming of Christ himself. Even if Huang could hear her individual applause (and he most certainly didn’t), he couldn’t have seen her Googling frantically what a multi-rack AI supercomputer was.
After what felt like forever on the Vera Rubin, Huang finally talked about a consumer-ready product: the new RTX Spark laptops. Admittedly, my interest was piqued. After all, it’s supposed to be the next evolution of PCs. Cue: more applause.
Although, the subtext here is as loud as the clamor. Though it’s certainly impressive that a single RTX Spark notebook can deliver 1 petaflop of AI performance and 192GB of unified memory, this next big thing is not for you and me. No one wanted to talk about the price of these things; not a single OEM, not even Huang himself.
All the hype is on productivity and profitability. It will make more work and more money… but not for you. If anything, you’ll probably end up worse.
The price of progress
Building a PC these days can bankrupt you just as easily as visiting an American hospital. A decent stick of RAM is no longer as accessible as it was a few years ago. And it’s all thanks to AI.
Touting them as humanity’s next evolution, the world’s biggest tech companies want you, a regular consumer, to believe that the technology is coming to your home. But first, they need acres of real estate for data centers. Several states in America have already relegated land to put up these centers, much to the chagrin of their residents. Despite assurances that newer ones can more effectively balance the load on the grid, these same data centers need a lot of space, power, and water. All three of which are coming from the communities surrounding them. At the time of this writing, some state governments are pushing back against the incoming infrastructure, perhaps realizing the mistake of unimpeded data center developments. The outside world is slowly turning on AI, but it’s not a global crackdown.
And that’s before the effect of these data centers on regular consumer technology. Besides all that land, they need a horde of silicon. That’s why NVIDIA has stopped positioning itself as a GPU company, and that’s why all the chips just disappeared. All those data centers are buying up the world’s stock of chips. It’s all a matter of supply and demand at that point; scarcity drives prices up, and we’re left to pick up the pieces. The GPU that was supposed to go to your new PC is now inside a data center somewhere in the States.
Even if you don’t live near a data center, you’re still not safe. Companies, especially in the Western world, believe that AI can replace human workers, leading to mass layoffs. To be clear, while AI can help with productivity when used as a tool, a full replacement isn’t the most feasible option yet. In fact, according to Fortune, AI is just a convenient scapegoat when companies simply want to cut labor expenses by any means necessary.
And yet, the party goes on. Huang is adamant that you are on the ground floor of a revolution that will change the world. But, sorry, bucko; that elevator is going up without you.
The mask falls
As tempting as it is to pick on a single target, the NVIDIA CEO wasn’t the only Monsieur Gustave gallivanting around COMPUTEX. Qualcomm’s Cristiano Amon had his own keynote speech to herald the annual conference. But, opposed to decadence of Huang’s optimism, Amon lets his mask fall just a tiny bit.
To his credit, Amon didn’t extol Qualcomm’s developments exclusively. Rather, he spoke of the overall effects of AI on our world. It’s, of course, the usual optimistic accoutrements of harder, better, faster, stronger for society. Eventually, his excitement gets the best of him and lets slip some shadier effects.
“6G will turn us all into walking cameras,” he said, talking about how AI will affect connectivity.
Now, to be fair, radio frequency sensing isn’t new technology. It’s already been possible to detect objects using only radio signals. 6G, bolstered by AI, will expand this to cover a much wider area for more possible uses.
Amon himself admits that it was a controversial statement. But perhaps, he doesn’t know (or care) about any potential invasions of privacy. He remains ever-so-confident that the use of 6G for surveillance will ultimately help with public safety and infrastructure.
All I can think of is The Dark Knight‘s Lucius Fox doing the moral thing and shutting off Batman’s mass surveillance system after finding the Joker.
It’s a tiny slip, but it speak volumes. Your privacy is a sacrifice that they’re willing to take.
As if that’s not enough, Amon signs off on his diatribe with a succinct “resistance is futile,” talking to those who still oppose AI.
An odd way to start off a celebration of AI, isn’t it? Traditionally, that phrase is one oft used by villainous characters, but that’s just par for the course in today’s AI-infested world. Peter Thiel, one of the moguls of AI, infamously named his company Palantir, the same malevolent surveillance tool used by Sauron in The Lord of the Rings. For some, masks don’t really exist.
The other concierge
Speaking as someone who keeps his finger on the pulse of AI more on the Western side of the world, it’s strange to see a different side of the coin. Huang and Amon are icons. You can’t last two seconds without seeing a single mention of AI somewhere on the show floor. There’s a palpable electricity when talking about the potential of AI.
And to be fair, when I talked to a few developers and engineers, I can feel the optimism. One talked about a voice assistant that would suggest better gift ideas for her spouse based on their history. Another one passionately talked about how much gaming has been better with DLSS 4.5. They truly believe that AI can work to their (and our) benefit, and I believe them. Underneath the smarminess of tech billionaires are ordinary people who found ways to better society. That’s where the conversation about AI should start.
But that’s not what the people want. The people want the parties, the glitz and the glamor. And all these billionaires desperately want to be the next Steve Jobs, the next Great Gatsby. And everyone else wants someone to hate.
In Taiwan, it’s not easy to hate a Monsieur Gustave that wants to make you feel welcome. It’s much easier to come for a monster taking your land, your jobs, and your money.
In Taiwan, Monsieur Gustave can have his parties, his adoring friends, and his fancy leather jacket. But in the rest of the world, he finds in himself the caretaker of an entirely different hotel, The Shining’s Overlook Hotel. Beneath Monsieur Gustave is Jack Torrance, and he’s always been the caretaker.
“Here’s Jensen!”
Within two months, TECNO separately launched the SPARK 50 Pro and SPARK 50 5G.
Clearly, the uprising brand aims to target consumers who want to buy a shiny new smartphone within their means. This also meant budget buyers might get confused which to get between the two.
Interested yet still confused? Read more to know which SPARK is your GadgetMatch.
Design
While design is (and will always be) subjective, the design of the TECNO SPARK 50 Pro and SPARK 50 5G are on two different sides of the coin.
The newer SPARK 50 Pro is offered in stronger color choices — from Midnight Blue to the Dynamic Orange I own. Albeit, there are the less flashy Ink Black, Titanium Grey, and Cloud White shades.
On the other hand, the SPARK 50 5G has classier colorways: Champagne Gold, Mint Green and Fantasy Purple. That’s alongside the subdued Ink Black and Titanium Grey options.
Personally, the SPARK 50 5G’s clean-looking horizontal camera bar design was the clear giveaway. While the SPARK 50 Pro is a bit slimmer at 7.8mm, the SPARK 50 5G is still comfortable to hold despite being thicker at 8.18mm.
Furthermore, the Champagne Gold unit I rock looks more premium and doesn’t try to be in with the unnecessary “orange” trend.
Editor’s Choice: SPARK 50 5G
Durability
Usually, design and durability coincide with one another. But, that’s not always the case.
Despite the SPARK 50 5G having an aviation-grade body, it only has an IP64 rating. It can withstand dust particles but, only water splashes and light sprays. Good to note though that it is MIL-STD-810H compliant.
Meanwhile, the less premium-looking SPARK 50 Pro actually boasts the sturdier IP68 and IP69 water and resistance ratings. This means it can withstand dust, water immersion, and even stronger, high-pressure sprays.
This makes the SPARK 50 Pro one of the few phones to have an IP rating previously limited to flagships and higher-end midrangers.
Editor’s Choice: SPARK 50 Pro
Audiovisual
Both the SPARK 50 Pro and SPARK 50 5G share a 6.78-inch IPS LCD display. Both are also 720p in resolution and refresh rate maxes out at 120Hz.
Obviously, these phones don’t have the best in class displays. But, for such segment and price, having such display tech alongside a punch-hole cutout (instead of a raindrop notch) means a lot.
Stereo speakers are also powered by DTS sound. Undoubtedly, these two phones are like identical twins in this segment.
The only thing that the SPARK 50 5G has the upper-hand is none other than its inclusion of 3.5mm audio jack that the SPARK 50 Pro lacks. Still beneficial for people who fully rely on wired audio.
Editor’s Choice: SPARK 50 5G
Performance
While the front part is harder to distinguish from one another, each inner core is what separates these phones apart.
The TECNO SPARK 50 5G is powered by the MediaTek’s Dimensity 6400 SoC.
Of course, it’s not the most powerful out there. But, for its league, it’s a capable chipset that can multitask and run most game titles. Even 5G support never forgotten.
Meanwhile, the SPARK 50 Pro, despite having that “Pro” superlative, only runs the Dimensity G100 Ultimate. CPU speeds are obviously lower. Worse? It’s only limited to 4G speeds.
On the positive note, it gives better camera support.
Memory sizes are available in 4,6, and 8GB with storage options in either 128 or 256GB. Fortunately, these phones still have a dedicated microSD slot.
Editor’s Choice: SPARK 50 5G
Camera
With the camera talk already mentioned, most would think that the 50MP main rear camera of the SPARK 50 Pro and SPARK 50 5G are just the same. Well, they’re not.
Photography duties of the SPARK 50 Pro are mainly handled by Sony’s LYTIA 600 (or LYT-600) image sensor. For reference, that’s the same image sensor found on most modern midrangers.
The SPARK 50 5G uses an older Sony Exmor sensor. Aperture slightly differ at f/1.9 and f/1.8 respectively.
For further context, here’s how the two smartphones produce photos.
To compensate for that, the SPARK 50 5G tends to over-sharpen and color boost its photo output over SPARK 50 Pro’s natural image rendering.
The SPARK 50 Pro also has a better-looking bokeh falloff than its 5G counterpart.
Editor’s Choice: SPARK 50 Pro
Power
Finally, the highlight of both phones: battery capacity.
ICYMI, the TECNO SPARK 50 Pro has two versions: a single-cell 5600mAh model and a bigger 6000mAh dual-cell version.
The SPARK 50 5G takes it up a notch with an even bigger 6500mAh capacity.
Although that is only a 500mAh (or 900mAh) discrepancy, that battery boost still means a lot for an every day user.
Charging-wise, the SPARK 50 Pro has a faster 60W speed over the regular 45W charging in the 5G version.
IMHO, I would still choose a bigger battery over faster charging speeds. Still, it’s great to have both in a single package.
Editor’s Choice: SPARK 50 5G
Which afforda-phone SPARKs more joy?
If we are going to tally the scores, the clear afforda-phone winner is none other than the TECNO SPARK 50 5G.
It ticks 4 out of 6 boxes — from that classier design to its beastly battery despite that thin chassis. Even better, a 5G-capable chipset and 3.5mm audio jack inclusion that the “Pro” variant simply lacks.
However, that doesn’t mean the SPARK 50 Pro is lackluster.
If you value the cameras and durability more than anything else, the TECNO SPARK 50 Pro is clearly the one you should get.
At the end of the day, it all boils down to how much of your hard-earned savings you are willing to let go.
-
India1 week agoTECNO’s POVA 8 5G is both futuristic and future-ready
-
Buyer's Guide2 weeks agoBuyer’s Guide: Xiaomi Pad 8 Series
-
Reviews2 weeks agoHONOR Magic V6 review: The best version of a book-style foldable?
-
Gaming1 week agoKingdom Hearts IV gets new trailer, confirms Switch 2 release
-
Gaming1 week agoFinal Fantasy fans have two big reasons to look forward to 2026
-
Smartphones2 weeks agoUpcoming realme C100 series to feature 8,000mAh battery
-
Gaming2 weeks agoNintendo officially announces Ocarina of Time remake
-
News6 days agoTECNO’s SPARK 50 Pro is the latest budget smartphone battery beast


























































